Preview

Freedom of Speech?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1794 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Freedom of Speech?
Randa Nakib
Final Draft
Essay 1

Freedom Of Speech?

Living in America means that we as citizens of the country have many rights according to the laws stated in the United States Constitution, which stands for our principles and make up the rights that American 's deserve. One major freedom we have is stated in The First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." This amendment shows that our government should not be allowed to put limitations on the people 's right to express themselves through free speech and religion. We as citizens have the right to voice our opinions as long as we do not cause harm while doing so. This is a reason why many people from around the world choose to come to America, for their right to freedom. The first amendment should apply to everyone who lives in the United States, but in some cases it does not.
In a recent case, a teenage boy 's right to exercise his freedom of speech was challenged by his high school. He wore an "anti-gay" t-shirt to school on the day of, and also on the day after, the Gay-Straight Alliance group organized a "day of silence". The boy, Tyler Chase Harper, was asked to remove his t-shirt, which he handwrote on the front: "I will not accept what God has condemned," and "homosexuality is a sin", on the back (Soto). Because Harper refused to remove his t-shirt, he was sent to the office by his teacher and had to speak to the principal. He again refused to remove the shirt after meeting with the principal, which resulted in being detained in the front office all day. Also, the year before this, Poway High School had a problem with the "Day of Silence"; this led the students to react by getting into arguments and even some physical confrontations throughout the day.



Cited: California. The Ninth Circuit. United States Court of Appeals. Appeal for the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. 20 Apr. 2006. 15 Feb. 2008 <www.uscourts.gov>. "Constitutional Law-Freedom of Speech--Ninth Circuit Upholds Public School 's Prohibition of Anti-Gay T-Shirt 's." The Harvard Law Review 120 (2007): 1691-1698. 14 Feb. 2008 <http://search.ebscohost.com>. "Harper V. Poway Unified School District." National School Board Association. 15 Feb. 2008 <www.nsba.org>. Soto, Onell R. "Lawsuit Over Anti-Gay Shirt Can Proceed, Judge Decides." The San Diego Union-Tribune 06 Nov. 2004. 17 Feb. 2008 <www.signonsandiego.com>. Taylor, Kelley R. "Another Free-Speech Court Case Off T-Shirts." The Education Digest. Nov. 2006. 17 Feb. 2008 <www.eddigest.com>.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bethel V Fraser

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On April 26, 1983, Matthew Fraser gave a speech nominating another student for an elected position. The speech was given to about 600 fourteen year olds that chose to attend this assembly. The speech contained sexual innuendo. Before giving the speech Fraser received advise from several teachers that he should change the speech or not give one at all. But he refused to take their advice (2). The next day, he was called in to an administrative office and was suspended for three days and was told he would not be able to give his speech during graduation even though he was at the time the salutatorian. The family of Fraser filed a grievance with the Pierce County school board, but the officer upheld the suspension. In response, to that decision Matthew’s father filed a case against the school district. The District Court ruled that the student’s First Amendment right was infringed upon. The students was awarded a monetary judgment and allowed to give his graduation speech. Later, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the judgment of the District Court (4). Later, the US Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals in a 7-2 vote to reinstate the suspension, saying that the school district's policy did not violate the First Amendment (3).…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    403 v. Fraser, and Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier. Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser is a case almost identical to this one and is a clear representation of how the Supreme Court should rule regarding this situation. In this case, to nominate a classmate for elective office, made a speech including many sexual metaphors to an assemble of 600 students. The Bethel School District saw this a violation of their disciplinary code and so Fraser was suspended for 2 days. This case was ruled 7-2 in favor of the school district.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, after viewing North Fargo High School’s student handbook, Mr. Renville’s senior portrait clearly violated the school guidelines which state: “No student will knowingly possess, handle, carry, or transmit any weapon or dangerous instrument in any school building, on school grounds, in any school vehicle or at any school-sponsored activity.4” .The image Renville provided clearly violates the school guidelines and does not pass the “Tinker Test”, therefore the ruling delivered in Tinker v Des Moines independent Community School District does not apply to the supposed infringement on Renville’s freedom of speech…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The majority opinion claimed that the principal did the right thing in removing the pages before printing. It argued that it did not violate student’s rights, but on the other hand it protected the parents in the divorce article and the identities in the pregnancy article. By protecting the rights of others, he was also protecting the rights of those individual students mentioned in the articles and the school’s image. The minority opinion claims that the articles removed still represented individual student views. Those who argued the dissenting opinion justified it by expressing concern over what permitting censorship will do in the long run. For instance, if censorship was permitted in this case, it would set a precedent for general student censorship with…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Bethel School District v. Fraser a lot happened. In my understanding there was a school event in which students gave speeches. The one student gave a speech with language unaccepted in the school, and got suspended, and was not allowed to be voted in for the election. The Father got angry and believed that his sons amendment rights were being violated. He felt like his sons first amendment right of freedom of speech was being withheld from him, along with his fourteenth amendment right. The case first went to a general court and it could not be agreed upon, so in tern it went to the Supreme Court because it could not be agreed upon in the lower court system and was to controversial. The court case was taken extremely seriously because it could change school rights, as they were known.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parties involved: John F. Tinker and Mary Beth Tinker, minors, by their father and next friend, Leonard Tinker and Christopher Eckhardt, minor, by his father and next friend, William Eckhardt v. The Des Moines Independent Community School District…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tinker vs. Des Moine

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1969, Des Moines Iowa school districts, it was fine to wear the iron cross to support Nazis but it was not okay to wear arm bands to support stopping the Vietnam War. (“Tinker V. Des Moines” 3) When students wore the arm bands they were asked to go home and suspended from school. This set up the case for Tinker v. Des Moines independent school district, a case that would determine the right of free speech for students. This case can be better understood by studying the Des Moines independent schools, students and their policies, examining the decision of the court and, reflecting on how it has influenced society today.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    School Board of Norfolk, 801 F.Supp. 1526 (E.D. Va. 1992). Here, a middle school student, Kimberly Broussard, wore a t-shirt that read “Drugs Suck”. Her parents sued on her behalf claiming that her shirt was a form of free speech protected by the First Amendment of the United States. Here, the courts ruled in favor of the school board, saying that although the shirt displayed an anti-drug message, the word “suck” was considered a vulgar word with a sexual connotation and therefore not allowed in school because it interfered with the classroom learning environment. Id. at…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Supreme Court struck the delicate balance between maintaining an ordered school environment and inculcating First Amendment values within students in four cases, which together defined the boundaries of student-expression rights. The first of these cases, Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District has been called the “magna carta of student’s expression rights.” The events in Tinker occurred in 1965 during the controversy of the Vietnam War. In Des Moines, Iowa, a group of adults and students objected to the Vietnam conflict by wearing black armbands. Principals in the area heard of these intentions and, “[feeling] that ‘the schools [were] no place for demonstrations,’” prohibited students from wearing black armbands to school. John and Mary Beth Tinker wore black armbands to school and were suspended when they refused to remove them. The Court held the prohibition and punishment an unconstitutional deprivation of the student’s expression rights because school officials could not of reasonably forecasted substantial disruption of school…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Morse V. Frederick

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages

    n/a. (2007, June 25). Aclu slams supreme court decision in student free speech case . Retrieved from http://www.aclu.org/free-speech/aclu-slams-supreme-court-decision-student-free-speech-case…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Bong Hits for Jesus”

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In my ruling, the illegal glorification of the drug culture “Bong hits for Jesus”. I feel the school had made a bad judgment call about having the banner. I feel it is not an attack on the saying “Bong hits for Jesus”. I feel that this is an attack on the student’s first amendment rights, just because the sign had something to do with marijuana. The school has an anti- drug program. I believe a non- disruptive pin, shirt, banner, etc. should not be taking from a student, for the shear fact that they oppose the anti-drug programs that the school offers. It is an attack on their first amendments rights. It was a 15-foot joke. The school dose has the right to not tolerate an interruption of a school sponsored anti-drug event. But this was not this kind of an event and the banner was not placed on school grounds. The banner was placed across the street from the school in a public open forum. One cannot be punished for holding of a banner not on school property. I feel that the principal was wrong to hastily take the banner down in the heat of the moment, but feel she should not pay punitive damages, for the banner was not worth much. Though the pride of the student’s who put the banner up was hurt a little I feel they should not be punished for expressing their first amendment rights, which they demonstrated non-violently, very conformed manner, and not on school property.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This Court held that student expression may not be suppressed unless school official reasonably conclude that it will “… materially and substantially interfere with the requirements of appropriate disciple in the operation of the school.” Tinker at 513 (1969). The problem posed by the case at bar relates to the level of disruption caused by the production of the parody profile. If there is any sense of disruption, the school would have to believe that there was “substantial” interference. The profile page was widely viewed by students outside of the school and by students on their personal cellphones while at school. The viewing of the profile outside of school did not cause any disruption to the operation of the school. There is no indication that the viewing of the profile during school disrupted the work of the school or any class. Tinker displayed that the Petitioners went about their day completely normally. The only change was the black band on their sleeves. They neither interrupted school activities nor disrupted in the school’s operation. Tinker concluded that, “In the circumstances, our Constitution does not permit officials…

    • 1938 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hollingsworth V. Perry

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cited: "The Constitution of the United States of America: Amendments 11-27." Archives.org. N.p., n.d. Web. Garrison, Jessica. "Supreme Court Keeps California in Suspense on Gay Marriage."Latimes.com. Los Angeles Times, 3 Dec. 2012. Web. 4 Dec. 2012. "Lawrence v. Texas." Casebriefs.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 04 Dec. 2012. "Proposition 8 Decision." Hrc.org. Human Rights Campaign, 26 May 2009. Web. 4 Dec. 2012. "Romer v. Evans." Casebriefs.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 04 Dec. 2012.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One case is Papish v. Board of Curators of the University of Missouri (1973), 410 U.S. 667. In this case Barbara Papish, a 32-year-old graduate journalism student at the University of Missouri, was expelled for distributing in the heart of a campus newspaper containing assuredly indecent speech. (Senat, 2013) The newspaper cartoon Papish published did not state any violence nor had true threats. University of Missouri did not have the right to expel Papish based on the fact the cartoon had offensive language. The courts filed in the favor of Papish. Papish case used reference from Healy v. James, in which the Court had alleged that even though a state university could enforce reasonable rules governing student conduct, "state colleges and universities are not enclaves immune from the sweep of the First Amendment (Senat, 2013)." Papish cartoon was protected because it did not promote threats nor…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the dispute of flag burning has come before the Supreme Court several times in the past several decades, “on June 11, 1990, the Supreme Court once again ruled that burning the flag was an example of constitutionally protected free speech” as…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays