Preview

Exposing Children to Profanity

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1764 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Exposing Children to Profanity
The United States Constitution gives Americans many rights. One of those rights is the freedom of speech. A controversy has erupted in the United States because the government is unable to determine the limitations on this right. "In early America when our forefathers wrote the Constitution, profanity was not accepted" (Shoeder 72). This makes determining the true definition of "speech" difficult. A majority of people believe profanity is an acceptable form of language. These people feel that they are free to say what they want without worrying about the rights of others. Due to this insensitivity, a child has a hard time walking down a street without hearing offensive words. For example, there is a man standing on a street corner harassing another person. The child hears profane words used by the man, and from this the child relates anger with profanity. Another example is a woman seen arguing with a cashier using profanity in an attempt to get her way, and the child with her begins to believe that to get your way you must cruse. A third example is a waitress having a bad day, and taking it out on the customers the child in the booth next to the customers and the waitress is thinking that this is a proper way to communicate. All of these examples are using improper language for children to hear (Shoeder 72). Parents are then expected to explain and make excuses for the vocabulary being used by others. Profanity has become uncontrollable and has had a great role in the moral decay of our society. The main goal for parents and government officials should be the regulation of profanity in the United States.<br><br>Adults are formed through the experiences of their childhood. The way a person acts and speaks is often determined at a young age. When a parent uses profanity, a child may feel free to also use these words. For instance, a mother may not intentionally use profanity when cutting her finger while in the kitchen. As a result of the mother 's action, a child


Cited: </b><br><li>Golanski, Candace. "Rating the fun stuff." Popular Science Dec. 5, 1994: 16.<br><li>Hochman, David. "Do you kiss your mother with that mouth?" US June 1994: 29-30.<br><li>Levee, Michael A. "In the Cursed '90 's, Expletives Are Seldom Deleted." Chicago Tribune Nov. 6 1992: sec 1: 1+.<br><li>Maurer, Sandra Flahive. "Mind your tongue, young man." Newsweek Oct. 17, 1994: 19.<br><li>Montville, Leigh. "Point After: Stop Reading Those Lips!" Sports Illustrated Oct. 29, 1990: 98.<br><li>Rowe, Chip. " 'Male dicta ' Favors the Whole Truth." Washington Journalism Review Jan. 1993: 14-16. <br><li>Schoeder, Ken. "Education Briefs: Getting Your Words 'Worth." Educational Digest Mar. 1992: 72-73.<br><li>Wolff, Alexander. "Offensive back." Sports Illustrated Dec. 5, 1994: 16.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    When do offensive words addressed by one person to another in a public place exceed the limits of free speech guarantee of the First Amendment to U.S. Constitution and incur criminal liability for one who speaks them?…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    School Board of Norfolk, 801 F.Supp. 1526 (E.D. Va. 1992). Here, a middle school student, Kimberly Broussard, wore a t-shirt that read “Drugs Suck”. Her parents sued on her behalf claiming that her shirt was a form of free speech protected by the First Amendment of the United States. Here, the courts ruled in favor of the school board, saying that although the shirt displayed an anti-drug message, the word “suck” was considered a vulgar word with a sexual connotation and therefore not allowed in school because it interfered with the classroom learning environment. Id. at…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    First, society has an interest in protecting kids (especially those in the audience) from lewd , vulgar , and sexually explicit speech. Also, schools have a duty to teach student speakers the “habits and manners of civility” essential to democratic governance. Schools must teach students to responsibly consider the sensibilities of others, even when exercising their right to express unpopular viewpoints. Schools may reasonably conclude the boundaries of socially appropriate behavior cannot adequately be taught to students in an environment where the right to communicate in lewd, vulgar, and sexually explicit terms are absolute. Therefore, schools can constitutionally punish students for vulgar and lewd speech inconsistent with their educational…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scott Simmon states that "profanity can remind us of the power of words convey intense emotion". The power released through profanity causes the receiver to understand the seriousness of the situation. Whether angry or hurt, the use of profanity adds that extra power or force to help get your point seen, heard and most importantly understood.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The politically correctness of language is infringing on our First Amendment rights, but is it right to protect our freedom of speech when it causes verbal harassment to others? There is no way to limit what can be said, no way to restrict language used by others. Yes, we can state that it is politically incorrect, but that will not stop people from using words to hurt others. It is a vicious cycle that has no…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    This language restricts government’s ability to constrain the speech of citizens, however, the prohibition on abridgment of the freedom of speech is not absolute. Notwithstanding the often broad freedom of expression guaranteed by the First Amendment, there are some historically rooted exceptions, as the Supreme Court has identified categories of speech that are not protected by the First Amendment and may be prohibited entirely. Among these categories are “fighting words” and words and actions that create an incitement of violence, both of which lay beyond the shield of First Amendment protection. I. Background In 1942, the United States Supreme Court established the “fighting words” doctrine by a 9-0 decision in Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, where the Court held that fighting words “by their very utterance inflict injury or tend…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Spanking Research Paper

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Picture this scenario, you and your three year old daughter are walking through Wal-Mart. She spots a toy that she really wants. Your daughter asks if you’ll buy if for her. Now, you’re on a budget. You have only enough money to purchase the items you absolutely need. You tell her no. This is when all hell breaks loose. She starts kicking and screaming. Your daughter rolls on the floor crying and shouting that she wants it. What do you do? In today’s society the only socially acceptable response you may have, especially in public, is to pull her aside, and give her a stern talk. Discuss with her why she can’t have the toy. Explain in terms she can understand, why it is wrong to throw a temper tantrum. Now, when I was little, if I threw a tantrum in the store my mother would pull me aside, and whoop me. She would tell me that she said no, and that’s final. How has our society evolved to the point where properly disciplining your child is wrong?…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    swdsdsd

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. The First Amendment grants each citizen the right to freely express him or herself as he or she chooses. This is not without restraint. Network television and radio have the right to censor offensive content. NBC will never show full-frontal nudity. WWNO will never broadcast “bad” words. There are also restrictions for the sake of public safety. One can be arrested for yelling “fire” in a crowded theater because the panicked reaction might cause injury or death. This kind of rule has also caused great debate on whether the instructions to…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite originating in early 1990, the term political correctness did not gain notable traction until more recent years. Today the term political correctness is aimlessly thrown about in the political arena from both sides of the aisle-but what does the term truly mean? Does it achieve its purpose? To fully understand the complexities surrounding this ideology, one must first examine the raw intention and foundation of the term. Political correctness is wildly accepted as the avoidance of expressions, actions, or microaggressions that can be perceived to offend, marginalize, or exclude specific groups of people who are inherently socially disadvantaged and/or discriminated against. However well intended the terms roots may be, political correctness in America has rose to a dangerously high level; the unwavering effort by the politically correct conscious to avoid offending any certain group or individual has lead to a highly sensitive, censored, and tip-toeing society.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    College Censorship Rules

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Crippling the delivery of unpopular views is a terrible lesson to send to impressionable minds and future leaders” (Rampell 1). This quote taken from Catherine Rampell in her article “Free speech is flunking out on college campuses” explains that strict censorship rules hurt students whose minds are still developing. Rules on censorship in a college setting are supposed to protect the rights of students. Censorship is supposed to protect them from extremely hate filled speeches, newspaper articles, and other documents. For example, defamation, lies, and uses of extremely hateful name calling such as the word “nigger,” are all applicable to fair censorship rules. Today, the power of censorship has grown strong. In a scramble to not offend anyone,…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First Amendment Speech

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In our bill of rights, the first amendment we have the freedom of speech. People speak their mind and sometimes don’t have enough words to explain so they turn to the vulgar words. Shoot even kids curse. One curses and doesn’t even realize. But what if it slips out during church?…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are people that degrade others online by cursing or using language that can hurt the person's feelings. Even though what they are saying is not true, the words make the person feel like they don’t belong. Those people should not be protected under the First Amendment because they are intentionally hurting someone else. A person does not have the right to express themselves if what they're saying has a negative impact on others. For example, if you were in the debate and someone started to curse you out making you feel useless this not something that the first amendment should protect. Another example would be when kids in school use foul language towards the teacher. This is disrespectful and impolite to do to a teacher. This is not considered to be freedom of speech because if a student does this they are punished by being expelled or suspended. The interpretation of freedom of speech is different for everyone and that's why limits should be created on the First…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Swearing Ethical Analysis

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In an Everyday Ethics Podcast titled Foul Language with podcaster, Craig Kopp, media ethicist, Kelly McBride, and medical ethicist, Art Caplan, they discuss whether swearing is ethical (“About”). Using an example throughout being Anthony Scaramucci, a previous Director of Communication at the White House, who use six f-bombs and multiple other swear word when talking to a reporter. But why do people swear in the first place? To assert authority and power, to seem dominant, or to influence. Kelly stated it as a “Crude animalistic thing to do,” being that it can be used as a survival tool.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A personal example of this happened one day at lunch when I was a freshman. There was a group of boys that sit behind us every day that constantly cuss. Most of these boys were the same age as me with only a few juniors as exceptions. They were arguing about something stupid and the only words coming out of their mouths that weren’t cuss words were simple words like is and were. After trying, and failing, to block them out I finally turned around and politely asked them to stop cussing. They told me to shut up and leave them alone because they had a right to say whatever they want.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Taboo Language

    • 3048 Words
    • 13 Pages

    All languages have words that are considered taboo – words that are not supposed to be said or used. Taboo words or swearwords, can be used in many different ways and they can have different meanings depending on what context they appear in. Another aspect of taboo words is the euphemisms that are used in order to avoid obscene speech. This paper will focus on the f-word which replaces the word fuck, and as the study will show it also have other meanings and usages.…

    • 3048 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics