Preview

If I Could Choose Everything In The Giver

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
569 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
If I Could Choose Everything In The Giver
It would be much safer if the government had chosen everything for our daily lives, every aspect of everything, but it would be really weird. The government would go mad with power and all war would break loose. People who had to follow the same rules their whole lives would purge the streets, causing whatever kind of mayhem that they please. There would be no limit. Life is better off if the citizens get to make their own free choices, but still rule under the government’s ruling. The government should leave most of the decisions up to the people, and make the really big, important decisions. But if society chose everything for us and somehow it all worked out, there would be a few things that I would be glad are gone. For example, after everyone got used to the idea of being brainwashed by the federal government, maybe the crime rate would go down. Also, with everyone on a strict eating schedule, obesity would be swept off the face of the Earth. And, for example of how in The Giver everyone rode bikes around instead of cars, and there were no big factories, pollution would never be a problem. Also, how in The …show more content…
Politics, for example, would be something that I would miss ranting about. Unfortunately, in a perfect world there would be no politics. In a perfect world, there would be no ranting, because there would be nothing to rant about. I don’t think there would be any television, because they would want everybody to be in perfect shape. In The Giver, they have this thing where they talk about their day and they cannot hide any details. That would be awful. I hate hearing people talk about their day, and I would die if I had to share every aspect of what I did that particular day. Even with all of the problems that I like to complain about, the government would take our will to live. They would own us, and we wouldn’t be able to make choices of our

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Governments are good at keeping order, but sometimes they get out of control. They’ll control the media to make the public think the way they want them to. They’ll put in laws and regulations to back people into a corner. I believe that our own government these days has too much power and the people running it should be out of the whole deal.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The statement “that government is best which governs not at all” is a statement that I agree in. If government isn’t doing what it was designed to do then why do we have it in the first place? Many people in our nation today believe that government has more power and can do more things than the people can do. That really is not the case. If we vow to one thing in our nation and more people get involved we can change the world. I think David Thoreau though differently on this matter. We can see that a stronger and more interruption of government is not always the best.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There would be nothing special no new famous art, no new phones and no new games; all of which many people use or enjoy in the current day and…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Absolute Government

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is known that a state without government is a state in chaos and confusion. What the best possible form of government should be has been debated by political philosophers over time. To vigorously ensure the well-being of a state, the government of that state should be absolute or one in which all power is vested in a single ruler. A monarch's authority to govern should be absolute because God establishes kings, decisions would be made quicker, and there would be less conflict between differing parties.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author of this article is Daniel J. Solove. He discusses the different perspectives and opinions of various people of the government’s control of viewing personal information. The article demonstrates this through examples of what people say, book references, and the opinion of the article himself. In the article, “The Nothing to Hide Argument”, Daniel J. Solove argues that the information- gathering programs the government uses to track and record information from people are problematic.(739) This still remains the case even if the information gathered from these programs was information people did not mind being uncovered. (739).…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Relationship between liberty and security cannot be balanced, because liberty and safety are not equal, as one created the other. It can only work together, and my preference would be for freedom. If I had to make the only one choice, I would never give up freedom. Without freedom, security is going to look like life in the cage. People are going to be like domestic animals unable to do anything without permission of their leader. The things that differ people from animals are their minds, ability to think, knowledge, and right to have choices and make mistakes, learning from mistakes and not repeating them in the future. Fluffy little pets wait for the food and a pat and if they do not get it they would just die, if people would give up freedom, they would not be better than animals. I truly believe that life similar to that of a pet is definitely not the best…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Texas Political Culture

    • 4533 Words
    • 19 Pages

    In the past, government had broke the people’s trust, and ever since then, laws were made to make sure the government doesn’t have so much power to where it can ruin us. These laws helped people have their say on what should happen in a certain state/country which helps us even today. Those laws are what gives us our individual rights…

    • 4533 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Euthanasia as defined by the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary is a quiet and easy death. One may wonder, is there such a thing as a quiet and easy death? This is one point that I will discuss in my paper, however the question that my paper will answer is; should active euthanasia be legalized? First, I will look at Philippa Foot's article on Euthanasia and discuss my opinions on it. Second, I will look at James Rachel's article on active and passive euthanasia and discuss why I agree with his argument. Finally, I will conclude by saying that while the legalizing of active euthanasia would benefit many people, it would hurt too many, thus I believe that it should not be legalized.…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ender's Game

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As I mentioned before, government does have a small role in our personal lives in America, although some people might not realize it. After the tragedy of 9/11, the government stepped up efforts to prevent another terrorism attack on the U.S. Specifically, in The 9/11 Dilemma: Freedom vs. Security, it said “... Congress united to pass the Patriot Act, which expanded the government’s powers to conduct counterterrorism surveillance and investigations.” This gave the government the ability to do many new things, such as to monitor phone calls, conduct surveillance on anyone, and to go through household trash. In the second reference document I was given called Preserving Life and Liberty, it described more of the governments rights with the Patriot Act. It stated that the government could have access to library records, and could perform searches without first obtaining a warrant.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government must take decisive action to protect citizens during times of crisis. During periods of stability, however, citizens must have freedom from unnecessary government control. This source is a reflection of modern liberalism, the author believe that the government should not infringe on people’s rand freedoms during time of peace and stability. However during times of crisis, the government should take away the rights and freedoms of citizens.…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Synthesis Argument

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Do you want to have everything decided for you? Does that make you feel safe and comfortable? How about confused and concerned? Do you see too many laws that restrict your freedom? Government protects people from threats and is not to unnecessarily legislate that restricts freedom and governs morality but to leave that to the realm of individual responsibility.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In life, us humans are not able to make all of our own decisions all of the time. Every decision we make is mostly for our own good, but we have to think if it will past other wishes too. The government has wishes that us Americans have to follow and if the rules or laws were to be disobeyed then there will be restrictions or punishments depending on how big the law broke was. America is the land of the free and independent, but no one ever mentions the challenge of personal independence there is.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our lives are better when the government doesn’t interfere because government shouldn’t get in the way of people’s daily lives, day after day. Let people be. We shouldn’t have to live with the mentally of the government being on our tail at all times. We should have peace of mind, especially when it comes to our privacy. We shouldn’t have to be told that we can and can’t do, even though it could be perfectly fine, but just because they say that…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “I don’t know how bad things are in America, but in the UK I cannot emphasize it enough: standards of punctuation are abysmal” [xx of the Introduction] Truss’ whole purpose of her novel is to try and fix poor grammar and punctuation that many people now obtain. Many examples are given of poor punctuation in the UK that should be simple and taught at a very young age. I’m here to agree that many people in the United States also have horrid punctuation.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Life of Pi, Yann Martel, through the main character in the book, Pi, makes the following statement, “I know zoos are no longer in people’s good graces. Religion faces the same problem. Certain illusions about freedom plague them both.”…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays