Preview

How The United Kingdom And France Has Affected How Their Governments

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
590 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How The United Kingdom And France Has Affected How Their Governments
Governments have existed since the civilization of man. Throughout the numerous centuries, people have been governed or controlled by these institutions set by either… Governments and how the power is distributed within said institutions can be a direct result of their history. By looking at historical figures and events of the unitary nations the United Kingdom and France, one can see how historical occurrences effected how their governments are run today.
Off the northern coast of France lies the island nation of the United Kingdom. In the UK, they have a parliamentary system of government. The UK’s government is set in the model of a constitutional monarchy. In today’s British constitutional monarchy, the reigning monarch is the head of state who is little more than a
…show more content…
England has a long history of reducing the political power of the monarchy and giving authority to a body that started as a small council of the King’s chief vassals and evolve into the legislative body known as Parliament.
The history of Parliament began with the Norman Conquest of the island in 1066. When Duke William II of Normandy conquered Anglo-Saxon England and was crowned King William I of England, he brought over the political and economic structures of feudalism for the mainland. Feudalism can be described as a collection of legal and military customs. Basically, it was the way society was structured. It revolved around the relationships traced from the agreement between a lord and a vassal. Land, which is owned by the lord, can be portioned into multiple pieces. The lord can give a person one of these portions and the laborers bound to said land. In exchange, the person became a vassal or subordinate of that lord. Vassals were required to give military service and pay a tax to their lord. Kings were the supreme lord of the land. When his power was consolidated, King William parceled land to his supports. Men who are given land directly from the King or a territorial

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Middle Ages DBQ

    • 582 Words
    • 1 Page

    land by lords. Land given to the vassals by lords were called fiefs. According to the the…

    • 582 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the later portion of the 1600’s, the monarchial systems of both England and France were changing. England strayed away from an absolute monarch and ran toward a mightier parliament instead. The opposite was occurring in France as Louis XIV strengthened his own office while weakening the general assembly of France, the Estates General. Absolutism, the political situation in which a monarch controls makes all political, social, economic, and cultural decisions in a government without checks or balances, had been introduced by Charles I and James I. However, it never took hold. In France, Louis XIV took absolutism to extremes, claiming to be a servant of God. A limited monarch, England’s monarchial system, is a government in which a monarch…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Feudalism was also a social and economics organization based on a series of reciprocal relationships. The king in theory owned the land which he granted to lords who in return would give service, usually in the form of military aid, to the king. The receiver of the land became a vassal, and these grants of land were known as fiefs. Sometimes these fiefs were larger than a lord could administer. So he, in turn, granted use of part of the land to lesser lords who pledged their service in return. This system continued…

    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    -Large landowners living away and set up their private armies. Farmers trade land for protections. Therefore, lord gained more power and it’s the beginning of feudal system.…

    • 7725 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In medieval Europe, country life was governed by a system call “feudalism.” In a feudal society, the king gave large pieces of land called fiefs to noblemen and bishops. Peasants without land were known as serfs, they did most of the work on the fiefs: They planted and harvested crops and gave most of the produce to the landowner. In exchange for their labor, they were allowed to live on the land.…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are mainly two types of governments that emerged during the seventeenth century. Most of the political development took place in France and England. Absolute monarchy took over throughout France while constitutionalism, or parliamentary monarchy, was becoming popular in England between 1640 and 1780. France’s absolute monarchy developed because of the nobles and kings focused on the concept of divine right. England, on the other hand, developed through the businessmen and landowners trying to prevent the central concentration of political power. These governments grasped the attention of philosophers, leaders, and churches. Eventually, both would develop and influence the modern world today in Europe and the Americas.…

