Preview

How Does Jim Crow Laws Affect Society

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
529 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Does Jim Crow Laws Affect Society
Peaceful resistance to law positively impacts society. Humans have a lengthy, detailed history of not always being able to see what is right or moral in certain circumstances, and unfortunately, humans are who create laws. One infamous example of unjust laws would be the Jim Crow laws of the south. Today, it is clear as day that discrimination and racism is unconstitutional, but why was it so hard to see that during that time period.

There is a certain hindsight people gain after going through an experience or a time, and it causes them to wonder why they did what did and how they did not see what they were doing was wrong. History is all about learning from previous mistakes, and history has showed us that civil disobedience is a powerful way to stand up for something that is not right.

There is a connection between the type of people who engage in peaceful protest and the laws they are fighting for or against. That is, people who recognize them that violence is not the answer and who go about change in a civilized manner have a 6th sense. That sense being hindsight. They are able to recognize that an unjust law is no law at all (King Jr.). If the civil, conscience people of America calls a law into question,
…show more content…

By choosing to to stay peaceful even when they were being verbally and physically assaulted, told a lot about the character of each of those men and women fighting for their freedom. It says, I am done fighting for something that should not have to be fought for, for it is my constitutional right to be considered equal in everything the world has to offer me as an individual of African American decent. It says, I am a civilized, loving, patient human being just like every other American citizen no matter the color of their skin. The Civil Rights Movement showed America that African Americans have just as much character as any other human

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Civil disobedience can turn into civil disturbance. When a white truck driver, Reginald Denny, was dragged from his vehicle and severely beaten by an angry mob. Both Martin Luther King Jr. and Thoreau believed that one should act out against an unjust law by means of peaceful protest. Therefore both King and Thoreau would not support the rebels' violent behavior of the LA riots. If one is going to openly express his ideas of disagreeing with an unjust law, he must be willing to accept the consequences. Both Martin Luther King Jr. and Thoreau demonstrated this acceptance…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The term civil rights refers to the non-political and personal liberties of a citizen. Civil rights are there to protect individual freedoms from the government, an organization or a personal individual. Civil rights insures people with physical virtue, life and safety. It gives protection from discrimination on grounds such as race, gender and color. Throughout the years in America’s history many groups have gone through discrimination.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The assumption of ‘White Guilt” and the privileges of “Whiteness” have helped me more in focusing my attention to the theatrics of the “Tea Party”. It has made me more aware of the fear attached to new laws implicated in many states which are considered “ Red “or Republican states run from Governorship to federal appointed senators and Congressional representatives. Their fears of the changing racial demographics of the country to more minority majority has fostered voting laws more reminisced to the ages of the southern “Jim Crow Laws”. Jim Crow laws prevented Blacks and minorities from voting due to “poll taxes, literacy test, vouchers of good character, and disqualification for “crime of moral turpitude”. (The United States Department of Justice, 2013) Today many states have in acted laws reminiscent to the past, over “felony convictions restrict 13% of the country’s black male population from voting” nonviolent offenses brand someone a felon”, “prompting critics to portray felon disenfranchisement as heir to the voter-suppression tactics of the Jim Crow era.” (Knafo, 07/2) “Thirty four states have in acted strict voter ID Laws “that affect minorities as well as the poor, college students and the elderly who, most likely…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    30 years after slavery had ended, African Americans had lived a harsh life. Many looked for a way out of the South. They began to migrate to the west and north in the 1890’s. This was known as The Great Migration.…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States, in simple terms, was built upon a group of people who wanted change. These people knew that if they did not act, then they would not receive the change that was needed. When asked if peaceful resistance to laws positively or negatively impact a free society we must look at the past for an answer. And as the United States of America our history shows that peaceful protest positively impacts a free society. In the years of 1954-1968 African-Americans peacefully fought for the end of segregation and various forms of oppression, including race-inspired violence. Laws barred them from classrooms, bathrooms, theaters, and train cars that were used by "whites." Leaders such as Martin Luther King Jr. peacefully fought for freedom by speaking out to the public that all…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debate was thrust into a hotbed of discussion during the peak of the Civil Rights Movement in the United States. In 1964, Morris I. Leibman was an avid anti-civil disobedience activist. He argued that there is no reason for any citizen to find an excuse to break the law because when people agree to enter society, they accept the rules that society establishes. Once you break these laws, there is no purpose to society existing in the first place. He argues that if you give leeway to certain circumstances in the law, where do you draw the line? In his mind, civil disobedience is deplorable and believes it’s the wrong way to create change. Continuing with this train of thought, Herbert Storing argued that civil disobedience would likely die out because of its irrelevance to today’s problems. He found it’s attempt to combine revolution and conventional political action into one as a blend of ideas ineffective in its approach for change. Both of these men wrote their responses to civil disobedience at the height of the Civil Rights Movement in the U.S. and both agreed that black people deserved equal opportunity under the law, but they felt that civil disobedience was a regressive tactic…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jim Crow laws had an immense impact on Americans in their daily lives. Many times African Americans would be separated from white people on common tasks such as doing their laundry, waiting in waiting rooms, even drinking water. This is obvious due to all of the times whites and African Americans were separated from other humans in all of those simple tasks and more. The white people were basically disgusted by the African Americans, afraid to drink the same water, or even eat in the same general area.…

    • 88 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil disobedience is astute to violating the American laws. Thus is deterred incorrect. Peaceful resistance positively impacts a free society. Peaceful resistance is profound ed through: protest and The U.S Constitution. Therefore, these concepts and their significant impacts; allows civil disobedience to be in act to a free society.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Robert Goldwin in “The Case Against Civil Disobedience”, argues that civil disobedience is ultimately ineffectual, that it is impossible to change a system from within. It is true that peaceful resistance to laws is ultimately not concerned with radically changing the system, but protesting laws that are at discord with the principles of the…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a free society, it is necessary for people to have an outlet to complain about laws. However, if a law is written in a way such that it would be illegal to protest it, in those times, breaking the law might be the only option. For example, during the 1960s, civil rights leaders had to break the law to get attention from the media and rally for change to show how wrong segregation was. Breaking the law peacefully positively affects a free society if the laws restrict the freedom of the country.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, in 2013, Edward Snowden released 1.5 million classified NSA documents on the Internet. In doing so, he jeopardized the lives and safety of our U.S. service members abroad and at home; actions that would be considered by most to be an aggressive act toward this country, and a violation of the law. Other prominent examples of resistances-gone-wrong are the riots sparked by the infamous Black Lives Matter Group. Fox News reported that while protesting, they threw rocks through windows, beat bystanders bloody, burned vehicles, and fought violently with police officers. These too were unlawful and aggressive acts of disobedience. But despite these recent episodes, not all instances of civil disobedience have been violent and unruly. During the 1960’s, according to ushistory.org, African-Americans staged sit-ins at local diners where the law said that they were not allowed to sit. Perfectly peaceful, they refused to get up, and in doing so violated the law of that time. Other protesters staged bus boycotts, in which they sat anywhere on the bus they chose, in response to laws that restricted bus seating for African-Americans. Despite the fact that these acts were illegal at the time, the protests were done peacefully. No one was beaten, nor any vehicles or buildings burned down in these specific…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the 1800’s, civil disobedience has been used by the people to peacefully oppose laws and fight the government. Civil disobedience—when used in it’s true form (which is to be peaceful and willingly accept punishment after purposely breaking a law)—does not create violence or undermine the government. Instead, it brings negative light to the law itself and allows the government and the people to evaluate it and make their own decisions upon whether or not they agree with the civil disobedient who opposed it. In his article “The Morality of Disobedience”, Morris Keeton states that “We should enlarge the role of civil disobedience and enhance its effectiveness for constructive change” (507). Overall, civil disobedience positively effects…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Without civil disobedience our country could not have evolved and changed as much as it has throughout the decades. Civil Disobedience is the act of protesting and defying the law or government peacefully while accepting the consequences of such actions. Civil Disobedience has gotten numerous marginalized groups of people the ability to have rights and abilities that before their act of defiance, they didn’t have before. Protests by women, African Americans, Latinos, and many others have gotten them the right to vote, to go to school where they pleased, and to be treated fairly throughout society. Civil Disobedience positively affects a free society because it proves the society is truly free. If Civil Disobedience was not…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So, what allowed this movement to have a positive impact on free society? The answer to this question is found in Martin Luther King Jr.’s Letter from Birmingham Jail. In his letter, Luther states, “In any nonviolent campaign there are four basic steps: (1) Collection of the facts to determine whether injustices are alive. (2) Negotiation. (3) Self-purification and (4) Direct Action.” These steps give us a blueprint for why the Civil Rights Movements’ acts of civil disobedience positively affected our society. So many of our modern attempts at civil disobedience fail because they ignore these key steps, and in doing so undermine their cause. Another key difference is the goal of the direct action. Today, direct action is an attempt to show disagreement, rather than a plan to promote debate and free speech. Luther also states, “We who engage in nonviolent direct action are not the creators of tension. We merely bring to the surface the hidden tension that is already alive. We bring it out in the open where it can be seen and dealt with like a boil… injustices must likewise be exposed to the light of human conscience and the air of national opinion before it can be cured.” Essentially, for any resistance to the law to succeed, it must ensure that the goal is to promote a scholarly debate over the issues to spark…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As a citizen of the Untied Staes of America i believe that peacefully disobeying a law is much better than casung chaos.For example Rosa Parks was disobeyinga law peacefully, even though she was supposed to give up her seat because a caucasion person seemed to have more rights back in 1955 . By disobeying this law she was the first step to equality for all races. She helped people in society realize that it doesn't matter what race you are or even how smart you are . Everyone deserves to be treated the same , no one is worth any less than the next person. Many people stand with this question " Is it right to break the law ? " In some cases yes , only if it's something worth fighting for . I would have done the exact same thing Rosa Parks had done because why should that…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays