Preview

Gun Control. Does It Need Revised?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1682 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gun Control. Does It Need Revised?
Gun Control. Does it need revised?
Denise Kirby
March 20, 2013

Gun Control. Does it need revised? Gun control seems to be a major issue for discussion in our society today. These issues have stemmed from all the violence and tragedies that have happened in the past several years. There seems to be two sides of this argument. People are either for stricter gun control laws or against it. I would like to try to find the correct answer as I am a gun owner. I enjoy target shooting, skeet shooting, and hunting. So, gun control. Does it need to be revised? The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution states “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” There have been many debates as to what the original authors intended by the wording of this Amendment. Some people believe the phrase “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms” created individual constitutional rights for United States citizens. Some scholars argue that the phrase “a well regulated Militia” shows they meant only to restrict congress from taking away a states right to self-defense. In 1939 the United States Supreme Court adopted a collective rights approach in the case of United States v. Miller. They determined Congress could regulate a sawed-off shotgun which moved in interstate commerce under the National Firearms Act of 1934 because the evidence did not suggest it “has some reasonable relationship to the preservation of efficiency of a well regulated militia…” The Court further explained that the Second Amendment was to ensure the effectiveness of the military. In 2008 the United States Supreme Court considered this issue again in the case of District of Columbia v. Heller. After detailing the history and tradition of the Second Amendment, they proclaimed it established an individual right for United States citizens to possess firearms. They determined that the D.C.



References: The charters of freedom. Retrieved from Charters of Freedom website: http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html LaPierre, W. (2013, March 15). What they didn’t tell you today. Retrieved from the National Rifle Association website: http://www.home.nra.org Hanna, J. (2012, December 23). Kansas officials resist calls to rewrite gun laws. The Topeka Capital-Journal.[Topeka]. Retrieved from http://wwwchonline.com/news/2012-12-23/kansas-officials-resist-calls-rewrite-gun-laws Agresti, J & Smith, R. (2013, February 11). Just facts. Retrieved from website: http://www.justfacts.com/guncontrol.asp

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In March 2008 the second amendment was reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court in the District of Columbia et al v. Heller case. The court stated that the second amendment allowed people to own guns. They concluded that the District of Columbia’s ban on guns was unconstitutional. The ban made it a crime to have an unregistered gun. The ban also required lawful guns to be stored unloaded and unassembled or have a trigger lock on it. The second amendment has limits though. These bans violate the second amendment.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the last several years there has been an ongoing debate on how to interpret the Second Amendment and whether or not we should have gun control. With the Second Amendment specifically grants that "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." The controversy of it being that in the Second Amendment doesn't specify who "the people" are. This being said it leaves room for the legislative bodies and court to pass laws and interpretations that influence the way this Amendment is applied and enforced.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Supreme Court case District of Columbia v. Heller, the Court analyzed the meaning and extent of the Second Amendment for the first time since 1939. In narrow 5-4 decision penned by Justice that the District of Columbia’s ban on handgun was unconstitutional and thus violates the individual right granted by the Second Amendment. The Justices of the Supreme Court interpreted the Second Amendment as the right of individuals to keep and bear arms, having nothing to do with collective right grant by the service in a state militia. The Court made clear that this right to bear arms has limits, but, as explored in detailed below, the statue of limitations of those limitation remain unclear. D.C.…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment states, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” This amendment has caused many debates throughout the years due to the different ways in which it could be interpreted. Most federal appeals courts have said that, when read as a whole, this amendment protects only the rights of the militia to bear arms. However, on a decision made on March 8, 2007, the majority focused on the second clause, saying that the amendment protects the rights of individual people to own firearms as well. The decision was made in a federal appeals court in Washington to strike down a gun control law in the District of Columbia that made it impossible for residents to keep handguns in their homes. The court ruled that banning the right to own firearms was a violation of the Second Amendment.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is quite clear that by looking at criminals intentions and the overall protection of our country's people gun control should not be administered. Since the establishment of our great nation guns have played a central role and have been of great importance. Though some may think that guns are weapons of war, crime, and violence our Founding Fathers realized they were an essential right that needed to be preserved for the citizens. In the Bill of Rights the Second Amendment of the Constitution reads "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." Gun control proponents have…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the historical aspects of the government of United States, there has been one addition to the political aspect that is considered as one of the most controversial and debated; the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment was established on December 15, 1791 with nine other to the United States’ Constitution. It was proposed by James Madison soon after the Constitution was ratified in sought of more power to the state militias. (Brooks). This Amendment also served an important factor between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. It was a form of compromise between the two groups as to who should have more power. The Amendment states, “ A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution states; “A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” The Constitution was signed on September 17, 1787, and the Second Amendment has been highly debated ever since. (Second Amendment; Cornell University Law School, law.cornell.edu) Furthermore, America today doesn’t have luxury of interpreting what our forefathers where thinking at the time the Second Amendment was written. Americans feel called to rescue the Constitution from its original intent. For example; the government has formed an organized military, redefining “militia” from its original meaning, to what militia infers today, to most Americans…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment states that “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”. Early American colonies found themselves using firearms in battles such as the French and Indian War from 1754 to 1763, and eventually led to the development of the Second Amendment. The Bill of Rights was added to the United States Constitution, which included the Second Amendment, in 1791, and would essentially be the birth to one of the most well known controversial topics in American history (Gonzales 5-15).…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The court decided that militia does not limit the Second Amendment and that militia should not be limited to those who serve in the military. It protected an individual's right in more traditional lawful parts like using a firearm for self defense. This court case also helped declare Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975 as unconstitutional. (oyez.org) Later McDonald v Chicago also set a precedent in 2010 that extended to the states having more protection with gun rights. Both of these cases ruled in favor of protecting our gun rights. (Supreme Court)…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control laws should be revised. By definition, provided by the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, gun control is the regulation of the selling, owning, and use of guns. There has been many cases where guns have been in the wrong hands. These situations have occurred in schools (high school, grade school and even college), movie theaters, churches, and even U.S military bases. Is it the right to bear arms or is it the right to free murder? Nowadays, many people can go out and purchase a gun with their leisure. But not everyone is using it for self-defense. When there are mass murders, the weapon of choice is a gun and the outburst springs from anger, rage, and hate or to seek revenge. Their motives are not to protect themselves but kill others and endanger people. After many tragedies there is always light shined on the issue immediately after it happens, but is it ever fixed? Gun control laws are putting people at risk and are having many people fear for their lives and their loved one lives. They fear that they could be saying their last ‘goodbyes’ and ‘I love you’.…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control vs. Gun Rights

    • 1529 Words
    • 4 Pages

    From reading the Stencel book, I have learned for the first time that the Second Amendment was not just the right to bear arms. The Stencel book tells us that the Second Amendment really states: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to…

    • 1529 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Second Amendment Essay

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The argument that has lasted for centuries begins with the first part “A well regulated militia”. Over the years, many of the nation’s supreme courts have ruled in a lot of different ways. The definition of a well regulated militia means to provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Laws Are Bad

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Any society that will give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both ” (Benjamin Franklin). Gun control has been an issue for several years now due to the mass shootings and gun violence that has taken place. Many laws have been established to keep anymore shootings from happening, but these laws are starting to get out of hand. Adding and creating more gun control laws will not fix the problems with society today. Although some people could argue that gun control laws keep people safe, guns do not murder people, people murder people and no law could stop terrorist or criminals from causing mass shooting.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the United States’ Constitution, specifically the Second Amendment, states “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”. This statement gives the citizens the right to bear arms, because they as people can be a part of a “well regulated Militia”, that is imperative to the “security of a free state”. Does this statement still hold firm, or does it not? Personally, I believe that there should be a tight control on the sales and distribution of guns in the country, as they are a threat to human lives.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The controversy of guns and gun control has been around for decades, and people have been making laws on this topic since 1791. There are multiple positions you can take on this topic, and most of those positions have sufficient evidence and reasoning for why it's good. With all the laws/restrictions on guns today, it's clear guns must have some effect on our nation. The definition of gun control is "laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms". To summarize, gun control is the laws that let governemnt control the purchase and possesion of firearms. Due to multiple reasons, this idea has spawned much controversy. The first reason some people find it controversial is because they…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays