Britain at the time. This was just one of a few examples of rule without representation. This making of rules without the representation for the colonies is what the colonists were trying to stop. Tyranny is considered rule that is oppressive. The way that King George implemented the proclamation line without the colonists being properly represented was considered tyrannical by these same colonists. King George III took charge of Britain in 1760 during the French Indian war. King George III taking over worried the colonists. He took over during the French Indian war which cost Britain a lot of money which they had to collect payment from somewhere. King George implemented taxes on the colonies. These taxes were not a major problem however the implementation of these taxes were. King George by definition was considered a tyrannical ruler and handed down many rulings over the colonies. The colonies eventually started to get fed up with the King ruling over the Colonies without them being properly represented. The colonies had representation in parliament but it was not what they wanted. King George would not allow the colonies to have proper representation and this angered the colonists. Taxation without representation was the biggest threat to colonial prosperity. Colonists wanted representation in Parliament and when these new taxes from King George were implemented it angered the colonists. These taxes led to the Boston Tea Party which costed Britain a lot of money. The colonists ultimately wanted representation but what they got instead was rule by a tyrannical leader. The colonies decided that the only way to get the representation they wanted was to declare independence. In conclusion King George, taxation without representation, and the proclamation line were all major reasons for the colonists to declare independence. These colonists were tired of the tyranny put in place by King George which helped push the independence narrative. Which ultimately led to the Declaration of Independence in 1776.
Britain at the time. This was just one of a few examples of rule without representation. This making of rules without the representation for the colonies is what the colonists were trying to stop. Tyranny is considered rule that is oppressive. The way that King George implemented the proclamation line without the colonists being properly represented was considered tyrannical by these same colonists. King George III took charge of Britain in 1760 during the French Indian war. King George III taking over worried the colonists. He took over during the French Indian war which cost Britain a lot of money which they had to collect payment from somewhere. King George implemented taxes on the colonies. These taxes were not a major problem however the implementation of these taxes were. King George by definition was considered a tyrannical ruler and handed down many rulings over the colonies. The colonies eventually started to get fed up with the King ruling over the Colonies without them being properly represented. The colonies had representation in parliament but it was not what they wanted. King George would not allow the colonies to have proper representation and this angered the colonists. Taxation without representation was the biggest threat to colonial prosperity. Colonists wanted representation in Parliament and when these new taxes from King George were implemented it angered the colonists. These taxes led to the Boston Tea Party which costed Britain a lot of money. The colonists ultimately wanted representation but what they got instead was rule by a tyrannical leader. The colonies decided that the only way to get the representation they wanted was to declare independence. In conclusion King George, taxation without representation, and the proclamation line were all major reasons for the colonists to declare independence. These colonists were tired of the tyranny put in place by King George which helped push the independence narrative. Which ultimately led to the Declaration of Independence in 1776.