Preview

Insight on Machiavelli

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1434 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Insight on Machiavelli
Carey Emmerke #677
Smith
GPH 320 12/1/13
The Prince: Logical or Illogical?

Many times in philosophy people will bounce around the topic of a god, and even some who believe a god is real may not necessarily believe that their god is working in their lives daily. For me, Yahweh is the only logical explanation for our existence that I can come up with. Most philosophers would look at the last statement and tell me that it is not logical from their point of view for a god to even be in the picture. Humans have many emotions and many different aspects of their lives that form who we are. When you look at the work The Prince, written by Machiavelli you can clearly see how the mind can be filled with so many different ideas on how we are supposed to live this life. From the basics, which includes creation versus evolution, to even how people perceive you on a daily basis? Machiavelli is very concerned with power of all things. In his book, he has devised his ultimate plan to be a successful and powerful ruler. There are real questions to be asked when studying his works though. As I was reading I noticed that faulty logic was one of his main problems throughout the course of this work. The mind is a very powerful thing. We were created so smart that we can literally believe anything that we can come to consider. Logical stability is key to maintaining the power of the mind, which I believe Machiavelli did an extremely poor job of. When looking at Machiavelli a person must first understand that Machiavelli himself never held the position of Prince, but his ideas are all based off of what he thinks is true. Right from the beginning, I would see this being very logically inaccurate. I am not certified to be an architect. In the same sense that Machiavelli is not a Prince, I should be able to write a book about what it takes to be the best architect. Most people with common human reason would understand that to be a statement with faulty logic. Machiavelli’s belief



Cited: Wiker, Benjamin. 10 Books That Screwed up the World: And 5 Others That Didn 't Help. Washington, DC: Regnery Pub., 2008. Print. Ignasov, Trinn. "Analysis of Power, Competition and Strategies: Case of Machiavelli, the Prince." Analysis of Power, Competition and Strategies: Case of Machiavelli,...Web. 01 Feb. 2013. Machiavelli, Niccolò, and William K. Marriott. "15-19." The Prince. London: Dent, 1958. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Chem Lab - Hydration

    • 1038 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The purpose of this experiment is to provide an opportunity to practice proper heating and cooling techniques and to calculate the formula of a known anhydrous compound and to calculate the percent of water in an unknown hydrate from results.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli believes that a government should be very structured, controlled, and powerful. He makes it known that the only priorities of a prince are war, the institutions, and discipline. His writings describes how it is more important for a prince to be practical than moral. This is shown where he writes, "in order to maintain the state he is often obliged to act against his promise, against charity, against humanity, and against religion" (47). In addition, Machiavelli argues that a prince may have to be cunning and deceitful in order to maintain political power. He takes the stance that it is better for the prince to be feared than loved. His view of how a government should run and his unethical conduct are both early signs of dictatorship.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Similar to Machiavelli in Hell, this work, Black describes, as an intellectual biography. Throughout his work, Machiavelli, published in 2013, he constantly attacks the notion that Machiavelli respected his Judeo-Christian upbringing and states in numerous lines of his adherence to what defines atheism, even though Viroli and others do not subscribe to the possibility in the period. His major argument can be summarized in his introduction, noting, “Machiavelli regarded morality and religion as a cloak to be exploited to promote or vindicate the ruler or state; morality and religion were key tools that regularly had to be subverted for selfish ends.” His argument reads deeply into the cynical and ironic trend of reading history regarding Machiavelli’s works rather than offering a literal translation of the texts, making works like Viroli and De Grazia seem a bit white-washed, despite the…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Contrary to popular belief, Machiavelli is not a diabolic political figure in search of power. He is instead an astute politician who uses his extensive knowledge of politics to analyze various princes and principalities in order to educate future…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli isn’t necessarily a teacher of evil because of his courtesy to educate others about past history and persuade people to think differently. We are shown from the Prince that although Machiavelli does have an admiration for ones fortune and skill (virtue). Although there is a set of controversial approaches that he tries to suede people in a position of power to adjust themselves. With this we can learn that although there is to be some success in the mist of violence shown through his teachings it shows that although it is unnecessary and will cause the people who are innocent to retaliate against their administration. Machiavelli also mentions some key past princes who have misused their power.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli the Prince

    • 10718 Words
    • 43 Pages

    Summary — Chapter I: The Kinds of Principalities and the Means by Which They Are Acquired…

    • 10718 Words
    • 43 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Machiavelli’s The Prince, he tackles of issues in society and the government as a whole. Machiavelli believed a good ruler is one that could give justice and provide some type of order to his citizens. He believed that a good ruler should focus more on the present rather than what could be. Machiavelli used several examples to demonstrate his way of thinking in a humanistic way and running a government. He used the fox and the lion for an example. A good ruler should be able to use cunningness and brute force per situation in which it is called for. Machiavelli believes that there are two ways of fighting something, that is by law or by force and he believed those are…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli's philosophy was that "The end justifies the means." This meant that the end result is the most important, and how you got there was of no importance. The Prince was a book of advice to rules on how to found a state and how to stay in power. Machiavelli explained in his book the many different ways to gain power. One way was to acquire land. The four methods that he discusses to acquire more land is: Your own arms and virtue, fortune, others' arms, and inequity. To Machiavelli, the word virtue meant manliness and strength. Machiavelli also advocates the use of evil to achieve any goals. He gives an example of Agathocles of Syracuse as a proof that this works and will enable the prince to rule the land peacefully through fear. "Born of a potter, this one always had an iniquitous life throughout his years: nonetheless, he accomplished his iniquities with such virtue of spirit and of body that, having joined the militia, he rose through its ranks to become praetor of Syracuse. Being established in rank, and having decided to become prince and to keep with violence and without obligation to others what had been conceded him by agreement... ...one morning he convened the people and the senate of Syracuse, as if he had had to deliberate things pertinent to the republic; and at a preordained nod…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    (Strength of argument): For Machiavelli, he believes that a prince should be feared than loved by the people and he specifies, “..a wise prince should build his foundation upon that which belongs to him, not upon that which belongs to others; he must strive only to avoid hatred, as has been said” (Jacobus 47). However, in this case, his argument can be flawed and turned against him. (Tempering the Position): Although Machiavelli does a really great significant job of using logic, reason, and history to convince his readers the proper way a prince should rule; however, he didn’t imply support to show how a prince to avoid being hated by his people because, he too knows, that there will be some people who will learn to hate one from their actions they perform. (Conversation): As a matter of fact, I have experienced a situation similar to what Machiavelli doesn’t want to happen. I am not at all a prince, but I have had people hate me for my beliefs, my attitude, or my actions. There was this one time where this girl began to grow this hatred towards me just because I kicked a pit-bull so he wouldn’t bite this little 6-year old I baby sat. My intention wasn’t to harm the dog, but it was the only way to buy me some time to be able carry the boy back inside my house safely. Even though this act I committed was considered animal cruelty, I had to do it to save the child. However, the girl still went against me on this action, so there goes to show that people can hate someone else because of how they see and…

    • 2621 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli: The Prince

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Throughout my reading of Machiavelli, a particular selection struck me as very interesting. This comes from Chapter 17 when Machiavelli states, “Here a question arises: whether it is better to be loved than feared, or the reverse. The answer is, of course, that it would be best to be both loved and feared. But since the two rarely come together, anyone compelled to choose will find greater security in being feared than in being loved. . . . Love endures by a bond, which men, being scoundrels, may break whenever it serves their advantage to do so; but fear is supported by the dread of pain, which is ever present (Machiavelli 54). I believe this is an interesting question that would be a good topic for debate. Regarding this question, I side with Machiavelli on his reasoning that it is more beneficial to be feared then loved with regards to obedience. Examples of this principle can be seen in our world today. Laws demonstrate this very well. Laws are present to keep society in order, and with disobedience comes penalties. These penalties are what make people obey the law. Without penalties, or using the term pain in an exaggerated sense, most people would continue to break the law being aware that there are no consequences. Fear is what fuels laws to be effective.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George W. Bush, our current President, must keep a copy of Machiavelli’s most celebrated work, “The Prince “(1513), on his desk in the Oval Office. In my opinion, Bush and his administration’s actions mimic Machiavelli’s advice to the Prince on the tactics that he should use to stay in power. I am going to discuss how President Bush uses Machiavellian principles.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Prince

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The advice Machiavelli gives in chapters fifteen through nineteen is for princes to be basically be bad rather than a good prince. Machiavelli’s advice went against all traditional advice books written for rulers that were all about princes being good, honest, and generous because he did not want to discuss imaginary things.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was Machiavelli Satan?

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Church accused Niccolo Machiavelli of being Satan for writing his book The Prince. Machiavelli completed The Prince in 1513. He wrote it as a gift to Lorenzo Medici, called the Magnificent, ruler of Florence. The political views Machiavelli expressed in his book went against the theology of the Church, specifically the Ten Commandments and the Beatitudes.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli - the Prince

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The letters from Machiavelli to the Prince of Florence were not messages of suggestion as much as they were a job application for a place in his dynasty. The actual ambition of Machiavelli was to use this political hypocrisy to promote his own good. He was a firm believer that one should give the people what they want in order to earn their support and respect. Then, once in the public’s good graces, to use your authority, position and support to promote and complete your own agenda, political or otherwise, as long as it would eventually benefit the good of the people.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    which will not be difficult, for all they ask is not to be oppressed… all else seek to win the populace over to his side. Which will be easy to do if he protects their interests” (Machiavelli 32). This an important point that every ruler should have into account if they want to have a loyal populace, it is in some way logical and realist: if a ruler stays in good terms with his people, then they will follow him; if this person is not on the side of the people, then why should the people should him?…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics