How Did The Government Of Rome And Carthage Differ

In my discussion, the Governments of Rome and Carthage did differ in such a way that their societies were governed by two very different models. In considering The Roman Republic, I noted that it was formed by representatives. And the whole idea was borrowed from the Greeks as they were experimenting on democracy. In considering, Carthage, I noted that the best description of Carthage was an Oligarchy that related more on trade or commerce. When You consider its structure, one could find it to be more comparable to that of the Italian City-states which went through renaissance.

The military might of Rome and Carthage had many differences as well. In considering the Roman Republic, I noted that Rome was largely considered to have a military that was based on land. In addition, the Roman army was largely comprised of volunteers who were citizens that were trained to fight in a well integrated manner. This was the state of affairs before the Punic Wars begun. In considering Carthage, I noted that despite the fact that Carthage was a mercantile power, it was necessary for it to have a navy that was powerful. However, the ships were considered the standard of the world during that time. The military System of Carthage was indeed well balanced in as far as its navy was concerned. For its navy was considered the greatest at that time. In addition, the army of Carthage was considered to comprise mostly of mercenaries. And owing to the fact that Carthage was a commercial empire, it was able to draw Its troops from across the Mediterranean.
It is a well known fact that the Romans did worship the Latinized versions of the Greek gods while the Carthaginians did worship Phoenician gods, with origins in the Middle