Preview

No Limits To The Bill Of Rights

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
615 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
No Limits To The Bill Of Rights
Ever since 1791, the freedom of speech has been a civil liberty to all Americans. Our founding fathers wrote the Bill of Rights to protect citizens from the government, and restricting what we can or can’t say is unconstitutional. Freedom of speech has greatly impacted America and putting restraints on our freedoms may cause many issues within society that can result in a lot more damage than words. Individually we have the right to say whatever we want and it’s more up to the other individual on how they interpret it and how it affects them personally. Despite hate speech being hateful and demeaning to targets, there should be no limits to our freedom of speech.
The Bill of Rights was specifically established to protect citizens from the government and its power. Our founding fathers based the Constitution off of freedom, and we shouldn’t be able to make adjustments to it because of how society views specific forms of communication. How would we even be able to justify what hate speech is in the eye of the law? Laws are created with the …show more content…
It’s human nature for us to feel that our opinion is superior to others, and to express those feelings. Freedom of speech allows us to speak up against unjust policies, which has impacted America greatly. Criticism is such a big part of today’s society, even television shows like “America’s Got Talent” are based around it. If individuals didn’t speak up for what they thought was wrong, African Americans or women wouldn’t have the rights we do today because of someone criticizing how a specific group was being treated. Censorship of communication is wrong because it stultifies a number of ideas that can be challenged or adopted. Controversy would arise about what is and isn’t considered hate speech that could lead to disagreement and sectionalism in
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    AP government research project
    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages

    AP government research project

    Argument #1:Should the first amendment protect hate speech? No, it should not protect hate speech. There are numerous lines drawn around our free speech already, and most Americans feel they are justified. For example, one cannot falsely yell “Fire” in the middle of a crowded theater. Just because we can say something, it doesn’t mean we should.…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Vandalized By Speech Summary
    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Vandalized By Speech Summary

    It is hard to go one day without seeing some form of hate speech. I see examples of it on social media platforms on a daily basis. People do not think about the negative effects that occurs because of what they said. Moreover, the people who face hate speech may feel angered or frustrated enough that they, too, perpetuate hate speech. People do not care to listen to those who claim hate speech is an issue because they think that the 1st Amendment gives them the right to say anything they want without consequences. The freedom of speech does not mean that you should say negative things to those of a different race or religion.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Bastard: The First Amendment Of The United States Constitution
    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Bastard: The First Amendment Of The United States Constitution

    The first Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and freedom of expression from government interference. This is one of the most important amendments in the constitution and is what America is most proud of. However, these rights aren’t all they are cracked up to be. For example, censorship is very common and goes against the freedom of speech. Censorship has many different roles in society both in the past and present. In the past it was used as a way for dictators to control their people and keep them from reading rebellious literature. Hitler even burned all books that he did not like.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Politically Incorrect Language Analysis
    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Politically Incorrect Language Analysis

    When the general public is asked to refrain from the use of a few words that may be offensive to others, the right to freedom of speech is not infringed upon. In most cases a group of concerned citizens vocalize the need to discontinue the use of a particular word that evokes discomfort in other citizens. For example, there is a campaign against the use of the word “retarded,” and it is called “Spread the Word to End the Word (Downes).” It is not required by law for every citizen of the United States to abstain from using the word “retarded,” so the right to freedom of speech has not been…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hate Speech On The Internet Should Be Regulated Analysis
    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hate Speech On The Internet Should Be Regulated Analysis

    The First Amendment to the United States Constitution, guarantees our freedom of expression, as it is written in the constitution, “The people shall not be deprived or abridged of their right to speak, to write, or to publish their statements; and the freedom of the press, one of the great bulwarks of liberty, shall be inviolable.” This clause is the based foundation of the articles: “Hate Speech on the Internet Should Be Regulated” by Ronald Eissens, and “Hate Speech on the Internet Should Not Be Regulated” by Sandy Starr, in which both authors reveled their opinions and standing on this issue by using different styles and presenting their ideas in different ways.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hate Speech Should Be Covered Under The First Amendment Essay
    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hate Speech Should Be Covered Under The First Amendment Essay

