Preview

Individual Decision Making vs Group Decision Making

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2847 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Individual Decision Making vs Group Decision Making
‘Given the potential problems associated with group decision making, organisations should rely on individual decision making whenever possible’. How far do you agree/disagree with this statement?
From the days when working conditions were under the strict rules of Taylorism, workers these days are required to be equipped with various soft skills and not to forget, the important value of teamwork. Organisations present-day depend heavily on teamwork. Questions such as “what strengths can you bring to the team?” and “are you a team player?” are being asked by corporations whilst hiring new workers. However, behind these ‘teamwork’ scenarios, Hackman (2002) explains that reality imposes that majority of organisations were started and led by a single talented and courageous human being rather than by a team, no matter how many well-qualified members the team includes. Hence, is resolving matter in a group as effective compared to being solved by a single individual? Included this essay will be a simple explanation of the formation and development of groups as well as the detailed problems faced by group decision making. Additionally both problems faced by group and individual while deciding will be compared amongst each other and finally bringing to a close, which technique of decision making is better: group or individual. Plus, various real life examples of group and individual decision making will be brought in to strengthen the points laid out in this essay. Many authors such as Mackin (1993) take great care to distinguish the difference between the terms ‘group’ and ‘team’. However, as the debate on this particular topic is rather frustrating and not related to the main topic , both the terms ‘group’ and ‘team’ will be considered the same and be used interchangeably in this essay. For this reason, according to Katzenbach and Smith (1993) the more accepted definition of a team is a small number of people with complementary skills working towards a common goal and



Bibliography: (n.d.). Retrieved December 19, 2010, from ITS Tutorial School: http://www.tuition.com.hk/groups.htm (2006, April 10). Retrieved from ScienceDaily: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/04/060410162259.htm Berkowitz, L. (1974). Stages of group development in a mental health team. Psychiatric Quarterly , 48(3), 309-319. Bettenhausen, K., & Murnighan, J. (1991). The development of an intra group norm and the effects of interpersonal and structural changes. Administrative Science Quarterly 36 , 20-35. Cason, T., & Mui, V.-L. (1997). A laboratory study on group polarisation in the team dictator game. Economic Journal , 1465-1483. Cherrington, D. (1989). Organisational Behaviour: The Management Individual and Organsiational Performance. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., & McKee, A. (2002). The emotional reality of teams. Journal of Organizational Excellence, 21(2) , 55-65. Gould, D. (2005, June 5). Retrieved December 18, 2010, from Fifth Generation Work - Virtual Organization: http://www.seanet.com/~daveg/vrteams.htm Gwyne, P. (2009). Managing Culturally Diverse Team. Research-Technology Management , 52(1) pp. 68-69. Hackman, J. (2002). Leading Teams. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing Corportaion. Joyce, P., & Woods, A. (1992). The Organisation 's Role in Employment Training. Journal of European Industrial Training , 17. Katzenbach, J., & Smith, D. (1993). The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-Performance Organisation. Harvard Business Review , 4428. Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A Radical View. London: MacMillan. Mackin, D. (1993). The Team Building Tool Kit . New York: AMACOM. Rangel, E. K. (2009). Clinical Ethics and the Dynamics of Group Decision-Making: Applying the Psychological Data to Decisions Made by Ethics Committees. HEC Forum, 21(2) , 207. Rosenfield, R. H., & Wilson, D. C. (1999). Managing Organizations, 2nd Edition: Text, Reading and Cases. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company. Sam, R., & Galinsky, M. J. (1974). A conceptual framework for group development. In P. Glasser, R. Sarri, & R. Vinter, (Eds.). In Individual change through small groups (pp. 71-88). New York: Free Press. Schattsneider, E. (1960). The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realists ' View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Shin, S.-Y., & Park, W.-W. (2009). Moderating Effects of Group Cohesiveness in CompetencyPerformance Relationships: A Multi-Level Study. Journal of Behavioral Studies in Business, 1(1) , 1. Smith, G. (2001). Group development: A review of the literature and a commentary on future research directions. Group Facilitation , 14. Stoner, J. (1968). Risky and Cautious Shift in group decision: the influence of widely held values. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4 , 442-459. Straker, D. (2005). Changing Minds. Boston: Syque Press. Tosi, H. L., P. Mero, N., & R. Rizzo, J. (2000). Managing Organizational Behavior, 4th Edition. Malden: Blackwell Publishers Inc. Wilson, D., Hickson, D., Butler, R., Cray, D., & Mallory, G. (1986). Breaking the bounds of organization in strategic decision-making. Human Relations, 39(4) , 309-331.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Kozlowski, S. W. and B. S. Bell. ―Work Groups and Teams in Organizations.‖ Bormann, W. C., D. R. Ilagan, D. R., and R. Klimoski. In Comprehensive Handbook of Psychology: Vol. 12 Industrial and Organizational Psychology. New York, Wiley.…

    • 1731 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ratzburg, Wilf H.. (n.d.). Group Cohesiveness. In Organizational Behavior. Retrieved September 13, 2009, from http://www.geocities.com/athens/forum/1650/htmlgroups18.html.…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two well-known contributors in the team decision making field recently published a book on best practices (Sunstein & Hastie, 2015). Sunstein and Hastie argued that current techniques in team decision making have neglected research and, as a result, have a tendency to end unfruitfully. This neglect is problematic, as research shows that teams can potentially outperform individuals and there are tasks that only cross-functional teams with complementary skills can perform (Hinz, Tindale, & Vollrath, 1997; Kerr & Tindale, 2004; van Ginkel, Tindale, & van Knippenberg, 2009; Kameda, Tsukasaki, Hastie, & Berg, 2010). The proliferating use of team-based structures has left many in the current workforce with important decisions to make, but potentially…

    • 3546 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the business world teamwork is increasingly demanded because, if the team is well built, it helps to obtain more objectives with higher quality and in a smaller amount of time. The aim of every team is to join everyone’s forces, following in union on the same path to a common goal that would be hard to reach for a single individual. In the first part of this essay I’m going to discuss how to pick the correct members for a team. Then my attention will move to the issue of how executives manage to merge the individuals that they have picked, into an efficient working team, and how they make sure that the team will work effectively.…

    • 2060 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    References: Banutu-Gomez, M., & Rohrer, W. G. (2011). Teams in organization. The Business Review, Cambridge, 18(1), 54-60.…

    • 2115 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Groups and teams can be defined as, any number of individuals that interact together. When a group is maturing, the number of individuals decreases, when it gets to a stage where there is a high level of group cohesiveness due to commitment and trust among members, it then becomes a team. Cherrington (1994, p.356) identified that “the collective action of a group of individuals is much greater than the sum of individuals acting alone”. This is because workload is eased of individuals when working in a group, in addition an effective performance is achieved. However, some individuals find it difficult working in groups because of the inconveniences attached. Studies show that, most individuals in the UK would rather work alone than work in a group, this is as a result of the cultural diversity (see figure 1). It could be said that the reaction of such individuals could be as a result of them not recognizing the essential roles that groups play in every organisation. Since an organisation is a group of people with shared goals, it is important to ensure that the individuals within the…

    • 2607 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The term ‘team’ is imbued with a meaning derived, from games. However, a more appropriate use of the term would be to use it in the working world and in the business industry where the term appears to be used far more loosely. ‘Team’, (in this instance), can be applied to individuals engaged in a common understanding where their separate roles are non existent. Managers in many work places will talk in an avuncular fashion, (positive) about their team. When a team is formed, (a process that will be discussed later in this report), roles must be assigned to each individual. Now, some individuals may fall into their roles because they have to right aptitude/skills to do so. Others may not have such clear abilities and would need a role assigned to them. Either way Belbin’s ‘Team Role Theory’ is relevant here, as it states that there are nine specific roles that any individual can have within a team;…

    • 2593 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Team development is the cohesiveness of the team and the ability of group members to satisfy their own needs while working effectively with other team members (Nadler, 1998). This is in contrast to a work group who may not necessarily work well together, and may only care about their own self-interests. These are the ones who show up to the meeting table, give standard answers, little input, constructive criticism or feedback, and leave. As Northouse (2012) insists, “effective groups have a clear, engaging direction; an enabling performance situation that contains structure, support, and coaching; and adequate resources” (p. 299). Additionally, Northouse (2012) points out “Larson and LaFasto (1989) studied real-life successful teams and found that, regardless of the type of team, eight characteristics were consistently associated with team excellence”; which include; clear and elevating goals, results-driven structure, competent team members, unified commitment, collaborative work environment, high standards, support, recognition, and ethical leadership (p. 299). While the possession of all of these qualities and characteristics of a leader and its team may seem idealistic; they are elements which can guide the leader and its members towards…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stressing the importance of a clear and elevating goal in performance of an effective team.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The term groupthink originated in 1952 in Fortune magazine by the author William Whyte. The theory, however, was not researched or clearly defined until around 1972 by Irving Janis. Whyte acknowledged that groupthink was a definition in progress; Janis picked up and further developed the study many years later. Groupthink is defined as a group’s inability to make correct decisions as a result of the implied need for group cohesion. “Janis provides a series of statements that collectively are a definition of groupthink: ‘Groupthink refers to a deterioration of mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral judgment that results from in-group pressures’” (Hutter 5). Group members force themselves to come to an agreement about decisions even when some members may have differing opinions on the subject at hand. Basically, doubts are set aside out of fear of offsetting the groups balance.…

    • 3541 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Group Decision Making

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The purpose of this essay is to identify the strengths and weaknesses of group decision making which may perhaps lead to an improvement in organisational decision making. In order for an organisation to exist there must be a collection of people trying to achieve the same purpose. Several issues arise when a group comes together to discuss ideas and formulate plans effecting the organisation. Performance becomes more effective and efficient when proper techniques are used to accomplish a specific task or activity. Brainstorming, the nominal group technique as well as electronic meetings have the potential to assist in complicated situations. Furthermore, with the assumption that these methods facilitate, increasing organisational decision making may occur.…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As team decision making and problem solving is a broad topic, this paper researches on the given topics (I) advantages and disadvantages of team decision making and problem solving; (II)Team leadership and building consensus; (III) Organizational support to team decisions; (IV) Ethical decision making in a team; (V) Team decisions and conflict management.…

    • 3429 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Work Group vs. Work Team

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The formation of a group is often easier then the formation of a team. During a convention people can be grouped together based on age, gender, specialization, or another common factor. The groups’ leader sets the goal and the way to achieve the goal and the group follows the leaders’ direction. A group’s leader success’ is based on the compatibility of the group and the group’s interpersonal dynamic.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Decision-making is fundamentally the process of making a choice from a number of alternatives and it has three levels which are individual, group and organizational (Buchanan, 2010). Nowadays, more and more organization use group decision-making and the benefit of group decision-making is that groups offer the advantages of a greater pool of knowledge, different perspectives, greater problem comprehension and increased acceptance of decision (Hill, 1982). While, it is the very strengths of a group that is also its weaknesses, the cost of bringing individuals together in one place counters the benefits of getting contributions from supposedly independent minds. A number of problems will be examined: group polarization, groupthink, brainstorming and escalation of commitment. In this essay, it will focus on groupthink and firstly will give the definition and then talk about symptoms, give some examples about how groupthink make decision false and give some ideas about how to prevent it and finally give a conclusion.…

    • 749 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    decision making

    • 1716 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In order to understand the behavior of how individuals make choices, we have to first analyze the fundamental levels of decision making namely the individual, the group and the organizational. Bratton et al. (2010) outlined that on different levels of decision-making and there are also different key issues on the effects that they have respectively. Supported by the words of Buchanan and Huczynsk (2010), in an individual decision-making, there are restraints to information and personal prejudice. In group decision-making, there are effects of group coherency on individuals’ interpretation, point of view and conduct towards the issue. While in organizations, there are issues regarding disputes, ability and politics. The reason is because the way any individual make decisions varies differently in various circumstances which in this case refers to the three levels of analysis.…

    • 1716 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays

Related Topics