defend their country. If a high school athlete has the talent and the marketplace is demanding his or her talent, why should he not be allowed to enter the NBA? The same marketplace that would give these players these contracts are the same marketplaces that would tear up the same contracts if these players were to get hurt in college. It should be the player's choice if he or she wants to go to college or straight to the NBA. Now the NBA league officials increased the age limit to 19 years old so that the potential players could see how it is to live with responsibilities before entering the NBA. The players would have an opportunity to explore possible careers while attending college. In the 2003 NBA season, Lebron James was the number one draft pick at the age of eighteen. A lot of basketball critics held him in high regard even before he was drafted. For the first few seasons in his NBA career, James averaged 20 points a game and 6 assists. The team chose James as their team leader. His maturity and unselfishness was showcased on and off the court. So the NBA should not deny other athletes like James the chance to live their dreams. Many other sports such as baseball, hockey and tennis have employed teenagers and allowed them to compete in professional tournaments. In the 2003 Major League Baseball Draft, 8 of the top 20 picks came from high school or home schooling. Tennis player Martina Hingis won her first WTA tournament at age 14. Many high school athletes in other sports have the opportunity to compete at the pro level and earn a pro salary. Why exclude basketball players? Why should a high school player go to college and have the university make money off of him when he can go to the NBA and make millions of his own? In conclusion, high school basketball players should decide whether they want to go to college. While others may have the best intentions for these athletes, it should ultimately be the player's decision if they are ready to play NBA basketball and live life on their own.
defend their country. If a high school athlete has the talent and the marketplace is demanding his or her talent, why should he not be allowed to enter the NBA? The same marketplace that would give these players these contracts are the same marketplaces that would tear up the same contracts if these players were to get hurt in college. It should be the player's choice if he or she wants to go to college or straight to the NBA. Now the NBA league officials increased the age limit to 19 years old so that the potential players could see how it is to live with responsibilities before entering the NBA. The players would have an opportunity to explore possible careers while attending college. In the 2003 NBA season, Lebron James was the number one draft pick at the age of eighteen. A lot of basketball critics held him in high regard even before he was drafted. For the first few seasons in his NBA career, James averaged 20 points a game and 6 assists. The team chose James as their team leader. His maturity and unselfishness was showcased on and off the court. So the NBA should not deny other athletes like James the chance to live their dreams. Many other sports such as baseball, hockey and tennis have employed teenagers and allowed them to compete in professional tournaments. In the 2003 Major League Baseball Draft, 8 of the top 20 picks came from high school or home schooling. Tennis player Martina Hingis won her first WTA tournament at age 14. Many high school athletes in other sports have the opportunity to compete at the pro level and earn a pro salary. Why exclude basketball players? Why should a high school player go to college and have the university make money off of him when he can go to the NBA and make millions of his own? In conclusion, high school basketball players should decide whether they want to go to college. While others may have the best intentions for these athletes, it should ultimately be the player's decision if they are ready to play NBA basketball and live life on their own.