Legal marriage is a matter of essential universal and equal rights. Despite all, fairness and dignity of gay couples should be respected. Here are some ethical and social arguments for the legislation of gay marriage that would benefit us all. Studies have constantly revealed that married people tend to be better off financially, emotionally, psychologically and even medically. Moreover, psychologically, the feature of marriage establishes official and public relationships that make it easier for people to support each other, giving them the capability and skill to grow stronger. The support can be on different levels, especially in hard situations like medical issues. The chosen life partner would be able to take things in charge. Moreover, we all know that gay couples adopt babies. When it would come to adopting and raising the children, they would be living in a steady married household making them feel like any other of their classmates. In addition allowing same sex marriage would assist to a better integration of their relationships into society. Therefore, if two people are committed and are able to create a suitable union and provide love and care for their families then why not let them marry? It would do good to the stability and consistency of our society in…
"The Secular Case Against Gay Marriage." The Tech (M.I.T.) February 20th, 2004: "Homosexual relationships do nothing to serve the state interest of propagating society, so there is no reason to grant them the costly benefits of marriage. [...] When a state recognizes a marriage, it bestows upon the couple certain benefits which are costly to both the state and other individuals. Collecting a deceased spouse's social security, claiming an extra tax exemption for a spouse, and having the right to be covered under a spouse's health insurance policy are just a few examples of the costly benefits associated with marriage. In a sense, a married couple receives a subsidy. Why? Because a marriage between to unrelated heterosexuals is likely to result in a family with children, and propagation of society is a compelling state interest. For this reason, states have, in varying degrees, restricted from marriage couples unlikely to produce…
The first reason why same sex marriage should be legal is because it is fair for all individuals to have the same rights in society. With the end of sodomy laws, a recent decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, conservatives have lost their last excuse to write off gay lives and love as unworthy of social accommodation. But whatever ones feel about the reasoning of the decision, its results is clear: gay Americans are no longer criminals. Even if they were, as murderers on death row that have the constitutional right to marriage, they should have too. Marriage is a very sacred arrangement. It is a lifetime commitment said to be only between man and woman. These two people should love or be in love with each other. Over the years homosexuality has come to the forefront. The question of should homosexuals be allowed to marry each other has had the world in an uproar. Homosexuals, indeed should be able to marry each other with the same benefits as man and woman. Homosexual marriages was made legal for the first time in 2001 by the Netherlands. Canada was the first country to marry Homosexual couples from all nations to formally commit. Extending recognition to non traditional relationships is not an attempt to undermine the family. But rather an effort to recognize today’s realities and to end decimation.…
Even though in the U.S. Constitution it does not specify anything about marriage whether it is homosexual or heterosexual, the constitution was designed to ensure that a federal government was established and to ensure equal rights to all citizens of the nation. In 1996 the Federal Defense of Marriage Act prevented any states from legalizing gay marriage however that was proven to be unconstitutional because it restricts the states to define marriage and prohibits gay couples the same rights and benefits as heterosexual couples. (Lavoie, 2012 Gay Marriage Law…) This all boils down to one underlying statement that many gay rights activist are battling for every day and that is that denying homosexuals the equal right to marry just as their heterosexual counterpart has the right to marry his or her significant other, is unconstitutional discrimination and that by prohibiting such an act to a certain group of people is not only in…
Due to their beliefs, religious faiths are free to discriminate against same-sex marriage but the government should not be able to. Two people should be able to enter into marriage without the government intervening. According to the first amendment, the Bible has no say in American law, causing the church to be separated from the states decisions. Making same-sex marriage illegal is similar to criminalizing a white person for marrying a black person or an American’s right to marry a non-American. An American should have the right to marry whomever they desire, no matter their race, religion, nationality, or gender. Gays have been fighting for their rights for over 60 years, and…
Whether an individual is against gay marriage or for it, we all have an opinion on the issue. Andrew Sullivan’s describes how marriage as a basic need for individuals no matter their sexual orientation. However, William Bennett believes that “same- sex marriage would do significant, long term social damage” (1138). Whether we like it or not gay marriage influences marriage institution, culture, and their children.…
The New York Times’ article about the Supreme Court taking up the same-sex marriage issue was clear and accurate. There were good statistics about states’ involvements in the on-going debate. There were hyper-links to other topics related to this article such as Social Security benefits, estate taxes, Proposition 8, and domestic partnerships in specific states. The facts that were reported in this New York Times’ article were specific and detailed enough to gather the message of the topic being presented. Other facts that support the topic, although not detailed in this report, allow for readers to research further at their own will, using the provided links.…
Everybody should have the right to a legally recognized union with a partner of their choice. The debate over whether or not people in same sex relationship should be allowed to marry, or even enter into civil unions is no new fight. Legalizing gay marriage has brought a new trend which then providing the arguments on supporting gay marriage such as denying them is a violation of religious freedom and minority discrimination encourages people to have strong family values and constitute a good based family as well as giving up high-risk sexual lifestyles. Homosexuality is an accepted lifestyle nowadays with most evidence proving biological causation, and marriage benefits should be available to all couples.…
Just recently our nation has taken initiative into changing the gay rights that our nation lacks by repealing the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell policy that was established in 1993 by our former president Clinton. In the United States there are only five states, not including District of Columbia, that have legalized same sex marriage. Lawmakers ignore the fact that legalizing gay marriage has economical benefits. If the state of New York were to make gay marriage legal, it will result in a positive net impression on the state’s budget as it did for Vermont according to the article ‘The Economic Impact of Extending Marriage to Same-Sex Couples in Vermont” by Christopher Ramos, M.V. Lee Badgett, and Brad Sears of the William Institute. Specifically for New York, according to The New York Times article, “Would Gay Marriage Help the State Economy?” By Jeremy W. Peters, the state’s economy would gain $210 million over three years.…
In the United States, there is social unrest regarding the government’s denial of the right to marry for homosexuals. Plenty of conservatives are completely against gay marriage; and many of liberals are fighting for equal treatment. The neo-Christian politicians are using religious arguments to establish that homosexuality is an abomination. Clearly we as a nation are undecided on this issue. 36 states have passed legislation banning gay marriages, yet the state of Vermont passed a law that allows homosexual couples the right to participate in civil unions. Some other states are also debating whether or not to allow these couples to marry. Unfortunately, the dispute has left the United States homosexual community in an awkward position. Gays who gain the same benefits from marriage would be a more productive part of society for two reasons: the benefits from marriage and the pursuit of happiness obtained from the right of gay marriage. Many gays disagree with the argument that marriage is a tradition. They believe we should not discriminate who may be married. It is clear where gays stand. They do not want to settle for less than marriage status.…
“As of May 10, 2012, gay marriage has been legalized in eight US states and the District of Columbia” (National Conference). According to the constitution, each person has the right to liberty and equality, meaning that the rights of marriage should be granted to everyone regardless of sex. “The US Supreme Court declared in 1974’s Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur that the ‘freedom of personal choice in matters of marriage and family life is one of the liberties protected by the Due Process Clause’” (ProCon.org). Those who are pro-gay marriage also argue that the gained revenue brought in from marriage licenses, and higher income taxes of those marriages, would be good for local and state governments. “The Comptroller for New York City found that legalizing gay marriage would bring $142 million to the City’s economy and $184 million to the State’s economy over three years” (ProCon.org).…
There are both advantages and disadvantages to the health effects of gay marriage on the couple themselves and their children. In favor of gay marriage, research shows that gay marriage has a positive effect on the health of the gay population. The legalization of gay marriage in Massachusetts proved to reduce health-care risks for homosexual males. According to the American Journal of Public Health, there were “reductions in several medical and mental health diagnoses that are associated with stress — including hypertension, depression, and adjustment disorders” (Kliff par. 4) They also found a 13% decrease in health related visits to the hospital. (Kliff par. 2).…
Gay marriage has been the cause of intense debate in the United States for years. Sexual activity within the same gender was something that was considered normal in Greek and Roman times but in today’s society, there is a great amount of controversy concerning sexual activity between homosexuals and same-sex marriage. A couple of reasons why gay marriage has become so controversial is because of religion, the issue of procreation, and the concern for children who are raised in same sex house-holds. Although there are a great deal of people who find gay marriage to be considered a negative idea, there is also a significant amount of people who are for gay marriage and would like gay marriage to be legal in the United States. According to The Associated Press 3/27/13, a “Pew Research Center poll” that took place in March shows that the number of people in America who approve gay marriage are up to forty-nine percent and there is forty-four percent of people who do not approve (par.6). These percentages show that both sides of opinion come close in number and when there is a great amount of differences in opinion on one given subject, conflict will certainly arise.…
Same sex marriage is something that people have been fighting for rights for many decades. Andrew Koppelman (2004), celebrated journalist and author, states that “Most Americans agree with the first sentence of the proposed amendment: "Marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman." The main question this raises is whether this rule is important enough to enshrine in the Constitution” (p.4). Many Americans can agree that the first sentence of the amendment is broad and that it invalidates domestic partnership laws that allow same sex couples the rights of marriage without the name (Koppelman, 2004).…
Every people has same right to chose their spouse. The US Supreme Court ruled in 1974’s Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur that the "freedom of personal choice in matters of marriage and family life is one of the liberties protected by the Due Process Clause.” US District Judge Vaughn Walker wrote on Aug. 4, 2010 that Prop. 8 in California banning gay marriage was "unconstitutional under both the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses."…