Preview

Gay Marriage

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
634 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gay Marriage
Alissa Mincey
September 24, 2012
EH 101
Jones
“The Case for (Gay) Marriage Response” - Blended Response
Gay marriage discussions are highly present in our society. Student writer, A.J. Chavez argues that not only should marriage occur between a man and a woman, but also the same sex. He articulates his thoughts on how if the same sex feels the same way a straight couple feels, and then it shouldn’t be a problem. However, our society uses religious views and traditional morals to restrain gay marriage. Apparently, we as a nation are indecisive on this issue today. The student writer states valid arguments and backs it up completely. In Chavez’s essay, he argues his point of view on gay civil unions. His argument begins with, “What if this was a gay world, and you were straight?” This gives the reader an idea from their own perspective on how it would be if he or she was in that predicament. He states in his first argument that the legalization of gay marriage will establish equality for all. I completely agree because the gay society is very much discriminated today. They don’t have the rights he or she wants to receive.
One of my favorite points of this article, is his point if gay marriage was legalized, religious communities would continue to do as it please. For myself, being Catholic if we are married and choose to divorce we will not be blessed for a second marriage. In some situations marriages do not work because of cheating, abuse, and etc. This comes down to the rights of people again. If he or she feels that a marriage is not working and they want a divorce it is their decision. Even though, I am Catholic if I ever come to a situation where I am not happy in my marriage I will divorce. It is my life and how I live it is my decision not another. Gay people have an opinion as everyone else does. They aren’t different from us therefore, we as a society need to stop compelling with this idea we have.
However, Chavez’s viewpoints are valid. Such

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In fact, to prove his point Olson used a powerful and compelling argumentation in favor of gay marriage. He enlightened the reader that this issue is not only a social problem but it involves culture, history, and tolerance of the peoples’ differences. His paper has strong persuasive arguments that are well measured, methodical, well evidenced and critical. The author states that he is a conservative person however; on this issue he takes a liberal state of mind. He is clearly subjective in his writing for he shares in paragraph 26 the reactions to his lawsuit. “I have certainly heard anger, resentment and hostility, and words like “betrayal” and other pointedly graphic criticism.” The paper is well focused on its goal and honest for it is sure not easy for Olson to criticize his loyal conservative friends and act against their believes when he actually belongs to that party. Moreover, Mr. Olson's rhetorical repetitive question “… on the basis of their sexual orientation?” in paragraphs 8 and 13 is used to emphasize the importance of acceptance of others and overcoming the differences when it comes to the sexual orientation which is a very private matter. He also shocks the reader by ending his article stating that the gay marriage is not an issue about opened and so called closed minded people but it is an American issue, thus relating this topic to all Americans all…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Citing a recent court ruling that allowed a gay individual to stay in his partner’s rent controlled apartment after his partner passed away, thus qualifying the individual as a member of the deceased partner’s family, Sullivan uses many sagacious points that most readers can relate to. His choice of words and examples make it seem that he is passionate about this issue and the preservation of the family unit in general. Sullivan makes a prudent argument as to what could be gained by encouraging loving, committed relationships. Legalizing gay marriage would promote social acceptance, the same economic advantages and relationship security between two people who love one another. This would also encourage a deeper commitment that is harder to get out of. Also pointed out is that legalizing gay marriage would not jeopardize the legitimacy of traditional, straight marriage. Allowing the same rights to fellow individuals could only help to promote that which we all hold dear, family…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He uses the quote to state that tradition marriage is being destroyed because of same-sex marriage. Then he asserts that gay-marriage is a new trend that will pass and that in every new trend that comes we “lose our moral sense.” In addition, he believes that same-sex couples have been using the political system to their advantage to achieve their goal even though their cry for legal marriage has been defeated in court numerous times. He indicates that religious groups would be sued for “discrimination.” To supports his argument, he uses a lawsuit case in which a an adaptation agency, Catholic Charities, was sued for refusing to allow “foster children with same-sex couples.” Furthermore, he uses another case in which a polygamist in Utah filed a lawsuit to allow him to marry more than one wife, to assert the assumption that “if same-sex marriage is allowed, no one will ever be able to say ‘no’ to anything…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The topic of same sex marriage is one that causes great debate in today’s society. There are many views on weather it should or should not be allowed and the effects it could have on the United States if it were allowed. The debate has been an ongoing one and as more states begin contemplating legalization the debates have become more heated. In an article written by Katha Pollitt, entitled What’s Wrong with Gay Marriage? , she argues for the legalization of same sex marriage making a multitude of valuable points. In an opposing article entitled Gay “Marriage”: Societal Suicide by Charles Colson her argues in opposition against same sex marriage using statistics and history to make his valid points. Both writers argue their points exceptionally but Pollitt’s essay is the better one as it is incredibly fair and reasonable and argues the opposition’s points perfectly.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Still another key assumption in Sullivan 's article is that having gay marriage legalized would give homosexuals greater hope about the future. He says, "It provides role models for young gay people, who after the exhilaration of coming out can easily lapse into short-term relationships and insecurity with no tangible goal in sight" (285). Here again, it would be helpful to have references to several authoritative studies or expert opinions, but these are singularly…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the world has developed-and is still developing- controversial topics like gay marriage are still prominent is today’s society. William J. Bennett, an influential figure in America, strongly voiced out his standpoint on the topic of same-sex marriage through his article “Against Gay Marriage.” His concerns persistently argue that the rights for gay marriages are “pointless and even oxymoronic” (Bennett, 2011, p.409). One does not need to fully agree with his assertions to acknowledge the intensity and goodness of his mind. Although Bennett’s stance constructs serious opposition and serves as a valuable argument, committing numerous logical fallacies in his text weaken his argument and made his overall reasoning less credible.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gay Marriage

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pollitt on her argument gives different points of view of why people object to same-sex marriage. One of the reasons is Religious. She mentions in her essay that “the objections to gay marriage are based on religious prejudice: The marriage of men and woman is “sacred”, and opening it to same-sexers violates its sacral nature”. (Page 572) What Pollitt is saying in this is that marriage is something pure, spiritual. It is a sign of true love between a man and woman. When people do it a different way it is like he or she is violating the nature of God creation. Another example that Pollitt has interest about gay marriage from the religious view is the Evangelical Religion (Protestants). This religion is against gay marriage and homosexuality as a choice. The Protestants explain that “gay marriage is wrong because it lets gays and lesbians avoid turning themselves into the straights God wants them to be”. (Page 572) From their view it is wrong because God created a man and woman to have children, and a family. This is not the only religion against gay marriage; the most famous one all around the world does not accept this. Some of the religions who are in favor to same-sex marriage include the Metropolitan Community church, which is an international protestant Christian denomination. This one is integrated for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender families and communities. Some others are Episcopalians, the United Church of Christ, the United Church of Canada, Quakers, and more. All of these religions approved the same-sex marriage and bless the union. Even though some people are…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just because gay culture is now shown on television, or there are now gay soldiers it does not answer the one question he asks which is “Why don’t gay people have their own individual rights to get married?” In providing fun pop culture facts he can relate to a younger more diverse audience but it does not change the fact that marriage is not legal. He also goes on in the essay saying that the gay culture is more common in this era and suggests more people are coming out at younger ages. This reference brings out a counter argument. What about all the areas in the United States and around the world where people cannot come out because it is not accepted where they live? It contradicts his whole argument that our country is going in the right moral direction of accepting gay relationships. Are we being racist or is being gay morally wrong? Sullivan leaves his essay open for a lot of counter arguments because his essay suggests that although gay marriage laws were passed in the state he lives in; but in forty-one other states gay couples still cannot wed. His reference at the end of his essay, suggests that it written in the time period gay marriage was legal in California. Same sex marriages were legal in California; 5 months later Prop 8 was passed and gay marriage was illegal again. At this point where same sex marriages are not legal in California anymore, the author comes off as arrogant and too confident in his thought of America changing its thoughts of homosexuality because it marriage is not possible for the gay community in California…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stoddard Essay

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Stoddard concludes his argument by saying that the gay community in America should “demand an end to this monstrous injustice,” (722). He ends boldly like this to drive home the point that the gay community deserves the right to be married and get the same benefits that a heterosexual couple receives. He also wants the readers to see that as longs a the two…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are many controversies surrounding today's world, such as abortion, animal testing, and social reform issues. It seems that no one can come to a common agreement on the legitimacy of these topics. Personal characteristics, such as upbringing, culture, religion and ethnicity, all play a role in determining one's feelings on a given controversial issue. However, one of the most protested and discussed issues in current political debate is same-sex marriage. There is no right or wrong answer to this question, only hard pressed arguments expressing speculation regarding supposed outcomes, benefits and possible tribulations that would come along with the endorsement of gay marriage. Such ideas are shown in pieces of writing by Manuel A. Lopez, in "The Case Against Gay Marriage" and by Scott Bidstrup in " Gay Marriage: The Arguments and Motives." These issues both discuss and contend common controversy surrounding the gay marriage debate. After reading and analyzing each essay, it is observed that Manuel A. Lopez' style of writing and literary tone give him the upper hand in establishing a more effective piece.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion to gay marriage they are all human and deserve equal rights. They deserve to be treated just like everyone no matter what gender. Just because religion institutions rule out gay marriage, the government should not deny homosexuals their rights, they all deserve to be happy. In the end gay marriage will not only be an advantage for the homosexuals but for many other people who can benefit from their…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Article Rebuttal

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When reading the article, I took every word as people that are in a same sex relationship can’t have a normal marriage or a normal family and normal life and that is why same sex marriage will ultimately fail. The only thing that is different about same sex marriage is that the genders of both people are the same. This doesn’t mean that the two people can’t have children, it just means they can‘t have them in the traditional way. Homosexuals that are married can have a normal life; they just might have to face other judgmental people, which they face even without being married.…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay Marriage

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ask just about anyone they’ll all say they’re in favor of equal rights for gays. Just name the topic- should gay people have the same rights in housing, jobs, should they have equal access to government benefits or equal protection under the law? Then you get to the topic of gay marriage- that’s when all the talk of equality stops dead cold. If two people love each other, no matter what their gender, ethnic back round, or religious values are, they should be able to get married. The law doesn’t discriminate against a white and black person getting married, or a Catholic and Jewish person, so why not two gay people. Unfortunately Proposition 8 passes-which now means that gay marriage in California is not recognized. Not allowing gay people to get married is like saying they have no rights, or they don’t matter. Gays should be able to marry because it’s their constitutional rights as human beings.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Most supporters of same-sex marriage contend that gay and lesbian couples should be treated no differently than their heterosexual counterparts and that they should be able to marry like anyone else" (Masci, par. 2). Gay marriage may conflict with some religions, but who's to say what people can believe in? Many people believe, or do not believe, in many different things and it is up to the homosexual and what he or she believes in to determine whether that person can get married or not. Gays shouldn't be treated differently, because they are regular people like everyone else in the world. Besides, denying gays of marriage "is a violation of religious freedom… [and] the First Amendment of the Constitution clearly states that a person's religious views or lack thereof must be protected" (Messerli, par. 2).…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gay Marriage

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages

    No one likes to be told what he or she can or cannot do. Parents do it to protect their children; bosses do it to direct people with their jobs. However, why are some people so focused and driven to control others they don't even know? People who oppose gay marriages fit into this category.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays