Health Intervention Pros And Cons

This intervention/study was very effective in being precise in both its goals and findings. The intervention’s conclusions were informative and offered both tested proof and an exact method to remedy issues with the concern of the lack of education and action in regards to breast health in the intervention’s target population. An important aspect of health behavior that the intervention revealed was the finding that when two different groups are educated on a precise medical issue, it is significantly more likely the group that is given extra assistance in removing barriers will ultimately engage in the health behavior. This theory further demonstrates that cues to action and removal of barriers in addition to education have been shown to work
1. The intervention was effective in choosing a target population that desperately needed attention and would benefit greatly from a study that would allow the group to gain valuable insight into health education.
2. The intervention accurately created two distinct groups that would allow for the study to measure the impact level difference in providing health education solely, compared to providing health education and additional services in aiding the goal of the health education.
3. The intervention study created valuable insight into the importance of providing follow-up assistance following educational programs to at-risk groups, compared to the ineffective manner of solely providing educational programs and no follow-up support.
4. The findings gained from this study proving that cues to action and the removal of barriers significantly alter health behaviors, can be implemented in varying health service provider facilities (such as phone calls, assistance with reminders, appointment transportation