In “the right chemistry”, the author Anastasia Toufexis talks about love mostly in a scientific way. The different emotions and different chemicals that your body releases as you fall in and out of love. The old saying that "Love is like a Roller coaster” holds true. You are always full of emotions, which are driven by the chemicals your body excretes. It goes on to say that you get a sort of High, from being in love, and that sometimes you will find in life that a person can never be truly happy because they are continuously chasing that high. However, but how does one argue on the erratic thing we call “love?” No other word in history has meant so much. The word love is defined as “A deep, tender, ineffable feeling of affection and solicitude toward a person [place, pet, object, etc.] and a strong enthusiasm.” But most importantly, a person’s need to belong or to feel wanted is possibly the greatest motivation for the expression of love. In the essay “Love: The Right Chemistry,” Anastasia Toufexis analyzes and ultimately simplifies the concept of love as something that “rests firmly on the foundations of evolution, biology, and chemistry (205).” One could not agree more with her argument, but can love really be reduced and categorized as nothing more than cascading chemicals and the firing of neural synapses? Miss Toufexis’s argument is very strong, but science is too simple of an explanation for something as complex as romantic…