Government Involvement In Drug Trade

1.Research United States government involvement in drug trade. Does government involvement affect or undermine the notion that government policies on drug control are in place to protect individuals from themselves, as the text states? Drug control is used to protect individuals. However, government involvement contradict the notion that the government wants to protect individuals from themselves. In the year of 1973 people with crack or heroin was required to spend life in prison. Mandatory sentences were created to help control drugs. It is believed that the United States make profits off of drug trade. “Within the United States, the profits to be made from the drug trade likewise guarantee a steady stream of drug dealers” (Peele, 1985,
“The predecessors to the modern Drug Enforcement Administration and other government and private organizations begin setting up education programs to stem the tide of abuse and addiction” (Goodmedicinebadbehavior.org). Laws were implemented to control substance abuse. During this era, the government was trying to control drug use. Therefore, the Durham Humphrey amendment had an impact on the amount of prescription medication could be found.
In the year of 1951 Durham-Humphrey law was passed. “The bill requires any drug that is habit-forming or potentially harmful to be dispensed under the supervision of a health practitioner as a prescription drug and must carry the statement, "Caution: Federal law prohibits dispensing without prescription” (FDA.gov). This amendment would help control prescription drug abuse. For example, there is a limit on purchasing over-the-counter medication. There are limits on certain over-the-counter medications, because people combines these medications to make
Treatment center can expect more clients with addictions. Legalizing illicit drugs can also cause health problems. Legalizing drugs will help the US save billions of dollars on treatment programs. Individuals will no longer be arrested for having drugs. “In a study for the Cato Institute, Jeffrey A. Miron, senior lecturer on economics at Harvard University and a senior fellow at Cato, and Katherine Waldock, professor of economics at New York University, estimate that legalizing drugs would save the government approximately $41.3 billion annually on expenditures related to the enforcement of prohibition”(IBT.com). Legalizing drugs will cause more problems. For instance, more people could be treated for overdosing on legalized