    Allowing people to speak freely is easy when what they say is not offensive. Being free to say things that offend or insult other groups of people may be necessary to challenge those in power or to identify problems within society. I am sure some would argue that hate speech serves no purpose but to offend and divide. To that argument, I would quickly point out that we should not be afraid of what people say, write, or think. You don't fight ideas by attempting to silence them. You fight them with better ideas. Also, who decides what is offensive? For example, if someone said, “I'm sick of Black people killing each other in Chicago”, some would find that offensive, but is that hate speech? We can easily say no, but it would not be our decision. Once a law is in place, those in charge decide how it is implemented. This is the other problem with limiting free speech, those in power would set and interpret the law. History is littered with examples of people gaining power then using that power to silence their…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hate Speech On Campus
    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hate Speech On Campus

    Free speech is one of the most controversial and confusing of the amendments. Throw it into a college campus setting and it’s an extremely complex matter, especially when “Hate Speech” is involved. Many people have different views and definitions on what hate speech in tales, for instance in “Hate Speech on Campus”, Joseph S. Tuman, defines it as “Written or spoken words directed towards a particular group (typically although not exclusively a minority group) with the purpose or effect of verbally harassing and harming them” (413). A personal interpretation of hate speech is speech that attacks a person or group on the basis of race, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. With this being said, hate speech is a form of free speech. By removing, or writing codes…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hate Speech And Internet Censorship
    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hate Speech And Internet Censorship

    Downing, in “’Hate Speech’ and ‘First Amendment absolutism’ discourses in the US,” makes many challenging arguments against the First Amendment right to freedom of speech, specifically when applied to hate speech. One of the best arguments against hate speech he makes is in the case of a minority group who are scared to speak against forms of oppression. “Thus women or ethnic minority groups with important stories to tell who do not tell them, are subject to what Jenson and Arriola sum up as ‘oppressive silencing’… In reality that [First] Amendment in no way protects their freedom to communicate, or their right to freedom from hate-based communication …” (Downing 179). It is true, especially online, that women and minorities speaking out against something will often be victims of hate speech. But no one has the right of freedom from hate based communication. When you expose yourself to the public in a controversial manner, you will be the focus of heated rhetoric, no matter what side you stand on. Pro-lifers who state something controversial on abortion online do not have the right to silence indecent speech opposing them, just like a Black Lives Matter protestor who states a controversial view on police officers cannot expect all reactions to be nice and encouraging. Another problem for hate speech ban advocates to consider is that hate speech itself is a matter of opinion. Liberals may not consider language that desecrates conservative Christianity as hate speech, the same way that many conservatives do not consider bashing radical feminist viewpoints with vulgarity as hate speech. On the internet, hate speech will only be more a matter of opinion. When someone posts something on the internet, it is frozen in time. This allows time for people to analyze it and judge it. If someone were to post something without thinking, a perfectly innocent comment, after evaluated by hundreds, could be seen as absolutely…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Hate Speech
    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Hate Speech

    In the first amendment of the United States constitution, American citizens are guaranteed the right to free speech. This is a fundamental right of American law, and one of the foundations of the U.S. Constitution. It is also the breeding ground for one of the most widely debated issues in America: What, if any, measures should be put into place to regulate hateful language? Most people will agree under one definition or another that hate speech is a socially deviant activity and worthy of some form of punishment. However, each person's definition of hate speech is different from the next. Some might say that there is no such thing as hate speech, and that because of the first amendment any and all speech should be allowed. However, there are laws against slander and libel, which make it a criminal action to defame any person in speech or writing. Some might say that any and all speech that is negative in any way towards any group is hate speech. However, many religious groups are opposed to homosexuality because of their religion, and are allowed to speak out and protest against it in the United States. Hate speech is defined by the American Heritage Dictionary as "Bigoted speech attacking or disparaging a social or ethnic group or a member of such a group." Under this definition, any person with strong and unyielding views on a subject that is speaking against another group in a hateful way is actively committing hate…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Freedom Of Speech Should Be Restricted Essay
    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Freedom Of Speech Should Be Restricted Essay

    There are both positive and negative sides of free speech. Some people want to protect it as a human right; while others argue that it is dangerous and should have limitations. All can see how complete freedom of speech without consequences can be a very dangerous thing. People have a right to express their opinions and feelings without fear. While Americans enjoy this freedom, some abuse it.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Importance Of Freedom Of Hate Speech
    • 167 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Importance Of Freedom Of Hate Speech

    When I first started research for this paper, I had the uneducated opinion that hate speech should be made illegal, regardless of freedom of speech. However, after reading the articles I’ve read, and reviewing the court cases ruled by the Supreme Court, I have come to the opinion that hate speech should be protected by the First Amendment. Even though hate speech is, in my opinion, deplorable, and should be condemned by us as a society, it should still be protected by the First Amendment and freedom of speech. Despite the awful actions and intentions of groups that use hate speech and the convoluted history of hate speech and its uses, it is still a Constitutional right. If we start limiting what is protected by the Constitution, then we…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hate Speech In Social Media
    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hate Speech In Social Media

    Now, more than ever, social media platforms are hubs for people to share trending articles, news stories, and columns and subsequently voice their opinion on them. If hate speech is defined as speech that attacks individuals and groups based on structural irreversible aspects of their identity, then it should be noted that many of these controversial articles are definitionally examples of hate speech. To restrict every instance of hate speech is to put social media users in monotonous bubbles; in echo chambers lacking any diversity of thought. That is the sort of safe space that is made the topic of political correctness in educational settings so prominent. By no means of advocating for rash, abrasive, and hurtful commentary to cloud the world wide web, if speech is constitutionally permissible and carries factual merit, then social media platforms are in no position to place restrictions. Providing the masses with as much information as possible, so long as that information is real prevents the kind of ignorance and closed-mindedness that causes divisive rhetoric to consume our present…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Lack Of Freedom Of Speech In The United States
    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Lack Of Freedom Of Speech In The United States

    I believe free speech is a part of America that makes it different and special than many other countries. It is something to be proud of and cherished, however not taken advantage of. It seems people are always toeing the line and seeing how far some laws can be pushed. As morally wrong as one may believe these things to be racism, sexism, and hate speech are permitted under free speech. I believe free speech should not be permitted no matter the consequences. I think speech that endangers others, and advocacy of violent political overthrow should not be allowed. Basically any type of speech that can lead to someone physically hurting themselves should be outlawed.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    first am
    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages

    first am

    Free speech is a fundamental value for a democratic society. In the article “ Free Speech: Westboro Church Supreme Court Case Tests First Amendment” from Christian Science Monitor (October 2, 2010), author Warren Richey discusses about the first amendment right and free speech implications in some court cases. The author mentions veriest leaders of large cults that propagate hateful speeches. He acknowledges cases like burning the American flag, a Nazi parade in the Jewish community , hurtful demonstrations against gay rights and tension between religions. I believe U.S. Government should not censor offensive speech because it gives us the freedom to express our views at given time and place, America will not be a truly free society,…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    in search of a better world
    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages

    in search of a better world

    We have big democracies like Australia, Germany or India, where people by and large take advantage of the certain liberties given to them. Free speech, that comes under the category of freedom of expression and is given to me and mostly all the residents of the democratic countries we have, well I say mostly because, the right to these kind of liberties may be restricted if a person is found guilty of a crime by a court of law. People take undue advantage of this and express their hatred through this medium. Hate speech is speech that offends, threatens, or else insults groups or individuals, based on their race, color, religion, national origin, any disability, or other traits.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics