Preview

Functionalist Perspective On America's Education In The United States

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1094 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Functionalist Perspective On America's Education In The United States
America’s Education

In the United States, from kindergarten until we are sixteen, it is required by law that we attend school full time. Some people go on to further their education by attending a college, University or trade school after high school. School comes easier to some people than to others. This is the problem with our country’s educational system, not everyone is getting a good enough education. The major social problem that the current educational system breeds is establishing and then reinforcing social stratification.
In sociology, functionalism is known as a structural theory. Functionalists see society as a whole being structured like the anatomy of a human body with many interconnected systems that function together to sustain a healthy body. Functionalists argue that in order to have a strong society, each individual must obey the social norms and standards of the society. Each person is socialized into obeying these “social norms” that are at the core that makes up the social structure. Society needs to convey social coherence and education plays a vital role in working to accomplish this.
To understand America’s education system, we must first contemplate how it adds to the healthy conservation of the entire social system. French sociologist Emile Durkheim, who primarily expressed a functionalist perspective in
…show more content…
Contradicting this perspective, our next outlook on society is categorized by conflicting views rather than unanimity. This is referred to as conflict theory, where societal norms and standards are not equally shared or accepted among the members of society. Karl Marx is a sociologist who implemented this theory of social conflict, to which it is now coined Marxism. Marx believes that there is conflict between various groups and that society is highly structured. These structures form a hierarchical compartmentalization of groups and with that, comes

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Mr Stefan Sledmore

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Functionalism is a structural theory based on value consensus. Functionalists believe that in order to achieve solidarity, society has two key mechanisms, ‘Socialisation’ and ‘Social Control.’ ‘Socialisation’ is the process by which we learn the norms and values of society, firstly through the family and then through other institutions such as education. ‘Social Control’ means the formal ways of insuring people conform to the mainstream norms and values of society.…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Functionalism- The functionalist perspective describes society like the human body, in the sense that society as a whole has social institutions to help it run smoothly these are education, family and the law. When one of the parts fails or shuts down the rest suffer and society is not running…

    • 659 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    SOC 101

    • 1844 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Functionalist Perspective is a sociological perspective that emphasizes each part of society contributing to the survival of that society. In Sociology in Modules, they define the functionalists perspective as, “A sociological approach that emphasizes the way in which the parts of a society are structured to maintain its stability (Schaefer 15).” The functionalist perspective can be compared to the human body model. Each part of the body performs specific tasks. For example, our legs allow us to walk or run and our lungs allow us to breathe. Without each and every body part, one simply cannot perform to the maximum potential. Now when a functionalist is looking at a society, they may see different social groups that contribute to a larger population.…

    • 1844 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Throughout the course of our class we have read about many scholars and their thoughts on the schooling system. Our first author we read about was Rebecca Cox, a professor who thinks not only schooling should be improved but our entire political system as well, and her book The College Fear Factor explains exactly that. The second author discussed was Hsun Tzu who thinks that the goal of education should be to make a person who is truly consistent, but says that this takes time and comes with the experience of truly learning rather than relying just on memory. Freire was next and his thoughts on the schooling system are similar to Cox’s. He thinks students are seen more as objects rather than the subject and this is holding back our next generations…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    unit 7

    • 3346 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Functionalism: According to the functionalist perspective of sociology, each aspect of society is interdependent and contributes to society's stability and functioning as a whole. For example, the government provides education for the children of the family, which in turn pays taxes on which the state depends to keep itself running. The family is dependent upon the school to help children grow up to have good jobs so that they can raise and support their own families.…

    • 3346 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Defense of Elitism

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The dominant theme in this essay appears to be this: post war social changes such as offering increased university admission promote the view of egalitarianism in education. The author's main issue with "secondary" education is the sheer numbers of our population that the United States as a whole educates.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Education empowers and educates generation after generations. What is the result of educational standards not being met? In his essay, “America Skips School,” Benjamin R. Barber explains his views on America’s education crisis. In his essay, he talks about the absence of actions the government and society take regarding education. He expresses his views on the rise of illiteracy in America. The rising complacency in formal education leads(contributes) to an education crisis.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conflict theory developed largely from the work of Karl Marx suggests that society is in a state of eternal conflict due to competition for limited resources. Conflict theory also states that social order is maintained by domination and power. Society consists of people who struggle against each other in an attempt to satisfy their own needs and wants. Conflict theory argues that social change will occur when individuals and social groups reach a breaking point thus creating social change. Conflict theorists argue that stratification is dysfunctional and harmful and it results in competition between bourgeois and proletarians.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three theoretical perspectives are functionalism, conflict theory, and the insurrectionist perspective, which help serve as a means of helping frame research. Functionalism, also known as structural functionalism, sees society as a complex network working together in balance. Those who study functionalism examin society by contemplating what each separate part of the network does to help society work in harmony. Functionalist view society as a well-functioning self-sufficient machine. The functionalism theory is very broad in that it tries to explain all the parts of human society . Functionalism serves a very important part in sociology because most sections of society have a purpose in the network. The explanation for social change is challenging for functionalist because of “The assumption…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Educational Reform

    • 2855 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The United States has an extensive educational system that has been charged with accommodating the needs of an extensively diverse student population. U.S. educational institutions exist at all learning levels, from preschools for early childhood education to secondary education for youths, and post secondary education for both young and older adults. Education in the United States can be commended for the many goals it aspires to accomplish—promoting democracy, assimilation, nationalism, equality of opportunity, and personal development. However, because Americans have historically insisted that schools work toward these frequently conflicting goals, education has often found itself at the center of social conflict and the hot topic of political campaigns, mostly to no avail (Goldin and Katz, 2001). While schools are expected to achieve many social objectives, education in America is neither centrally administered nor supported directly by the federal government, unlike education in other industrialized countries. This system of decentralization has created a system of inequality in education that persists. The current system has created inequalities that have culminated into a generation of students that are not adequately prepared to meet the demands of a global workforce. Moreover, students in the current U.S. educational system are unmotivated and resistant to change due to irrelevant legislation and an overwhelmed system. The inequalities and inconsistencies have spawned many debates in the U.S. as the nation joins the global community (Goldin et.…

    • 2855 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sociological Perspective

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Firstly, functionalists believe that society is viewed as a “system of interconnected parts” that works collectively in order to sustain a sense of social balance within the world. For example, each of the social institutions is responsible for providing essential functions to society: Family is seen as accountable for “reproducing, nurturing and socialising children”, whereas education provides…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Journal Entry 1

    • 767 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In my opinion conflict and consensus forms the center of all human society. In the term of understanding human behavior and its constraints, nothing can be ore opposite then consensus and conflict theory. Consensus stresses what social groups have in common, while conflict stresses the fact that different groups have different access to power and wealth. It is hard to just pick conflict or consensus to discuss about because both of the philosophers have a different view on cultural and society. Karl Marx is known to be the father of the social conflict theory. His main concern was conflicts between different classes. Which leads back to the journal topic of having different networks of social relations. People may have a lot of socials relations but they usually are between the people of the same classes. Marx didn’t agree with people of different classes fighting and arguing over things but sadly this is how life works and it is something that is hard to change. Emile Durkheim looked at society in a different way then Marx did. He believed that members of society were in consensus with one another, and they all wanted the same goals and had the same attitudes. He relates…

    • 767 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Conflict theories are perspectives in social science that emphasize the social, political, or material inequality of a social group, that critique the broad socio-political system, or that otherwise detract from structural functionalism and ideological conservativism. Conflict theories draw attention to power differentials, such as class conflict, and generally contrast historically dominant ideologies. It is therefore a macro level analysis of society. Karl Marx is the father of the social conflict theory, which is a component of the 4 paradigms of sociology. Certain conflict theories set out to highlight the ideological aspects inherent in traditional thought. Whilst many of these perspectives hold parallels, conflict theory does not refer to a unified school of thought, and should not be confused with, for instance, peace and conflict studies, or any other specific theory of social conflic…

    • 1986 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx, saw society as fragmented into groups that compete for social and economic resources. He believed that social order is maintained by domination, with power in the hands of those with the greatest political, economic, and social resources. When consensus exists, it is attributable to people being united around common interests, often in opposition to other groups. This perspective emphasizes social control, not consensus and conformity. Groups and individuals advance their own interests, struggling over control of societal resources. Those with the most resources exercise power over others with inequality and power struggles resulting. There is great attention paid to class, race, and gender in this perspective because they are seen as the grounds of the most pertinent and enduring…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Sociology is the study of groups of people. Karl Marx was a theorist who largely contributed to the study of sociology by purposing the Conflict Theory . The Conflict Theory is one of the major sociological models for understanding the social world. The Conflict Theory is constructed of three components: The first component is that conflict is a common and ongoing issue in the social world. The second component is that society is built on the conflicting morals and interests of many different social groups. Finally, the third component states that all social conflict occurs between dominant and subordinate social groups who are completing against one another for something they feel is a worthy cause. Marx believed that tension and conflict are the two theories that motivated people and effected how they behave. The conflict theory assumes that institutions and interactions within society foster inequality and competition…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics