(AS PARTIAL REQUIREMENT OF THE COURSE)
WRITTEN CASE ANALYSIS ON SYLVIA GREGORIO’S CASE
Submitted by:
Jimmy Q. Arroyo Jr. and Walter P. Gonzalbo
MBA
I. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM The problem we have identified in the given case of Sylvia Gregorio was regarding the inefficiency of the employees of the Center for Energy Research and Development (CERD) Division of the Philippine Energy Company (PEC). Based on the given case where the complaints of both parties which included Sylvia Gregorio and the rest of the employees of CERD were briefed, we came up with some a list of problems which we decided to term as “Inefficiency” in general all through out the discussion of our analysis of Sylvia Gregorio’s case. The list consists of the following: 1. The employees in the CERD had tendencies of not taking their work seriously and seemed not to work hard unlike their PEC-Makati counterparts. 2. There are formations of cliques and exclusive groups which secluded and isolated certain groups of employees from each other. 3. The existence of disparity between salaries particularly the issue of unjust salary earned by every employee as well as the issue of confidentiality of the salary information. 4. There is dissatisfaction and inconsistency with the work particularly referring to the “No Promotion” status of several employees (specifically referring to Sylvia Gregorio) who became stagnant with their position in the company. 5. The Non-recognition of the abilities and skills of the various employees of the company which resulted in the discriminatory disadvantages of either male/female employee in a particular unit/section of the CERD division. 6. The misinterpreted allowable leave credits, frequent absenteeism and under time during office hours of the employees which is so much relevant to Sylvia Gregorio’s case. 7. The sleeping habits of employees during office hours and doing nothing on the job