Manifest Destiny, or land stealing? The war against mexico and the us, which took place north of the Rio Grande, broke out May 1846. The land north of the Rio Grande was disputed by the US and Mexico. Because the United States decided to occupy disputed territory Mexico attacked. With that said, is the United States justified in declaring war against Mexico? The United States was not justified in going to war because they deprived Mexico from their land, occupying territory in dispute and it was mexico's territory.…
Was Mexico justified to go to war with the United States? This essay argues the US was justified because Mexico invaded US territory, Mexician territories needed a new government, and Mexican territories didn´t respect the US reconciliation. Mexico invaded the United States terrirory. The quote that supports this is,”Mexico has passed the boundry of the United States… has invaded our territory and shed American blood upon the American soil. ”(Polk).…
The United States was unjustified when going to war with Mexico for multiple reasons. One of the biggest reasons was the expansion of a slavery state. Texas is very large and great for growing cotton, so if the U.S. annexed Texas, a very large slave state would be added. The second reason was that James Polk provoked the war. He was also a big believer in Manifest Destiny. This meant that he wanted to expand the land of the U.S. , and His motto was “54 40 or fight” which meant expanding the U.S. up to the northern boundary of the Oregon territory. If this goal was not achieved, they would go to war to get it.…
The U.S had a clear and valid reason on why they needed to move into Mexico. Mexico, essentially, invited Americans to live in the province of Texas, which turned out to be a bad idea in the end. So, was the United States justified in going to war with Mexico? The answer to that question would be yes, the U.S was justified in going to war with Mexico because their population was overgrowing and they needed more land, their economic depressions made people want to live in frontier areas, and living in frontier areas would create many new opportunities for commerce and self-advancement.…
The Mexican-American war stared in 1821 after Mexico won its independence from Spain, thus allowing American settlers to move into the newly unoccupied territory. The Victorians of the war, were the Americans. After the war came to an end, Mexico signed the treaty of Guadalupe hidalgo. In the treaty Mexico agreed to give 500,000mi to the U.S., while the united states paid Mexico $15 million. There are many different point of views towards the Mexican-American war. The United states was not justified by going to war with Mexico because, they fought for what belonged to Mexico in the first place. And they used the belief of Manifest Destiny to overspread our country ignorantly.…
One reason the Mexican War was not justified was because the United States stole land from Mexico. In Document A, it states that Anglo-Saxons have began building schools and other buildings in California, which, at the time, still belonged to Mexico. Document D talks about how the U.S. citizens just moved into Texas simply because of Manifest Destiny-- the idea that the United States should expand. This evidence shows the U.S. was not justified in going to war because they basically stole most of Mexico’s land by moving onto them or marking them with their own property such as…
Having many settlers all over the territories supported them in gaining this. For example, by 1830 there were more than 20.000 Americans lived in Texas and they were opposing Mexicans government. “These settlers did not intend to become Mexican citizens. Instead, they planned to take over Texas.” (Out of Many, 245) Thus, it leaded to the war. Although Mexican-American war gained so many pros and contras, but it was clear that the government at that time did whatever it takes to complete their Manifest Destiny. It was the president James K.Polk from Democratic Party who was an expansionist. He was optimistic to make America stretched from the east until west coast. So, he sent his secret envoy, John Slidell to offer Mexico some money in order to buy their lands but Slidell was rejected. Angry Polk sent his army to the disputed zone making his soldiers involved in skirmish with Mexican soldiers. He lied that Mexico started it first and asked congress for war; “War exist, and, notwithstanding all our efforts to avoid it, exists by the act of Mexico herself. This claim of President Polk’s was of course contrary to fact.” (Out of Many, 247) It was clear that he wanted to expand America, although by war, because the beginning of the war was confusing, no one knows what the reality happened at the border that raised the war. Even Abraham Lincoln questioned Polk’s account of the border incident. (Out…
America was not justified in going to war with Mexico for these three reasons: James K. Polk provoked the war, territory wasn’t decided and Polk sent troops into Texas. The key argument that is summarized here is that America was not justified in going to war with Mexico. In conclusion America was greatly changed during the war with Mexico and it should never be…
The United States in 1846 was not justified in going to war with Mexico. The United States did not have proper justification to respond with violence against the Mexican government. The war with Mexico was also a product of the United States’ belief of Manifest Destiny. Polk’s over ambition to seize new territory from the Mexicans and disappointment over their refusal to sell him California also possibly played a factor in his willingness to wage war against Mexico. The United States under the leadership of President Polk clearly provoked Mexico into attacking US troops. To no extent was the Mexican War a justifiable war. All these reasons show that the US had no business starting a war with Mexico for territory that was rightfully theirs.…
One reason the Mexican war was justified was because of the Manifest Destiny. (Doc A) When we’re welcoming Mexicans into the Texas territory, they’re keeping the U.S. from expanding. America needs land because of our massive population. Mexico’s government is so deprived that they can’t keep California. If Mexico can’t afford California, how will they even afford Texas? America will eventually have California, but that’s not enough for our evolution population. This evidence shows the U.S. was justified in going to war because Mexico can’t control the land they already have; America has more population than Mexico, the U.S. should have more land.…
In my opinion I think it was just a war,I’m not saying that what the US did was the right way to go about gaining the land.It had been many wars prior and many more to come about land/territories .At this time I think the US was just land hungry and when James K. Polk became president he was able to annexed Texas.Through his actions this made Mexico mad which lead the the Mexican-American War.At the end of the war american gained the land but still had conflicts about slavery and it being a free territory.Mexico should of been careful with welcoming in American immigrants because sometimes you cannot trust everybody.But in all fairness Texas became better because the Mexico government was already…
The Mexican-American War was a war between the United States and Mexico which lasted from April 1846 to February 1848. It stemmed from the United States' annexation of Texas in 1845 and from a dispute over whether Texas ended at the Nueces River (Mexican claim) or the Rio Grande (U.S. claim). The war was the most devastating event in Mexican history, where Mexico lost the modern day areas of California, Arizona, New Mexico, Nevada, Colorado and Montana. The Mexican-American spawned out of land lust. The idea of Manifest Destiny and the promising lands of California, which were coveted by many European nations, led to a war of greed. Even Abraham Lincoln, then a young Congressman, and Ulysses S. Grant, the future Civil War victorious commander and U.S. President, believed that the invasion of Mexico was not justified.…
The definition of “justified” is having, done for, or marked by a good or legitimate reason. The second definition is declared or made righteous in the sight of God. The war with Mexico was both of these definitions. It was justified. In 1836, Texas had won it’s independence and had become apart of America. Mexico had attacked U.S. soldiers on Texas territory. Polk became president. He believed in Manifest Destiny. Manifest Destiny was the belief that God wanted America to spread across the continent. Polk wanted to fulfill that destiny and get Texas and California. The United States was justified in going to war with Mexico because they believed in Manifest Destiny, Texas was already apart of America, and Americans were killed on their own soil by Mexicans.…
One reason the US was unjustified is that Polk provoked Mexico. He was a strong believer of Manifest Destiny. He believed that it was God’s plan to kick out Mexicans and let the USA grows more. He stole Texas from Mexico (Doc.B). This evidence shows that the US was unjustified in going…
“America’s wars have often been controversial” (Roden 317). The Mexican- American War was not an exception to this rule. Many Mexicans felt that they were cheated their land. On the other hand, the US felt it was their destiny to conquer the whole North American continent and Mexico was in the way of their greatness (Roden 317). The belief in Manifest Destiny, that the USA started the conflict, and that the US had no right to Texas are all reasons that the US was not justified in taking about half of Mexico.…