gbhkjnk

Asian Social Science; Vol. 9, No. 5; 2013
ISSN 1911-2017
E-ISSN 1911-2025
Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education

The Politics of Standard English: An Exploration of Thai Tertiary
English Learners’ Perceptions of the Notion of Standard English
Naratip Jindapitak1
1

Department of Languages and Linguistics, Faculty of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai
Campus, Thailand
Correspondence: Naratip Jindapitak, Department of Languages and Linguistics, Faculty of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai Campus, 90110, Thailand. E-mail: [e-mail]
Received: February 5, 2013 doi:10.5539/ass.v9n5p118 Accepted: March 7, 2013

Online Published: April 27, 2013

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n5p118

Abstract
Given that English becomes a lingua franca in the world in which more and more non-native speakers use it to suit their own purposes in local contexts, the ownership of English becomes denationalized. English as an international language scholars have maintained that English learners do not need to approximate the norms of native speakers as closely as possible. Hence, pedagogical attempts based on native-speaker linguistic standards become irrelevant in the contexts where English is mainly used as a lingua franca to serve such wider communicative purposes. In this study, I investigated how the notion of standard English was construed by the
Thai tertiary English majors. Focus group interview was used as a research tool to obtain participants’ critical perceptions. The results revealed that although the participants expressed that the notion of standard English was a complex issue that requires careful interpretation, deeply inside, it was still anchored to the ideology of native speaker or at least had to include the construct of native speaker in its working definition. Maintaining that the notion of standard English is a political construct rather than a linguistic reality, the

References: Acar, A. (2007). Standard and competence in English as an international language pedagogy. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 9(4), 39-53. Achebe, C. (1975). Morning yet in creation day. New York: Doubleday. Bezooijen, R. V. (2002). Aesthetic evaluation of Dutch: Comparison across dialects, accents and languages. In D. Boriboon, P. (2008). Cultural voices and representations in EFL materials design, pedagogy, and research. Boriboon, P. (2011). Language, ideology and domination: Problems of English language teaching in Thailand and solutions Buripakdi, A. (2012a). On professional writing: Thai writers ' views on their English. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22(2), 245-264 Buripakdi, A. (2012b). The marginalized positions of Thai professional writers on the global hegemony of English Canagarajah, A. S. (1999a). Interrogating the Native speaker fallacy: Non-linguistic roots, non-pedagogical results Canagarajah, A. S. (1999b). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press. Cook, V. (1999). Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 33(2), 185-209. Crystal, D. (2000). The future of Englishes. In A. Burns, & C. Coffin (Eds.), Analysing English in a global context: A reader (pp Crystal, D. (2001). Global Understanding for global English. Moscow State University Bulletin, 19(4), 13-28. Crystal, D. (2003). Final frontiers in applied linguistics. In S. Sarangi, & T. Van Leeuwen (Eds.), Applied linguistics and communities of practice (pp Erling, E. J., & Barlett, T. (2006). Making English their own: The use of ELF among students of English at the Free University of Berlin Giles, H., Bourhis, R., Trudgill, P., & Lewis, A. (1974). The imposed norm hypothesis: A validation. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 60, 405-410 Holliday, A. (2008). Standards of English and politics of inclusion. Language Teaching, 41(1), 119-130. Jaber, M., & Hussein, R. (2011). Native speakers’ perception of non-native English speech. English Language Teaching, 4(4), 77-87 Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Jenkins, J. (2006). Global intelligibility and local diversity: Possibility or paradox? In R. Rubdy, & M. Saraceni (Eds.), English in the world: Global rules, global roles (pp Jenkins, J. (2007). English as a lingua franca: Attitudes and identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Jenkins, J. (2011). Accommodating (to) ELF in international university. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 926-936. Jindapitak, N., & Teo, A. (2012). Thai Tertiary English Majors Attitudes Towards and Awareness of World Englishes Kachru, B. B. (1992). The other tongue: English across cultures (2nd ed.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press. Kirkpatrick, A. (2002). ASEAN and Asian culture models: Implications for the ELT curriculum and for teacher selection Kirkpatrick, A. (2007). World Englishes: Implications for international communication and English language teaching Kramsch, C. (1998). The privilege of the intercultural speaker. In M. Byram, & M. Fleming (Eds.), Language learning in intercultural perspective: Approaches through drama and ethnography (pp Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Kubota, R. (1998). Ideologies of English http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00105 Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Critical language pedagogy: A postmethod perspective on English language teaching Lippi-Green, R. (1997). English with an accent. London: Routledge. Matsuda, A. (2003). Incorporating world Englishes in teaching English as an international language. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 719-729 McKay, S. L. (2002). Teaching English as an international language: Rethinking goals and approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press. McKay, S. L. (2003). Toward an appropriate EIL pedagogy: Re-examining common ELT assumptions. Methitham, P. (2009). An exploration of culturally-based assumptions guiding ELT practice in Thailand, a non-colonized country Methitham, P. (2011). English as a modern-day Trojan horse: The political discourses of English language teaching Ministry of Education. (2008). The basic core curriculum B.E. 2551 (A.D. 2008). Bangkok: The Agricultural