    • 1353 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Asdfghji

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Feudalism - Nobles were given land owned by the king in exchange for loyalty and military services.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Providian trust officers often spend a large amount of time correcting statements, costing the company between $2 Million to $5 Million because of the inaccurate statements.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The feudal system is a very big system, filled with rich history. Society was dependent on the feudal system, it was the modern legal system for roughly 1600 years through out Europe, in use from 300 A.D to 1400. The Feudal system was based on allocation of land in return for service. The feudal system could be organized in layers and is often looked at in a diagram of a pyramid, with the most honorable and looked after people were towards the top of the pyramid, and the common people towards the base. There were several groups within this pyramid, varying in distance from the top of the pyramid and base, each group under the highest authority was a vassals to the groups directly above them, this meaning that they swore loyalty to them. The…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the beginning of the 1600s, England and France had one goal in mind, complete and absolute power. In the second half of the seventeenth century, we see England evolve from an absolutist monarchy into a monarchy that could only rule by consent of the parliament. France, on the other hand, continued with an almighty king.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of a single person holding dominion over all others to form an independent state is the driving force in state consolidation in 17th century Europe. Political development in this concept led to different methods of operating a government two prominent models being absolutism and constitutionalism. The first one centers on a strong centralized monarchy and the dominating royal power and the latter is based on a limited monarchy where the ruler is confined to the law and parliament. Theoretically, England planned to follow the constitutional model but the Stuart monarchs thought otherwise of this and conflicted with the Parliament throughout the century. This conflict centers on the evolution of England to becoming a world power.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government is one of if not the most factor in properly controlling an area. Before the age of global interdependence, Europe was ruled by an absolute monarchy. A king and a queen had absolute power. As this era began, two forms of government emerged: the absolutist monarchies of France and Spain and the constitutional monarchies of England and the Netherlands. England and the Netherlands saw the majority of change; they went from an absolute monarchy to a constitutional form where there were some limitations to the power of the king. France and Spain; however, stayed mostly constant in…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To compare the distinctive features of primate parenting, we first need to know what they are. Primate parenting features including, feeding their offspring, along with teaching them vital skills in order for them to obtain their own food. An example of this would be the variety of tool using, or culture, used by several primates (using rocks to crack open nuts, or using a branch to get ants and consume them) not only demonstrate the learning ability of these creatures, but also the importance that parenting has when dealing with the development of the offspring. Apart from the learning behaviors that are thought to the offspring, other distinctive parenting features come into play, for example primates usually give birth to more than one offspring…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The lowest strata of society remained the peasant. The peasant supported all other estates of society not only through direct taxation but in the production of agriculture and the keeping of livestock. The peasant was the property of whomever he was subject to. Be it bishop, prince, a town or a noble, the peasant and all things associated with him were subject to any whim whatsoever. Countless taxes were exacted on the peasant, forcing more and more of his time to be spent working on his lord’s estate. Most of what he produced was taken in the form of a tithe or some other tax. The peasant could not hunt, fish or chop wood freely in the early sixteenth century as the lords had recently taken these commonly held lands for their own purposes. The lord had rights to use the peasant’s land as he wished; the peasant could do nothing but watch idly by as his crops were destroyed by wild game and nobles on the chivalric hunt. When a peasant wished to marry, he required the lord's permission as well as having to pay a tax. When the peasant died, the lord was entitled to his best cattle, his best garment and his best tool.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper will examine the history of the “War on Drugs” and the racial and sentencing disparities that have resulted because of it. In the House of Representatives a new bill was introduced on January 7, 2009. Policy number H.R.265, was cited as “Drug Sentencing reform and Cocaine Kingpin Trafficking Act of 2009. The never ending drug trade and the policies that try to limit it, have far-reaching impacts in the United States and other countries. Over the last twenty years, U.S. politicians have responded to mounting drug abuse at the local and national levels with increasingly unjustly legislation. Cooperatively, these measures have become known as the ‘War on Drugs’. In the United States, these policies have focused on the link between drug, gang activity, and crime, emphasizing punishment over treatment. Mandatory minimum sentences for drug offenses have been put in place, leading to an explosion in the number of people incarcerated nationwide. Racial disparities in drug sentencing, particularly in crack vs. powder cocaine offenses, also stem from the ‘War on Drugs’ policy. The War on Drugs is a prevention campaign that was established by the United States Government with the aid of participating countries, with the intention of reducing illegal drug trade. This initiative includes a set of laws and policies that are intended to discourage the manufacturing and distribution of illegal substances. The term was first used by then President Richard Nixon in 1969. In June of, Nixon officially declares a "war on drugs," identifying drug abuse as public enemy No. 1. Then in October of 1986 President Ronald Reagan signed the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of, which appropriated $1.7 billion to fight the drug war. The bill also created mandatory minimum penalties for drug offenses, which are criticized for promoting…

    • 2419 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays