Preview

Internet Resources in teaching

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
706 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Internet Resources in teaching
Internet Teaching Resources
Research and critical review of Internet resources to develop a classroom project

During the week I spent in school I noticed that students do not show interest and pay less attention in subjects such as History, English and Catalan. Teachers, to avoid this problem and make the class more dynamic, organize short projects where students have to search for information of/about the item they are working with, in order to copy and paste it later in a color cardboard with photos. I my opinion, this is a good method but I have noticed that the problem is students do not understand the information they are looking for, because they do not read it. They choose the easy way: copy and paste. Teachers should try to find a solution to this problem, I consider the best way to deal with it is new technologies. I think it is a pity students do not take advantage of the Internet, a tool which used properly, can be very useful and significant during the child’s development. I hope to carry out a good research and get a positive outcome since I think it is important for elementary students to know how to search for information, read it and qualify it as valid.
We know that due to the Internet, students can obtain the information they need with a great ease by simply clicking a button. However, I noticed that this great accessibility to any kind of data can be abused. For example, when an assignment is given to the students, what many of them do is just surf through websites, mainly Wikipedia, where apparently all the information they need is posted, and they copy it, and paste it without having a look at the material thoroughly later. In my opinion, this is the big problem I found out in many schools. So I researched some Internet resources which could help students to deepen in the subject they are working with at that time. This does not mean Wikipedia is not a good tool, but as I see it, if they only use the Wikipedia’s resources

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    She supports her colleagues with integrating technology in their classrooms. Mary Hertz teaches high school in Philadelphia, where students have a school issued device to she saw that her students are getting a hard time to focus in making their homework. She always hears that her students complain that her assignments are taking too long to be finished, which she believed that distraction made a huge role in their resentment. Although some teachers implement “No-gadget policy”, this should not be countered because the fact is devices need in the school cannot be remove since it defeats the purpose of having a device and it is counter and it is considered illogical. According to Mary, Schools who implemented E-Learning should teach their students how to manage their attention since Katrina Schwartz refers to the study showing that someone who mastered the ability focus has been connected to their bright future. I think that this journal article gives the reason why e-Learning should not be implemented but the author stated that this is not hindrance, Instead, this a challenge that school should overcome by helping students in the process of integrating learning and technology. This article is helpful because it gives you the main problem of the situation. It is not about how the teachers teach, but it is more on the attitude and the habits of the students that affects their…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philip Lau, writer of the essay, “The Limitations of Wikipedia”, is successful in persuading his readers that the webpage Wikipedia should not be used for college level research. In his essay, Philip states that, “Wikipedia can be a beneficial starting point in gaining general information on a subject but users should be wary of incorrect information”. The essayist’s use of examples, facts and quotes are what makes his argument so convincing.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Mark Wilson’s article “Professors Should Embrace Wikipedia”, Wilson argues that despite the legitimacy of Wikipedia, educators should engage and take part in helping shape the direction of Wikipedia. In a test published in the journal “Nature”, articles in Wikipedia are said to be as revered as those in the “Encyclopedia Britannica.” Since the perceived lack of academic authority, Wilson suggests that those with research specialties should enroll as editors of Wikipedia to add, control, and learn from the information being provided. Wilson describes his own interaction with Wikipedia and how he, his students, and other colleagues have benefitted from the use of it. From becoming a Wikipedia editor and a collaborator with other colleagues, Wilson has “in turn taught some people how to properly reference ideas and information.” Wilson expresses his ideas to involve scholars with Wikipedia to make it more useful to students and the public. Wilson argues that Wikipedia is a source that although warned from, students will go to anyway to start projects, look up terms, and go for general information. If Wikipedia is “the largest coherent store of information and ideas” as stated by Wilson, then “teacher and scholars should have been on this train years ago for the benefit of our students and professions.”…

    • 885 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wikipedia can be beneficial to the academic student as well as the general researching public. Wikipedia covers an immense variety of topics that is continually maintained and updated, relevant, and non-biased in its presentation of information. Wikipedia possess all the qualities a reliable source would have. Wikipedia’s premise is promoting involvement of the general public for inputting information and continually adding into a comprehensive knowledge base.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evaluation of Wikipedia

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When students are assigned research papers, very commonly, professors will say, “Whatever you do, do not use Wikipedia.” Many who research find this website credible, others believe its information is completely false. This essay will evaluate the efficiency of Wikipedia as an online resource for researching purposes; it will discuss the freedom to alter material, the credibility of the website, as well as what good comes from the use of this website for research means.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In an article written by Young, he states that Jimmy Wales says that he wants every college student to understand why they should not use Wikipedia for any course projects or as for any serious projects (2006). Jimmy Wales spoke at a conference in which he stated that he receive numerous emails from students stating that they received a poor grade in an assignment because they referenced Wikipedia. He goes on to say that, no college student should cite from an encyclopedia and that student should do more research to make sure that their findings are correct. He believes that Wikipedia is a good source but be careful and do your research, as the site is not a perfect and should not be used as the only method of source (Young, 2006).…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Validity of Wikipedia

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although not considered to be a credible source for gathering information, Wikipedia is used by everyone in the academic community for obtaining information. The site was established in early 2001 and its purpose is an open source concept using information entered by registered users. The website provides information or description on anyone from the president of the United States to information about a Boeing 747. Higher learning institutions do not consider Wikipedia as a credible or valid source for gathering information. A group of students entering the MBA program and the University Of Phoenix was tasked to debate whether Wikipedia is a creditable and valid source of information.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wikipedia Debatee

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The topic of discussion in week two learning team A was a debate of if Wikipedia was a creditable and valid source of information. The debate consisted of the team member’s previous experience using Wikipedia for research purposes and the general overview of its information. My take on the matter and still is that Wikipedia is not considered a creditable or valid source of information. By further reading into the paper, facts and information are is provided as to why an individual should not considered Wikipedia as creditable or a valid source of information.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The trustworthy of Wikipedia is a huge issue for people especially, students who need to write plenty of research papers. To most teachers’ point of view, Wikipedia is considered as inaccurate source which cannot support the statement strongly. As same as my opinion, Wikipedia only used to search vague information in order to understand whole structure not details.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Wikipedia Research Paper

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Despite the online encyclopedia Wikipedia 's global popularity and massive amount of data covering vast ranges of topics across multiple languages, the validity of the content is questionable. It is a wise decision for universities and other educational institutions to prohibit students from using Wikipedia for reference material. The well known online knowledge bank has close to 4.5 million articles in English alone. With such massive content, it 's probably safe to assume that every person with Internet access has come across one of these articles at some point in their browsing history. The webpage name Wikipedia is very similar to the word encyclopedia and may imply to users that the website is an online version…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Googlepedia

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Randall McClure wrote, “Googlepedia: Turning Information Behaviors into Research Skills” to explain how much today’s teenagers rely on Google and Wikipedia for research. McClure intended to help the audience decide the best way of researching by using two students as examples of what to do and what not to do when using Google and Wikipedia as resources by describing their methods and thinking then explaining what to do instead to become a better researcher, while still using Google and Wikipedia as resources (McClure221).…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wikipedia and Reliability

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I’m always trying to find new efficiencies in all aspects of my life, weather it be a super effective 30 minute workout with Jillian Michael’s BodyShred, or when researching for an upcoming assignment. One resource that I’ll suggest is Wikipedia, and I’m not the only person who will; “It’s an online information source that is increasingly used as the first, and sometimes only, stop for online encyclopedic information.”(Kapila, D., & Royal, C. 2009)…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Not only is the internet easily accessible but it also provides students with several different resources that is…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Wikipedia

    • 276 Words
    • 1 Page

    Firstly, I opened Google Search Engine and printed there the key words: Wikipedia – valuable – research. Then I used related terms as reliable, credible, source. My next step was to read background information on different sites and look for main ideas and issues being discussed, the terminology is being used. I built my statements: 1) Wikipedia AND credibility; 2) Value n5 Wikipedia; 3)Wikipedia AND credible OR valuable OR reliable OR trustworthy AND source OR resource. I used the sites of different universities, because I consider them as the most suitable and credible. The main reason why Wikipedia isn't a valuable research tool is: anyone who wants can post material, and the expertise of the posters is not taken into consideration.…

    • 276 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A book published by Jill H. Ellsworth proclaims of the internet as, “It is a powerful releaser of emotion, motivation and engagement for students. Contacts around the world, make any project more dynamic and more interesting. Both teachers and students can be invigorated by the freshness and immediacy of the Net.”…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays