The case in point is Plessy v. Ferguson, in which Jim Crow Laws were challenged. Homer Plessy, a man who was one-eighth black, negated the norms of segregation by refusing to sit on the section of a train reserved for color people only. He was arrested as a result, convicted, and fined for disobeying the law. This case went to the Supreme Court where it was ruled by a judge under the legal basis that segregation was reasonable as long as provisions are provided for all of the races involved. In turn, the “separate but equal principle” came to be, in which an agreement was made that as long as the provisions are provided for African Americans, segregation cannot be questioned. The injustice from these significant events in the history civil and
The case in point is Plessy v. Ferguson, in which Jim Crow Laws were challenged. Homer Plessy, a man who was one-eighth black, negated the norms of segregation by refusing to sit on the section of a train reserved for color people only. He was arrested as a result, convicted, and fined for disobeying the law. This case went to the Supreme Court where it was ruled by a judge under the legal basis that segregation was reasonable as long as provisions are provided for all of the races involved. In turn, the “separate but equal principle” came to be, in which an agreement was made that as long as the provisions are provided for African Americans, segregation cannot be questioned. The injustice from these significant events in the history civil and