On
Influence of Procedural Justice and Distributive Justice on Organizational Attachment:
A study in Automobile Industries of Pithampur, Indore (M.P.)
Submitted in the partial fulfillment of
Masters Degree in Human Resource Development
Session 2010-2012
Submitted by Under the expert Guidance of
Vidushi Sharma Dr. Avinash D. Pathardikar
IV semester Head of Department of
Roll No: 4277 Department of HRD
Department of HRD
VBS Purvanchal University
Jaunpur
DECLARATION
I do hereby declare that , this dissertation report titled as, “ A Dissertation Report on Influence of Procedural Justice and Distributive Justice on Organizational Attachment: a study in automobile industries in Pithampur, Madhya Pradesh", has been submitted in the partial fulfillment of the Masters in Human Resource Development, VBS Purvanchal University, Jaunpur (U.P.), is an original piece of work. It has neither been published nor submitted anywhere before. Any resemblance to this report shall be mere a coincidence. Vidushi Sharma IV semester
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
This is to certify that Ms. Vidushi Sharma, student of Masters in Human Resource Development, IV semester has done his dissertation under my supervision on the topic ‘Influence of Procedural Justice and Distributive Justice on Organizational Attachment: a study in automobile industries in Pithampur, Madhya Pradesh '. To the best of my knowledge his research is original piece of work. I wish him good luck for his future endeavors.
Dr. Avinash D. Pathardikar (Human Resource Development)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT A
References: REFERENCES * Adams, J.S.Toward (1963, 67) an understanding of inequity..Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, * Adams J (1965), ‘Inequity in social exchange’, in Berkowitz L (ed.), Advances in Experimental Psychology, Vol. 2, New York: Academic Press. * Alexander, Sheldon and Ruderman, M. (1987). The Role of Procedural and Distributive Justice in Organizational Behavior. Social Justice Research 1 (2). * Aryee, S., Luk, V., and Stone, R.(1998) “Family-Responsive Variables and Retention-Relevant Outcomes Among Employed Parents.” Human Relations. * Barber, A. E., and Bretz, R. D.(2000) “Compensation, Attraction, and Retention.” In S. L. Rynes and B. Gerhart (eds.), Compensation in Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. * Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley. * Brandel, G. A.( 2001) “The Truth About Working in Not-for-Profit.” CPA Journal, , 71 (10). * Bretz, R. D., Boudreau, J. W., and Judge, T. A. (1994) “Job Search Behavior of Employed Managers.” Personnel Psychology, 47. * Buchanan, D and Huczynski, A (1985) Organizational Behaviour, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ * Dittrich, J.E * Dubinsky, A. J. and Levy, M. (1989). Influence of Organizational Fairness on Work Outcomes of Retail Salespeople. Journal of Retailing 65 (2). * Greenberg J (1994) ‘Using socially fiar procedures to promote acceptance of a work site smoking ban’, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 79 . * Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., and Gaertner, S.(2000) “A Meta-analysis of Antecedents and Correlates of Employee Turnover: Update, Moderator Tests, and Research Implications for the Next Millennium.” Journal of Management, 26. * Guest, D E (1991) Personnel management: the end of orthodoxy, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 29(2). * Heneman, H. G., and Judge, T. A. (2000) “Compensation Attitudes.” In S. L. Rynes and B. Gerhart (eds.), Compensation in Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. * Homans, G. C. (1961). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Process. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Wood. * Iverson, R. D. and Roy, P. (1994). A Causal Model of Behavioral Commitment: Evidence from a Study of Australian Bluecollar Employees. Journal of Management 20 (1). * Lawler, E.E.( 1968) III.Equity theory as a predictor of productivity and work quality., Psychological Bulletin,. * Lawler, E.E. (1971) III.Pay and organizational effectiveness.New York, McGraw-Hill. * Lawler, E.E. (1977) III.Reward systems.In J.R. Hackman and J.L. Suttle (Eds.), Improving life at work: ' Behavioral science approaches_to organzationalchange.Santa Monica. CA, Goodyear,. * Leventhal G, Karuza J, Fry W (1980), ‘Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences’, in Mikula G (ed.), Justice and Social Interaction, Spinger-Verlag. * McFarlin, D. B. and Sweeney, P. D. (1992). Distributive and Procedural Justice as Predictors of Satisfaction with Personal and Organizational Outcomes. Academy of Management Journal 35 (3). * Mitchell, T * Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T. and Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction and Turnover Among Psychiatric Technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology 59 (October). * Poulin, J. E., and Walter, C. A. (1992 ) “Retention Plans and Job Satisfaction of Gerontological Social Workers.” Journal of Gerontological Social Work. * Preyra, C., and Pink, G. (2001) “Balancing Incentives in the Compensation Contracts of Nonprofit Hospital CEOs.” Journal of Health Economics. * Rhodes, Susan R. and Steers, R. M. (1981). Conventional vs. Worker Owned Organizations. Human Relations 43 (12). * Roberts, J. A., Coulson, K. R. and Chonko, L. B. (1999). Salespersons Perception of Equity and Justice and Their Impact on Organizational Commitment and Intent to Turnover. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 7 (1). * Samantrai, K. “Factors in the Decision to Leave: Retaining Social Workers with MSWs in Public Child Welfare.” Social Work, 1992, 37. * Scholl, R. W., Elizabeth Cooper and McKenna, J. F. (1987). Referent Selection in Determining Equity Perceptions: Differential Effects on Behavioral and Attitudinal Outcomes. Personnel Psychology 40. * Sheppard B, Lewicki R and Minton J (1992), Organizational Justice: The Search for fairness in the workplace, Lexington * Shore, L * Spector, P. E. (1997) Job Satisfaction. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage. * Storey J (2000), Human Resource Management: A Critical Text (2nd ed.), Thomson Learning. * Thibaut, J. and Walker, L.(1975) Procedural,justice:A psychological analysis.:.Hillsdale, N.J., Erlbaum. * Tyler, T. and Caine, (1931) A.The influence of outcomes-and procedures on Satisfaction with formal leaders.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. * Walton, R E (1985b) Towards a strategy of eliciting employee commitment based on principles of mutuality, in HRM Trends and Challenges, ed R E Walton and P R Lawrence, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. * Werbel, J. D., and Gilliland, S. W. (1999 ) “Person-Environment Fit in the Selection Process.” Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management.