Preview

Sectionalism In The 19th Century

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1036 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sectionalism In The 19th Century
Even in the early infancy of America, it is evident that it’s people desired to expand and grow their tiny nation. The New World held so many opportunities for the foreign people with its abundance of land. Though the prosperity of expansion was a major factor, moving into the unexplored land was a cause for most of the countries battles. But, the people’s craving for land was insatiable once they started to branch out. Land was power, and the more you had the better off you’d be in terms of foreign affairs and in the wellbeing of your nation economically. The belief was that expansion would create a big happy united nation, but really it was the factor creating a divide among its citizens. From 1800 to 1850, everything began good, boosting …show more content…
The people were blindly devoted, on either side, to their cause and ruled out negotiations for peace without bloodshed. The 1848 Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo represented this in paper. After the Mexican War, Mexico yielded its territories to the United States. This territory was not covered by the Missouri Compromise, so it opened new debates over which state would be what. It was a major factor to the encroaching Civil War. The annexation of Texas in 1845 was also a massive controversy. The North wildly opposed it because admitting Texas as a slave state would give the South more power in Congress due to the size of the state. As representative Joshua Giddings said, “They, with the Southern states, will control the policy and the destiny of this nation… Are our friends of the North prepared to deliver over this great national policy to the people of Texas?” The North was scared because they were beginning to lose control. The North introduced high tariffs in order to exploit the productions of slavery in the South. If they couldn’t prevent it, why not benefit from it? And who was to know, maybe some extra money would be beneficial in the future because of the constant political struggles. The number one cash crop was cotton, also known as “King Cotton.” The South was outraged about the tariffs. They knew the North benefited from their productions. The South didn’t want their money maker to be stripped from them, for sake of the country’s economy and for their ways of life. Stated by James Hammond, "You daren't make war against cotton! ...Cotton is king!" Southern states felt more animosity toward the North than ever, and it was leading up to something

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Rob Heaney dbq 11 3

    • 890 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of the first main issues that required compromise to create a reasonable solution was the enactment of tariffs on the south. The main export of the south was cotton. Cotton was what supplied the south with almost all of its money. In about 1828 to 1833 the first major conflict between the north and south was created during the Tariff or Nullification Crisis. In 1828, the North enacted a tariff on the south that severely affected their cotton trade. The tax rates were as high as forty five to fifty percent. The tariffs were nicknamed the "Tariffs of Abominations" because the south was so disgusted at the high rates it was facing. The south spoke out against these high rates and the north lowered the tariff rates to thirty three percent. Despite lowering the tariff, South Carolina decided that they were not going to follow the tariff, and not pay it. The reasoning the state had was that they thought they should not have to follow any sort of law or tax that was not beneficial to themselves. South Carolina nullified the tariff and didn't pay them. The north was outraged at this act. The north thought that the if South Carolina was able to repeal the tariff and ignore it, who would be able to stop them from ignoring laws regarding slavery? The north and the federal government were offended and angry. An example of their displeasure is shown in Henry Clay's speech to the Senate when he states "I merely throw out these sentiments for the purpose of showing you that South Carolina having…

    • 890 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The South wanted to use their cash crops in order to help them during a war if one ever ensued. They thought of a plan that could help them do just that: The Cotton Diplomacy. This idea was first brought up by a senator from South Carolina, by the name of James Henry Hammond. In an 1858 speech to the Senate, Hammond claimed that "Cotton was King" and the European nations with whom the South sold cotton to would back them up if there ever was a war (Dictionary of American History, 12/2/07).…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before the war with Mexico, the North and South were having some issues with slavery and the more or less under control of slavery. With the Missouri Compromise they had settled which areas would have slavery and which they would not. And of course, there was still tensions between the North and South about slavery. With the war with Mexico the change with what to make of slavery was making tensions the were much more intense. The war with Mexico led to the taking of huge amounts of land, by the saying that the US had decided that the status of slavery in the new territories that was Mexico’s land.…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The relations between the North and South had disagreements over taxes. The North raised the taxes appointed by Congress on imported goods to support their industrial development. On the contrary, in the South, being an agricultural economy had to buy machinery from the foreign and ending paying for those high taxes. On the 1850s, Congress increased the import tax from 15 to 37 percent. The South threatened the northern mandataries; consequently, the north was offended. Besides, Chicago Daily Times published that if the South withdraws from the north, the economy could be affected as income cutting in half (Stanley, 2011). The southerners were unhappy in how the North was limiting their earnings.…

    • 112 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The increase in sectionalism and the tensions that arose from it was surprising to me because I naively assumed the United States was for the most completely united at this point in Antebellum America. The political polarization and its dramatic impact on the political landscape of the 1850s was very interesting to learn about. The creation of two political parties, Democrats and Whigs, really cemented the notion of the divide between North and South. The rise of such parties as the Free-Soil Party and the Know-Nothings, or the American Party, is very reminiscent of today’s political climate. While the undertones of the slavery debate create divides even within political parties, the concerns of the nativist movement shifting towards the immigration…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The North had an industrial economy based on manufacturing. They supported tariffs because they wanted american goods to be sold at lower prices than British goods could. The South was an agrarian economy based on agriculture, meaning that they supplied themselves by growing their own food. The South opposed the tariffs because it would destroy their economy because it would increase the cost of imported goods. The West was an emerging economy and supported the internal improvements and the sale of public lands. When Jackson’s vice president John C. Calhoun supported the criteria needed for a strong central government but didn’t support the tariffs of abominations. In response to the tariffs of abomination, he created the South Carolina Expositions and Protest. Then protest advanced to the states’ rights doctrine. He argued that, because the states had formed the national government, state power should be greater than federal power. He believed states had the right to nullify, or reject, any federal law they judged to be unconstitutional”(Deverell, William and Deborah Gray White). This would help in the future because it would allow states to be more…

    • 2001 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the fight against Mexico the United States was unified on bringing they land apart of the United States, as a result of winning The new territory it also created a lot of tension among the United States congress. The main reason was over slavery, if it would be allowed over the territory that was just won by the United States which began the compromise of 1850. Both sides were against one another, several congressmen saw this as a opportunity the south to increase farmland and for slavery and the northern congressmen saw these states to create a bigger country and taxable land to put in place a strong representation of government and military. The situation came to stalemate with a compromise they choose to allow the newly won or bought territory to make the difficult…

    • 2008 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There were many major issues that divided our nation in the early days of the 19th Century. One of the major issues was the expansion of America. America was conquering more and more land which lead to disagreements about what to do with the land. This led to Americans building roadways and waterways. American’s were fighting over land and wanting more slaves to work on their lands.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Sectionalism

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Sectionalism started division when all the territorial issues came into the picture. In 1845, at the end of Tyler’s Presidency, Texas became a part of the country. Tyler felt that the annexation was the correct decision for the time because he was leaving office,…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tariffs were placed on foreign manufactured goods. The South heavily relied on manufactured goods, and due to having little industry they continuously had to pay tariffs and they felt overcharged. This led to the south threatening secession and eventually lower…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The annexation of Texas, Polk first goal, was hated by the North because Texas would enter the country as a slave state. The addition of another slave state would bump the balance of political power in favor of the Southern states. Three days before Polk took office President Taylor signed a joint resolution annexing Texas. The North was extremely upset, but their emotions settled…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Compromise of 1850 was an effort to pacify the rising tensions between the north and the south. The issue of slavery was becoming a problem that none could overlook. This bitter rivalry was heating up even more so after the Mexican-American war. America won substantial amount of land, which stretched all the way to Mexico City. This land would give the south a grand portion of political power, surpassing the North.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Manifest Destiny created conflicts between many neighbors, and one would eventually lead into the Mexican-American War. The idea that the U.S. wanted to expand itself all across North America was a cause to the war. As many started settling in, the idea that the United States had a “God given right” to get this land became more and more common. The U.S. offered an amount of money to obtain Mexico, but Mexico declined, which the U.S viewed as a problem. The annexation of Texas lead to increased tensions between both countries. Texas eventually revolted due to the way their government tried to run province. The Treaty of Guadalupe helped resolve this conflict, which was presented under terms that Mexico would give up 50,000 square miles of land…

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the colonies are growing, land expansion was much needed. More land meant more income opportunities. So America wanted to expand their nation more western towards the pacific coast. The white, Protestant American in the mid-nineteenth century defined this progress as a mission to extend their limitations of freedom by opposing their beliefs of self-government and Protestantism.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sectionalism In The 1800s

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In American History, we are currently studying the concept of sectionalism. Sectionalism is division within a country based on regional beliefs and interests. In the early to mid 1800’s, sectionalism in America grew as slavery divided the nation. Slavery was ignored, compromised and argued about by the states until the conflict drove our country until the Civil War. Although regional differences are not as distinct these days, many issues are currently causing division among the states and people of our country. These issues lead to what our history class describes as “modern sectionalism.” One such issue is Gay Marriage.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays