Preview

Existentialism Is a Humanism

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1716 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Existentialism Is a Humanism
CONTEXT Sartre is trying to defend existentialism against some disapproval to it. The Communist criticized existentialism as an invitation to people to take interest in hopeless world affairs. On the other hand, Christians reproached from the fact that people deny the need of attention in human affairs. People have the will to do anything they want and wish. With the example given, about ignoring the Ten Commandments, we can people deny the value of following the commandments and will only follow it if they wish.

THE MEANING OF EXISTENTIALISM According to Sartre, existentialism is a principle that provides human life possible. It also determines that every truth and action we know involves both an environmental and a human subjectivity. The two types of existentialist are the Christians and Existential Atheists. What they have in common is that they both believe in “existence comes before essence”, which means that a human has no predetermined essence or nature. “Man is nothing else but that which he makes of himself.” If a man cannot define himself, then he is bound to happen that he is nothing. The paper-knife example talks about how an artisan conceptualized an object, how he paid close attention to it and knew what the purpose of the object would be. The paper-knife is existentially different from human because for Existential Atheists, which Sartre is included, man defines himself and not the creator that conceived him.

RESPONSIBILITY An implication given in the lecture is how a being would be able to existence would come before its essence even if God does not exist. Sartre mentioned that there is no human nature because we define ourselves and not by any force that lives inside us. By Sartre saying that “in choosing for himself, he chooses for all men”, he means that when humans make decisions, it affirms that value of which he had chosen. The choices we consider are always the better, and nothing can be better for us unless it is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Freedom plays a big part in being an existentialist, But Starkre explains freedom in a different way. When defined by Starkre freedom is the condition of human existence, not a characteristic of human nature. Our freedom is created by our experience, decisions and spontaneous actions in life. Starkre continues to say that nothing…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paul Sartre’s atheistic existentialism divides the world into 2 groups, authentic and inauthentic. Authentic people are distinguished by their deliberate choices to use their freedom to find purpose and meaning in their existence, while inauthentic people are characterized by passivity. John Gardner disagrees with moral relativism evidenced in Sartre’s existentialism and chooses to believe in moral absolutes. He portrays Grendel in his book Grendel as a condemnation of the moral relativism expressed by Jean Paul Sartre’s ideas of atheistic existentialism. Through Grendel 's experiences with contrasting religions and his philosophical mentors, Grendel chooses to embody Sartre’s idea of authenticity by terrorizing the people around him.…

    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Existentialism greatly supports free will, the idea that we are responsible in ourselves for our moral behaviour and it is our choices and actions that give us purpose. “It is only in our decisions that we are important.” Jean-Paul Sartre was a great believer in this: that everything depends on the individual and the meaning he gives to his life. He argued that all physical objects have an essence that…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phil 103 Final

    • 1037 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1F. The idea of existence preceding essence of Sartre is the basic principle of existentialism. This means that a personality is not built over a previously designed model or a precise purpose,…

    • 1037 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Final essay proposal

    • 832 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Existentialism dwells on the concept of absurdity in life. It focuses on the conflict between the constant and intense search for meaning and the inability to find it. Existentialism also admits that the world is dominated by pain, frustration, sickness, contempt, malaise and death. (Barnes 1962) This is the main ideology behind Jean-Paul Sartre’s work, “Existentialist Ethics”. The existentialist ideology began to flourish during the Second World War. However, the existential system of thought can be traced back to earlier thinkers such as Friedrich Nietzsche. Who is a German philosopher and considered as one of the most provocative and influential thinkers of the late nineteenth century who challenged the foundations of Christianity. (Robert Wicks, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) Nietzsche 's philosophy is that ' 'God is dead ' ' and he calls for a ' 'revaluation of all values ' ' in his book Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Both Nietzsche and Sartre are atheistic existentialists and agree that “God is dead”, and that human beings must take responsibility for their own actions. The philosophers have a lot of parallels between their thought, and also many differences. The purpose of the final essay is to show that although Nietzsche and Sartre are atheist philosophers, they have different interpretations of the death of God. The paper will also examine how both thinkers share a similar understanding of human freedom and the meaning of life.…

    • 832 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Sartre man is responsible for what he is. “Thus, one of the first effects of existentialism is that it puts every man in possession of himself, and it places the responsibility for his existence on his shoulders. When Sartre says that man is responsible for himself, he doesn’t just mean that man is responsible only for himself, but that he is also responsible for all men.”(Sartre) Sartre uses the example of war to show our individual choices and decisions, stating that to be involved in a war means that you had the choice to do so otherwise. Which means that we have always have a choice no matter what. Sartre argues that we are not constrained by past choices and we are free to do as we wish. Although this doesn't necessarily mean that we can do whatever we want. “Making a moral decision is not predetermined, so its value lies within itself.” (Sartre) But, this doesn’t mean that it is impossible for us to make mistakes. A human being is capable of making bad decisions . “To choose between this or that is at the same time to affirm the value of that which is chosen; for we are unable ever to choose the worse. What we choose is always the better; and nothing can be better for us unless it is better for all.” (Sartre)…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In it Sartre says: “His mother was living alone with him, deeply afflicted by the semi-treason of his father and by the death of her eldest son, and her one consolation was in this young man. But he, at this moment, had the choice between going to England to join the Free French Forces or of staying near his mother and helping her to live… Which is the more useful aim, the general one of fighting in and for the whole community, or the precise aim of helping one particular person to live? Who can give an answer to that a priori? No one. Nor is it given in any ethical scripture.”…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jean-Paul Sartre was a French existentialist philosopher and was one of the leading figures in 20th century French philosophy. His major philosophical work, “Being and Nothingness” and his famous talk, “Existentialism is a Humanism”, is where he emphasised the statement “Man is condemned to be free”.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Stranger

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The word “existentialism” is a general and extensive categorization that means many different things to a variety of people, and is often misused or overstated. As it is most frequently used, existentialism alludes to the concept that there is not a higher meaning to the world or to human existence, and no rational order to the events of the universe. According to a common definition of existentialism, man’s life is not invested with a supporting purpose, there is nothing beyond man’s physical existence…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No Exit Existentialism

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Existentialism is the basic requirement of people to take responsibility for their own choices. The concepts that define existentialism portrays the idea that people exist for a reason, and who a person is, what they do, and why they do it will eventually lead into a big role of these acts in their future, either in a good way or a bad way. Sartre points out that people make choices for themselves and they are the only ones that can pick right from wrong because they are the ones with the final decision. In No Exit, Sartre puts these characters into a single room where they are trapped, and he introduces this topic upon them. The room, is hell. The dialogues then unfold the reasons why they are in hell. The reasons are not the Christian sins they have committed, like in The Inferno, but the fact that they did not accept responsibility for their own choices, blaming it all instead on circumstances and others. Their private hell is not a religious version of hell, but an existentialist one based upon these key points. Their choices in life then leave them with Sartre’s unique form of punishment, leaving the three individuals to live with each other forever. Each mirroring the others own personal form of torture, hurting them both mentally and emotionally. With Sartre’s choice of words and actions in No Exit, we can see he is…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jean Paul Charles Aymard Sartre (1905 – 1980 ) is perhaps the most well known existentialist and played a key role in 20th century French philosophy and Marxism. Existentialism was formally introduced in the works of philosophers like Soren Kierkegaard, Friedrich Nietzsche, Edmund Husserl, and Martin Heidegger and can be traced to the late nineteenth / early twentieth century writers like Fyodor Dostoevsky and Franz Kafka. Though existentialism as a movement became popular in the mid-twentieth century through the works of Jean – Paul Sartre and prominent feminist theorist Simone de Beauvoir with whom he was openly in a relationship. Sartre’s version of existential philosophy developed under the influence of the German philosophers Husserl and Heidegger. His Being and Nothingness is a seminal work on existentialism. Sartre’s No Exit ( Huis – clos), written in 1944, foresees the Theatre of the Absurd. The Existentialist Theatre differs from the Theatre of the Absurd in the sense that the existentialist theatre expresses the incomprehensibility and the irrationality of the human condition in the form of a comprehensible and logically constructed reasoning, whereas the Theatre of the Absurd abandons the old dramatic conventions and goes on to invent a new form to express the new content. In the Absurdist plays, incomprehensibility and irrationality are reflected even in the form.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Further delving into the thought could be explained in defining essence as whatever we assign to ourselves then existence as the first thing that we are would conclude that we basically have to exist prior to the assignation of attributes to ourselves or other people.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Existentialist Freedom

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In Basic Writings of Existentialism, Jean-Paul Sartre provides readers with a life-questioning preposition on the freedom granted to man. According to existentialism, every individual has full and unlimited freedom in his or her life. The proposed notion that everyone must carry the weight of responsibility in every choice that they make, begins with Sartre’s concept of “existence precedes essence” This is the idea that man is brought into this world as a clean slate with no preconceived purpose; whom over the span of his life defines himself through his choices and experiences. Sartre states, “Man exists, turns up, appears on the scene, and only afterwards defines himself”(345). Existentialism bases its principles in the idea that there is no universal human nature for man to conform and live his life according to. Man is free to decide his own future, regardless of what his human condition was. Sartre elaborates on this concept, “Man is nothing else than his plan; he exists only to the extent that he fulfills himself; he is therefore nothing else than the ensemble of his acts, nothing else than his life”(355). Therefore, it is the individual’s obligation to…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Existentialism is a philosophical approach developed in 1940 to 1950 Soren Kierkegaard was the first existentialist philosopher. Friedrich Nietzsche, Martin Heidegger, Karl Jaspears, Gabriel Marcel and Jean Paul Sartre were the writers who also came under the influence of existentialism. These writers though had different doctrinal approaches but they shared the same belief that human being is not a mere observer of the real…

    • 2332 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    exisentialism

    • 1581 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the investigation of existentialism and its relevant philosophical ideas, I got impressed by those constructed men, resembling anti-heroes quite different from the traditional heroes, in those texts, Existentialism and Humanism by Jean-Paul Sartre, The Stanger and The Myth of Sisyphus by Albert Camus, The Ga Science by Friedrich Nietzsche, Dirge Without Music by Edna St. Vincent Millay, and The laws of God, the laws of man by A.E. Housman, which portray man as bereft of the traditional guideposts of morality and religion. Despite the lack of conventional heroic qualities like HYPERLINK http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morality o Morality morality and religion, anti-heroes always exist and differ from one another. As for me, Sartres version of the anti-hero would be most feasible in real life because his version of the anti-hero is less pernicious. In Sartres Existentialism and Humanism, one important principles of his existentialism is that existence precedes essence. Simply, it means that humanity is born with nothing without the human nature, the natural qualities and ways of behavior that most people have, due to the absence of God who is considered to define the mankind and give the human beings meaning and human nature. Since humanity faces the world without a dependence on God, we create who we are in form of actions. Thus, in creating ourselves, we create values and virtues and there are no preexisting virtues to guide us. I believe that Sartre thinks people have no obligation to comply with certain ethical standards or religious beliefs. Meanwhile people are free to choose, and thereby responsible for what they choose. But Sartre also indicates that humanity is condemned to be free because in choosing for himself a person chooses for all men. In other words, since each individual is also responsible for all human beings, the human beings are not absolutely free to choose and act. However, the problem why each individual is responsible for all human beings…

    • 1581 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays