Preview

Immanuel Kant's Grounding For The Metaphysics Of Mo

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2082 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Immanuel Kant's Grounding For The Metaphysics Of Mo
Immanuel Kant’s Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals challenges traditional moral perspectives with abstract concepts that are explained with great depth. Section three of Kant’s philosophical work introduces the concept of freedom as the key for an explanation of the autonomy of the will. Kant interprets freedom as a means to acting without the restrictions of personal emotions, desires, and the influence of the external world. In my essay I will prove that Kant’s account of the concept of freedom is significant because it encourages individuals to live a moral life completely free of internal desires and external forces and to follow laws that the individual has created for themselves. Additionally, I will establish that Kant’s account …show more content…
Freedom must be held by in every situation to the activity of rational beings who possess a will. Every rational being who has a will also has the idea of freedom. Only under this idea of freedom can a rational being act (Kant 50). The idea of morality comes from the concept of freedom. Every rational human being can act with autonomy of the will. If one has a will then inevitably, they possess freedom. A rational being who has the ability to practically reason has casualty in reference to its objects. Reason is the author of its principles which are free from foreign influences. Practical reason or the will of a rational being must regard itself as free. The will of a rational being can be a will of its own exclusively under the idea of freedom and that will must be assigned to all rational beings (Kant 50). It is important to clarify that reason is the use of one’s own judgement to make a decision and to do otherwise is rash and impulsive. Reason means freedom to decide for oneself by consulting with oneself. Now, I will move forward with an explanation of Kant’s ideas concerning the interest attached to the ideas of …show more content…
It is revolutionary to believe that one can be morally free by adhering to the laws that they themselves have decided to follow and free from foreign forces. It is possible for one to think and act with reason. The concept of freedom Kant’s account of freedom is convincing because he presents the role of freedom as an achievable mindset that any individual who has the desire to accomplish can if they so choose. The possibility of acting morally is high when one adheres to the inevitable regulations of the intelligible world. The intelligible world is guided by laws of reason. This world is free. The individual within the intelligible world is subject to the autonomy of the will. An individual may be a member of the intelligible world and the world of sense simultaneously. In the world of sense one’s actions must align, thus, one’s will will be influenced by foreign influences. When one transfers himself to the viewpoint of the intelligible world,he is forced to implement the concept of freedom, he becomes conscious of having a good will because he is independent of determination of the world of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s essays Critique of Pure Reason and Critique of Practical Reason led to his critique Religion Within the Limits of Reason Alone.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the way that Kant has been interpreted as a constructivist under the standard model, as Wood’s revealed, one can remark three points about this approach: Overemphasizing on the Formula of Universal Law (FUL), Conception of Value, Conception of Autonomy.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Having described Kant’s examples of acts done out of duty and desire, I will know discuss the conclusion he makes about moral worth using these examples. Kant makes the conclusion that in order for a person’s actions to have moral worth they must be done without desire.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kant vs. Mill

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages

    First, I will talk about the theories and views held by philosopher Immanuel Kant. Kant argues that only rational beings can count as moral agents and the perspective of moral concern extends only to rational beings. This perspective is the nucleus of Kant philosophy. A large aspect of the possession of reason, in Kant’s view, is the ability to gain knowledge that cannot be shown as false through experience and, just by thought, can be learned. A good example of this a priori knowledge is, “the sum of the angles of a square is 360 degrees.” Anyone who has studied geometry knows once it has been proved we can say that we beings can possess this type of knowledge, and having this knowledge can allow a being to make a judgment about their action. The ability to possess this knowledge to determine an action leads me to Kant’s next claim.…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 3

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Consider what Immanuel Kant would say, and explain that with reference to this week’s readings.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ethics

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant’s definition of human autonomy is too formalised and hard to achieve -> ideal, unattainable, hard to achieve…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is clear from the preceding that the aims we may have in actions, and their effects, as ends and incentives of the will, can impart to the actions no unconditioned and moral worth. In what, then, can this worth lie, if it is not supposed to exist in the will, in the relation of the actions to the effect hoped for? It can lie nowhere else than in the principle of the will, without regard to the ends that can be effected through such action; for the will is at a crossroads, as it were, between its principle a priori, which is formal, and its incentive a posteriori, which is material, and since it must somehow be determined by something, it must be determined through the formal principle in general of the volition if it does an action from duty, since every material principle has been withdrawn from it (Kant…

