In the time span of 40 years after the end of the Era of Good Feelings in 1824, the United States of America experienced economic crises regarding banks, the upcoming of popular sovereignty, and the insurrection of conflict for women’s suffrage (to no prevail). When President Lincoln was elected into office in 1860, the nation had fragmented into two: the Northern Union and the Southern Confederacy, no longer being a “united nation”. The apportioning standards between the Union and the Confederacy dealt with the issues of slavery and black citizenship, political division between Democrats and Republicans, and the unstable economy within the South due to the Reconstruction with North booming from industry and those useful interchangeable parts causing America to develop into a nation divided in two.…
The issue of the tariffs arose about 40 years before the start of the Civil War and was the main cause of the feeling of sectionalism, which made it harder for the states to agree and solve the other issues that came up before the start of the civil war. The North favored tariffs because the people in the North believed that if no tariffs were set, or if tariffs were set too low, they would be undersold by other countries and other manufacturers. The North wanted tariffs because they saw tariffs as a protection policy for its industry and its workers. The South was opposed to tariffs because the people of the South felt that tariffs placed on imported goods would hurt the trade relationships with other countries that they had built. The South…
According to the mentioned documents, the two major groups, sectionalism, and nationalism, have been back and forth over control over the United States over the time period 1815 to 1858. Nationalism, has been proven in the documents to be a force that brings countries closer together. Sectionalism, however has been proved to do just the opposite, in…
* Slavery and cultivation of cotton as cash crop isolated southern states from economic developments in rest of U.S.…
James Henry Hammond, a passionate supporter of slavery, delivered a speech about the importance of cotton to the economy. This speech, named “Cotton is King” discussed the indistinguishable divide between the Northern industry, and Southern plantations. The Southern plantations produced cotton that the industrial North later spun, sewed, and stitched before exporting to trade partners. At the time that this speech was delivered, the United States consumed cotton at an alarming rate, so the South attempted to use this argument to justify their ownership of slaves. However, the North had twice the amount of economic prosperity in population, commodity output, farm acreage, factories, and railroad mileage. The North’s economic stability shows that it didn’t rely on the South, debunking the myth claimed in “Cotton is King” and falsifying another argument in favor of slavery. The failure of the Constitution to mention slavery, or slavery in relation to the economy, allowed the South to argue the use of slavery because of its positive benefit to the national…
Before the Civil War, the Northern and Southern cultures were accepted. By the 19th century sectional antagonism began to slowly decrease from the disagreements and disputes leading up to the Civil War. This made the United States truly ‘one nation.’ Slavery being the main cause of the Union, began to influence a good outcome.…
The. Timmons, Greg. A. “How Slavery Became the Economic Engine of the South.” HISTORY, 25 July 2023,…
The increase in sectionalism and the tensions that arose from it was surprising to me because I naively assumed the United States was for the most completely united at this point in Antebellum America. The political polarization and its dramatic impact on the political landscape of the 1850s was very interesting to learn about. The creation of two political parties, Democrats and Whigs, really cemented the notion of the divide between North and South. The rise of such parties as the Free-Soil Party and the Know-Nothings, or the American Party, is very reminiscent of today’s political climate. While the undertones of the slavery debate create divides even within political parties, the concerns of the nativist movement shifting towards the immigration…
The North introduced high tariffs in order to exploit the productions of slavery in the South. If they couldn’t prevent it, why not benefit from it? And who was to know, maybe some extra money would be beneficial in the future because of the constant political struggles. The number one cash crop was cotton, also known as “King Cotton.” The South was outraged about the tariffs.…
Imagine what our country would be like without nationalism and sectionalism. Nationalism and sectionalism have gone back to the 1800’s and continue to go through our country. Two examples of nationalism are the building of roads and canals and the Monroe Doctrine. Each of those brought pride to our country, along with bringing the United States together. An act of sectionalism was the Missouri Compromise. The Missouri Compromise divided our country.…
In reference to our country’s history, sectionalism can be described as bias for a particular region or area in the sacrifice of other places.. The “majority” in this sense would be a particular region (such as the North) and how they would yield the most benefits at the expense of the rest of the United States. In fact, sectionalism arose from the formation of the various colonies. Each colony held their well-being above the others and this mindset was stuck in later years when everything shifted more towards the North and the South. Their differences added to the widening disparity between them.…
The South, being primarily agricultural, opposed tariffs, because they were unable to manufacture the goods they needed and had to import them from Europe or buy them from the North. In the view of the South, tariffs made everything more expensive, and thought that there was unequal distribution of the money derived from the imposition of the tariff. The North, obviously, had a different view on tariffs and favored them. They believed it protected domestic industries from unfair foreign competition and they didn’t have to lower prices on goods to compete with them. At the end of the day, tariffs looked like the North was taxing the South, and this deepened the divide between the two sections, and caused the South to start making plans for…
In the Old Northwest, “the contemporary name for the region north of the Ohio River and west of the Appalachian Mountains” an economy based on foodstuffs with a heavy center in the east focused on the consumption and manufacturing of goods. How did this differ from the southern half of the United States? The economy of the southern states lived by the motto where “Cotton was King.” Furthermore, the South was notable for its soil, climate and labor system, and specifically African-American slaves, as a central part of southern society as well as a critical piece in the southern way of life. It is here we start to see differing ways of life between the northern and southern halves of the country. In relation to the years prior to the Civil War, though, both the north and the south feared the other half’s way of life as a threat. It was southern fear that northern states were gaining an advantage in the number of free states, as well as representation in Congress. Running the numbers, it can be ascertained that out of the twenty-seven states in the Union by 1850, fifteen registered as free states while twelve were slave states. Out of the twenty-seven total states, there were 144 representatives of the northern states, with 82 for the southern states. Numerically we can see how the advantage clearly rests with the northern states in…
Where politicians came from also had a huge influence on their views. Those from the South favored the use of slaves while those from the North opposed it. When it came to deciding whether incoming states would be free or slave states, conflict arose. The Southern states were concerned that if another free state was added, that their candidates would be more likely to lose elections, and vice versa. Finally, the Missouri compromise was brought about which physically drew a line through the country at 36 30. All states above would be free, and all below would be slave states. Cleary, this led to a severe case of sectionalism; the country was divided amongst slave states and free states. With such sectional differences, unity was impossible, despite the fact that only Jeffersonians existed.…
There was much reason to including federalism in The United States Constitution. Madison had put forth The Virginia Plan that was bicameral, favored the larger states, and favored the national government. William Paterson put forth The New Jersey Plan. It was unicameral, favored the small states, and favored state governments. Each plan was reasonable but would not suit every state and most likely cause much outrage from either the small states or the large states. That’s when The Great Compromise was created. This included a bicameral legislature, The Senate, and The House of Representatives. The Senate would equally represent every state, keeping the smaller states satisfied. The House of Representatives would represent the population keeping the larger states satisfied. This compromise created the system known as federalism. Federalism dispersed the power just right so that for the most part things ran smoothly and both the larger states and the small states were happy. This happened properly by giving powers to specific governments.…