Here

The reason globalization has not worked is because there has not been enough of it. If countries, including the rich industrialized ones, got rid of all their protectionist measures, everyone would benefit from the resulting increase in international trade: it's simple economics. If unnecessary government regulation can be eliminated, and investors and cBut what about these so-called multilateral organisations like the IMF, World Bank and World Trade Organization? I don't remember electing them, so what gives them the right to say how countries run their own affairs? Isn't it obvious that these organisations only serve the interests of the US and to a lesser extent the other rich countries? Their only role is to peddle the neoliberal orthodoxy - the Washington consensus - that only impoverishes the poorest nations and maximizes the profits of multinationals.orporations can act freely, the result will be an overall increase in prosperity as the "invisible hand" of the market does its work. Yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah hahhhshshejshshshshsuhshshshshsh Is dineBut what about these so-called multilateral organisations like the IMF, World Bank and World Trade Organization? I don't remember electing them, so what gives them the right to say how countries run their own affairs? Isn't it obvious that these organisations only serve the interests of the US and to a lesser extent the other rich countries? Their only role is to peddle the neoliberal But what about these so-called multilateral organisations like the IMF, World Bank and World Trade Organization? I don't remember electing them, so what gives them the right to say how countries run their own affairs? Isn't it obvious that these organisations only serve the interests of the US and to a lesser extent the other rich countries? Their only role is to peddle the neoliberal orthodoxy - the Washington consensus - that only impoverishes the poorest nations and maximizes the profits of multinationals.orthodoxy - the Washington