    • 2750 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to the Kantian theory,2 respect for autonomy flows from the recognition that all persons have unconditional worth, each having the capacity to determine his or her own moral destiny. Kantian ethics argue that autonomy is based on the human capacity to direct one’s life according to rational principles; rationality is the means to autonomy and autonomous people are considered as being ends in themselves in that they have the capacity to determine their own destiny. And as such must be respected. If this is the case then all autonomous decisions made by humans should be respected, regardless of whether they are based on sound moral principles or not. If humans should be respected because of their ability to direct their lives according to rational…

    • 2184 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    An individual end has value because it fulfills a personal need or want. A rational being must establish reasoning or personal justification for the integrity of a personalized end. Valuing individual rationale suggest that an individual values rational thinking in its entirety.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is in the third antinomy where Kant addresses the possibility of freedom with causal necessity. Transcendental freedom is only possible for Kant if both the thesis and the antithesis of the dialectic are shown to be correct. By demonstrating both the thesis and the antithesis to be correct, Kant hopes to show that applying the question of freedom to the unconditioned totality of appearances is bound to lead towards irreconcilable errors. It is only by accepting the transcendental idealist position about the unknowability of the totality of appearances and its relationship to freedom, that we can postulate the notion of freedom for practical application. It is from this practical application that Kant's moral philosophy can come about.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A theory that has attacked the validity of discussions on freedom in modern philosophy is determinism. In these discussions, questions have arisen as to how the truth or falsity of this theory should affect our lives. In this essay I will discuss the formal implications, illustrated by Peter Strawson, that come about from this. This will mean discussion of our reactive attitudes on: our moral considerations and on our inter-personal relationships with others in general. With this in mind, I will argue in favour of the idea that the truth or falsity of determinism is not of legitimate concern to those seeking a rational justification of our moral practices and inter-personal relationships. Furthermore, I will give further details about how we actually do justify our reactive attitudes on these two ideas in order to better illustrate what we can consider as alternative features affecting our moral considerations and inter-personal relationships.…

    • 1904 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant Third Antinomy

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The antinomies of pure reason are among the most important sections in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, and transcendental philosophy in general. Among the antinomies, none were more well-recognized than the third antinomy, which concerns the nature of freedom and determinism. This antinomy went on to pave the way for the rest of German Idealism and several issues regarding interpretation and relevance are still pertinent today: the relationship between the second analogy and the third antinomy, the exact relationship with transcendental Idealism and the coherence and completeness of the arguments. Among contemporary Kant scholars, Henry Allison and Eric Watkins both have radically different interpretations on the success and importance of the third antinomy. This essay will argue that both of these interpretations of the third antinomy run into several fatal problems that demand a radical reinterpretation of the third antinomy.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant says that humans are free to the extent that we act according to our own free will. Kant believes that there are two types of knowledge, a priori and experience. Majority of the knowledge that we have is from experience. A priori is reasoning that proceeds from theoretical deduction. Kant’s theory of reality is an act is only moral when it is committed from a sense of duty.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant Autonomy Vs Autonomy

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Autonomy/Heteronomy/Free Will/Classical Conditioning: What does each individually and holistically argue? And how, if possible, can they be related? What does it mean fundamentally to us as human? Kant argues that we as human beings have pure practical reason, to which he means that we are able to construct rationality from various thought processes an act accordingly given those measures because we are persons capable and worthy of respect.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Deontology is the ethical view that some actions are morally forbidden or permitted regardless of consequences. One of the most influential deontological philosophers in history is Immanuel Kant who developed the idea of the Categorical Imperative. Kant believed that the only thing of intrinsic moral worth is a good will. Kant says in his work Morality and Rationality "The good will is not good because of what it effects or accomplishes or because of it's adequacy to achieve some proposed end; it is good only because of it's willing, i.e., it is good of itself". A maxim is the generalized rule that characterizes the motives for a person's actions. For Kant, a will that is good is one that is acting by the maxim of doing the right thing because it is right thing to do. The moral worth of an action is determined by whether or not it was acted upon out of respect for the moral law, or the Categorical Imperative. Imperatives in general imply something we ought to do however there is a distinction between categorical imperatives and hypothetical imperatives. Hypothetical imperatives are obligatory so long as we desire X. If we desire X we ought to do Y. However, categorical imperatives are not subject to conditions. The Categorical Imperative is universally binding to all rational creatures because they are rational. Kant proposes three formulations the Categorical Imperative in his Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Moral, the Universal Law formulation, Humanity or End in Itself formulation, and Kingdom of Ends formulation. In this essay, the viablity of the Universal Law formulation is tested by discussing two objections to it, mainly the idea that the moral laws are too absolute and the existence of false positives and false negatives.…

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays