Preview

How Does Mary Anne Warren Outweigh The Right To Life

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
731 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Does Mary Anne Warren Outweigh The Right To Life
The right to an individual’s life will always outweigh that of another’s. If in all circumstances the right to your life comes before anyone else’s life, then abortion is justifiable. Overall we have the ultimate control of our bodies and the consent to what we allow to happen or not happen.

Mary Anne Warren argues that no matter the situation, the woman always has the utmost authority in the sense of her life and body. The assertion: “But even if a potential person does have a prima facie right to life, such a right could not possibly outweigh the right of a woman to obtain an abortion, since the rights of any actual person invariably outweigh those of any potential person, whenever the two conflict,” is very significant. Here, Warren claims
…show more content…
Her analogy is about an explorer who falls into the hands of aliens that are going to make a few hundred thousand clones of him unless he can escape. The clones would have roughly the same genetic code and be potential human beings. Warren states, “[T]o deprive all of these potential people of their potential lives; for his right to life outweighs all of theirs together, in spite of the fact that they are all genetically human, all innocent, and all have a very high probability of becoming people very soon…” (Warren, p. 489). She reasons that he has the right to deny the potential beings life because his own life is significantly worthy. Our own lives exceed the viability of all others, as so does theirs to ours. Warren says, “Regardless of how he got captured, he is not morally obligated to remain in captivity for any period of time for the sake of permitting any number of potential people to come into actuality, so great is the margin by which one actual person’s right to liberty outweighs whatever right to life even a hundred thousand potential people have” (Warren, p. 490). Altogether, even if the circumstances in no way harms or affects a person, they have sole authority to determine what occurs in their …show more content…
Constitutionally, we as actual human beings have the right to our own lives. In the article “On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion” Warren states, “[I]n the absence of any overwhelming social need for every possible child, the laws which restrict the right to obtain an abortion, or limit the period of pregnancy during which an abortion may be performed, are a wholly unjustified violation of a woman’s most basic moral and constitutional rights” (Warren, p.490). With this being said, if women are dismissed form having the power to make decisions concerning their lives then they are being refused of their moral and even constitutional rights. Having freedom means having the power to act, think, speak as we want without limits. As American’s we are granted these rights. Therefore, as actual human beings we have rights to protect our won interest and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In "The Ways We Lie" by Stephanie Ericsson, Ericsson talks about how lies exist in aspects of our life every single day. She describes the different ways that humans lie and justifies why people doing so. These lies discussed in this article include the white lies, facade lies, lies of omission and lies that focus around stereotypes. White lie is a common way that people lie to others, because the lie would be better than the truth. Sometimes, the truth will cause more damage or dangerous than a simple harmless…

    • 91 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mary Anne Warren Thesis

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Warrens view on pro-life is incorrect because although the fetuses aren’t capable of consciousness, reasoning, self-motivation, communication or self-awareness; the fetus is still a human. Although a fetus is not able to think for itself, that does not mean that it won’t have the five traits Warren was examining. By terminating a fetus, you are restraining a human from a life, where he or she will be able to reason, and prove consciousness, etc. It is unfair to say that a fetus is not a person, the unborn child has a genetic code, making him or she unique and the potential to be its own individual. There is potential for this fetus to mature and it is unfair to restrain it because it hasn’t reached its full level of…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Warren states that there is no limitation to abortion and it is always justifiable. A fetus or infant are not considered persons. To Warren it is wrong to kill an innocent human being but a fetus is not a human being, so therefore, it is not wrong to kill a fetus. A fetus or infant has not reached personhood due to the five traits which Warren describes makes a person. The traits that make a person, according to Warren are: consciousness, reasoning, self-motivated activity,…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people believe that abortions should be legal because women should have the right to choose whether or not they want to bring a baby into the world. They believe a woman should have property rights which include the body and the fetus. They also believe a woman should have privacy rights which means the state should not interfere with private matters. These people are called pro choice. At the same time many people are anti-abortion because they believe “Life is present from the moment of conception” (526). In Don Marquis’s essay, “Why Abortion is Immoral” he takes the position that abortion is “morally unjustified” (525). The purpose of the essay is to go against the belief that “The anti-abortion position is either a symptom of irrational religious dogma or a conclusion generated by seriously confused philosophical argument” (525). Abortions should be illegal because they are morally wrong except, in cases beyond our control.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The debate on abortion is one that still to this day has been constantly argued. This argument can be historically dated back to 1973, where a popular case was brought into the Supreme Court. This was the Roe V Wade case, which legalized abortions in “abortion in earlier months of pregnancy without restrictions and with restrictions in later months” (Lewis). Jane Roe was the alias for Norma McCorvery. She was the one arguing that in Texas there should be abortions allowed due to the protection of her rights as well as many other women that she was speaking for. The argument of abortion, however, works well beyond just the “rights” of the women wanting it. There is death involved as well as responsibilities that apparently many women aren’t ready for. However there are certain circumstances in which the pregnancy might not have been exactly planned or the child wouldn’t be safe in the living conditions of its parents. In this case, abortion should still not be looked at instead adoption should be thought about. The Roe V Wade case should be reconsidered to only have an abortion done if it was absolutely vital to the person asking for it.…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ultimately, she argues that the fetus are not human beings therefore, we should not worry about if we should be able to kill them. She states that the fetus is genetically human, but she claims that research has shown that a fetus is not morally a human. Genetically human is known as a member of the homo sapiens species and being morally human can be summed up by saying one that gives us traits that make us have moral rights. She compiles a list of attributes that make a human morally human: consciousness, reason, self-motivated activity, communication, and self-awareness (not necessarily all of them). She concludes that because the fetus is not morally a human until around the third trimester, so the fetus is not a human until that point, which makes an abortion acceptable any time before the third trimester, or around twenty or so weeks. However, she doesn’t agree with allowing the individual to have an abortion done after reaching the state where the fetus is morally…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The ability of a woman to have control of her body is critical to civil rights” (Linda, 10 Arguments: for and Agents Abortion). To have control of your own body is critical to rights under the U.S. constitution, to not have the ability to do what you want to your body. If someone else controls one thing of your body, they are violating your rights, even carrying something like a child, if you don’t want it attached to your body they are violating your rights, even when carrying something like a child, if you don’t want it attached to your body you should have it removed.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    She gives the example that the mother is trapped in a tiny house with a large baby that is already pushing her against the walls and soon will crush her to death. This argument is not consistent with a case of abortion in that it placed the baby outside of the fetus and the baby being oversized. The mother would also have other places in the house to go to possibly avoid getting crushed by the enlarged baby. Even though it says the house is tiny, she is freely able to move and avoid being crushed. The baby that is in the fetus can only be predicted that it will endanger the mother's life. There is not an absolute to that, which makes the abortion a precaution rather than a last resort. If it is a case of consensual sex, the mother took the risk of taking actions that have a product that can lead to this. Instead of killing one person in the abortion, it can be looked at as trying to save two lives instead of one by not having the abortion, thus avoiding the right to life case by deciding which right trumps the other and having the potential to save more than just one life. Even in a case of rape, there is still an outcome where both the mother and child both live instead of one being decided to be the only one to…

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    While I am pro-choice like Warren, I do not agree with the entirety of her argument. Her qualifications for personhood exclude several groups from the moral community, such as infants and young toddlers. Through her reasoning, there would be just as little harm in killing an two year old child as in killing a three month old fetus. Therefore, I don’t think her qualifications to be included into the moral community are acceptable. I do agree with her point about a fetus’ potential rights, though- that they have some rights, but not full rights, and therefore the woman’s right to her own body override…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The rights of the mother exceed the rights of the unborn child, because she has spent (however many years) getting to wherever she is in life therefore, why should her life be taken away because of one mistake she has made, by something that does not know who she is or what her situation may be. By saying that the rights of the unborn child are greater, is saying that the creator of the life is inferior to the life itself and that makes no sense…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Warren’s thesis is that fetuses are not persons and since only persons have full moral rights and person-like beings have a right to life in particular, fetuses do not have a right to life. She argues that fetuses are not persons because they lack the basic qualifying traits of personhood or moral humanity. She also believes that the rights of persons will always override the rights of potential persons and that there should be no restrictions on when an abortion must occur by. Her argument is a direct response to Noonan’s thesis which is that fetuses are humans and therefore have human rights.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First she looks at the meaning of being human. There can be two different ways to look at the meaning of being human, in a moral sense and a genetic sense. People as a whole often overlook that fact and group both together, or even using one as an equate for the other. Warren uses a set of premises here to objectify this. The argument states that since “(1) it is wrong to kill innocent human beings, and (2) fetuses are innocent human beings, then (3) it is wrong to kill fetuses” (Warren 23).…

    • 1995 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Abortion: A Woman's Right

    • 4396 Words
    • 18 Pages

    In, "Abortion: A Moderate View", L.W. Sumner outlines what he calls the "established" views on abortion. He follows by arguing for what he calls a "moderate" view. This essay will provide both an explanation of Sumner's philosophical position and a critical evaluation of that position. In addition to the above, Sumner's position will be juxtaposed against that of Mary Anne Warren and Donald Marquis' positions on the moral and legal status of the fetus and abortion.…

    • 4396 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pro Choice or Pro Life?

    • 1905 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The right of the unborn to live supercedes any right of a woman to control her own body.…

    • 1905 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the article, “My body, My employer, My abortion” by Loren Clark-Moe, stated the argument that every women is fully capable of making appropriate decisions about their health, their body, and life just as she made for herself.…

    • 1944 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays