Preview

Jonathan Harr A Civil Action Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
698 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jonathan Harr A Civil Action Summary
A Civil Action by Jonathan Harr is about a nonfiction civil law case that takes place in Woburn, Massachusetts. It is centered around numerous kids who were diagnosed with leukemia and no one knew why. When Anne Anderson’s child, Jimmy was diagnosed, in the summer of 1772, she wanted to figure out the cause. She finds a childhood leukemia cluster in Woburn, “Of the twelve cases, eight were located in east Woburn, and six of those were clustered in the Pine Street neighborhood, where perhaps two hundred families lived” (Harr 40). She thought the cause was their water source. Their water came from Wells G and H, two sources that have been shut down and examined by the health department due to the water’s foul taste, odor and different color. …show more content…
Grace and Beatrice Foods. The companies allegedly dumped TCE on their land. Since the plaintiffs all had leukemia, from the same transaction, the wells, they all were grouped together: The Anderson family, the Gamache family, the Kane family, the Robbins family, the Toomey family, the Zona family, and the Aufiero family. The two defendants, W.R. Grace and Beatrice Foods were brought into the same lawsuit since they are being accused of TCE contamination. There’s groups because of Collaberal Estoppel and Res Judicata; the issue and lawsuit are only to be tried once. Some of the plaintiffs’ attorneys are Jan Schlichtmann, Kevin Conway, and Charlie Nesson. The defendant’s attorneys are William Cheeseman, Jerome Facher, and Michael Keating. This is a negligence case and is entitled to federal jurisdiction and sent to Judge Walter Jay Skinner. Schlichtmann tries to prove that the companies breached the standard of care. The summons and petition were given to the companies in May of 1982, eight days before the statute of limitations. When the case first started, Cheeseman filed a Rule 11 motion against Schlichtmann to end the case. It had Schlichtmann take the stand and Cheeseman cross examine him about the case. Judge Skinner realized the charges against Schlichtmann were ridiculous and the motion was …show more content…
Schlichtmann started his depositions: first was a worker at Grace named Paul Shalline, head of safety and maintenance. Shalline denies everything, “The man claimed to know nothing about the six barrels of toxic waste that had been buried behind the plant and exhumed by order of the EPA” (Harr 157). He lied to protect himself and his company. Though, during depositions, he was sworn under oath to tell the truth. Next was Grace’s painter, Thomas Barbas, he was not helpful. After those two did not go his way, Al Love was questioned, he’s worker at Grace and lived on Pine Street in east Woburn. Cheeseman was objecting to all questions Schlichtmann was asking about the health of Love’s family, Love found that odd. He tells Schlichtmann about a rumor of fifty or more drums being buried at Grace. Schlichtmann believes he has a strong case. Beatrice was not as promising, the land owned by Beatrice was majorly contaminated with TCE, John Riley, the owner says they destroyed their files; there was no proof. During deposition, Schlichtmann collected medical records from the family members. An expert pointed out, “the pattern of chronic solvent poisoning was unmistakable” (Harr 201). Symptoms were: rashes, abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting, a lot of the families experienced these. Other experts were also brought in the case to prove the health effects of TCE, like Harvard

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Philip B. Royster Case

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On Tuesday, 01/03/207, at 1442 hours, I, Deputy Stacy Stark #1815 was dispatched to take a telephone report for a theft. I spoke to the victim, Philip B. Royster (M/W, DOB: 05/04/1961). Royster stated someone stole numerous tools from his shop trailers parked on Boat Dock Rd. I requested to meet Royster in person at the location to take the report, he agreed.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the movie, ‘ A Civil Action” the case that is presented stated the contamination of the city’s wells. According to the movie, that caused a number of health problems in which it diagnosed eight children with Leukemia and died. After the childrens’ death, the family’s attempted to sue the companies, W.R. Grace, Beatrice Foods, and the tanneries for dumping the chemical TCE, which contaminated the water. Although Jan Schlichtmann’s considered the case worthless because it was an orphan case, he still accepted the case dealing with the tough questioning of loyal workers, constant loss of money and the repeat siding towards the defendant by the trial judge Walter A. Skinner.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the movie, A Civil Action, the plaintiff’s case commenced when a group of various parents and families suspected that the health related issues and deaths in their city of Woburn was the result of contaminated water. Although the attorney, Jan Schlichtmann, was reluctant to take the case at first because they didn’t have plausible cause “who is going to apologize to you when you don’t know who did it and pay me” [1], he perceived that 2 corporations sat on the border of the river. Mr. Schlichtmann and his firm thus took the case and filed a major lawsuit, which stated that that the two corporations, W.R Grace and Beatrice Foods, caused wrongful deaths due to the dumping of hazardous waste.”Lawsuits are a declaration of war. They begin the same way: with a complaint” [1]. The…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the film A Civil Action, Jan Schlictmann is the plaintiff representing the eight families of the children who died of leukemia, which the families suspect to be caused by chemical contamination of the water in Woburn, Massachusetts. Anne Anderson spearheads this group of families and is the spokesperson for the group. Schlictmann initially does not want to take the case, arguing that the only reason the case may be successful in court is if the court sees a theatrical value in the dead children. [1] However, after being informed that the defendants are Beatrice Foods and W.R. Grace, both wealthy companies with astronomical assets, Schlictmann takes the case. The defendants are William Cheeseman and Jerome Facher, who represent Grace and…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    W. R. Reilly Case

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ladies and Gentleman of the jury, W.R. Grace and Beatrice foods have polluted the aquifer located under East Woburn. There is no question of this, as testimony from workers such as Al Love show that they have spilled, poured and dumped TCE, or Trichloroethylene. Mr. Reilly testified that he should have known what was happening on the 15 acres of property he leased out to the Whitney barrel company. By dumping TCE and other chemicals onto the ground, these companies introduced these harmful substances into the environment, particularly the aquifer underneath. These chemicals are not industrial revolution chemicals; they are modern, harmful chemicals that have adverse health affects.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ogeechee Fish Kil

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages

    On May 19th, 2011, over 38,000 fish were found dead along an 80 mile stretch of the Ogeechee River near Savannah Georgia in Screven County. This number also included around 15 different species as well. This fish kill was and is the largest of its sort in the history of the state of Georgia. Investigations later revealed that the fish died from columnaris, which can be a deadly bacterial disease when fish have been weakened by other stressors. King America Finishing plant, which is located along the Ogeechee River, became the target of further investigation due to the fact that the dead fish only appeared downstream from the plant, and none were found upstream from the plant. The plant also has a discharge pipe which dispenses into the river. After several visits to the plant pursuant to the fish kill, the Environmental Protection Division discovered that the company had been making numerous unauthorized discharges into the Ogeechee River, of flame-retardant chemicals for over the past five years. Even more surprising was the lack of knowledge that the EPD had of the discharge line, despite the fact that is own inspectors were said to have inspected the plant up to six time since 2006. King America Finishing had failed to inform the EPD that it had a new discharge line, which is required of them under their permit. “EPD rules require companies to notify the department when they want to add new discharge lines, then the state can decide whether to issue a permit. But that didn’t happen in this case, state officials said (Savannah, 2011).” Yet even still, many feel that this is inexcusable on the EPD’s behalf. After the investigations begin to dwindle down and a reasonable conclusion of who was to blame was drawn, the EPD proposed a million dollar payment…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dave Sharland – Mr. Sharland a physical therapist for the North Florida/South Georgia Veteran’s Administration (VA) reported that during his career, he has participated in over 800 physical therapy visits in home settings and been very positive. The Council questioned Mr. Sharland on licensure requirements, technical platform, types of services offered, and patient and patient representative access to services. Mr. Sharland to explain the health care providers working with the VA are only required to obtain a license in one state, but they are limited to providing services to only VA patients. He noted that that necessary technology is sometimes provided directly to patients and that in other instances the patient is responsible for purchasing…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “judgment is properly granted when there is no triable issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 437c(c). A defendant or cross-defendant has met his or her burden of showing that a cause of action has no merit if that party has shown that one or more elements of the cause of action, even if not separately pleaded, cannot be established. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 437(o)(2). Once the moving party defendant meets its burden, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to show a triable issue of material fact exists. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 437c(o)(2). On appeal, the reviewing court exercises its independent judgment, deciding whether undisputed facts have been established that negate the opposing party's claim or state a complete defense. Cal. Lab. Code § 2922 establishes the presumption that an employer may terminate its employees at will, for any or no reason. A fortiori, the employer may act peremptorily, arbitrarily, or inconsistently, without providing specific protections such as prior warning, fair procedures, objective evaluation, or preferential reassignment”.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second chapter of Eyes on the Prize, Standing for Justice discusses segregated South mostly Mississippi and the rising blacks murdered. Its primary focus Emmet Till reviewed the story of what led to his killing and the proceedings after his death. The chapter started with the Supreme Court case of Brown V.S. Board of Education, which desegregate public schools in America. Following the ruling, Mississippians did not welcome the decision, and the lack of court orders showed the government’s actual interest. Even the President of the United States, President Eisenhower did not endorse either side but made that clear when he made a comment about Earl Warren. Noticing the rising threat of African Americans, as the population had more blacks…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roper V. Simmons (2005)

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The case of Roper v Simmons revolves around the question, should children be sentenced to death for a crime that was committed prior to the age of 18. While the 8th and 14th Amendments guard against cruel and unusual punishment, does the punishment of death, for those whose crimes was committed when they were under the age of 18, automatically fall under the category cruel and unusual punishment? The Missouri Supreme Court, basing its decision partially on the Atkins v Georgia decision by the U.S Supreme Court which concluded that executing the mentally ill was a violation of the 8th and 14th Amendments, ruled that Roper v Simmons fell under the category of cruel and unusual punishment. This decision led the state…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    A Civil Action written by Jonathan Harr is the theatrical story telling of drama, emotion, truth, manipulation and twist and turn. Justice system is closely monitored in this book with the help of court case and lawsuit. A Civil Action tries to unfold the story of corporate power and how it affects the average American families of Woburn who fought for their justice. In the book, A Civil Action, the author, Jonathan Harr, portrays the dark side of our justice system. It's one of the best works of Jonathan Harr. He portrays the true story of Woburn families who files the lawsuit against two big companies Beatrice Foods and W.R Grace but because of their corporate power, truth gets manipulated and the lawsuit became lengthy. The book portrays the power of money and how justice is taken for granted by the powerful people of the society.…

    • 2383 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Civil Action Analysis

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages

    More than a tragic story of sorrow, death and family turmoil, Harr's narrative tells the story of how a lawyer and grief stricken families pieced together the pieces of a very complex puzzle to determine the cause and effect that such water contamination had on their personal injury matters. By depicting the work that epidemiologists, geologists, medical experts, civil engineers and public health specialists did over the course of the case, Harr instrumentally lays out the multifaceted sides of Anderson v Cryovac.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Litigation

    • 2306 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Comes Plaintiff, Constance Wolf F/K/A Constance Wolfgram, by counsel, and for her complaint states as follows:…

    • 2306 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Civil Litigation

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Making sure that the correct information and witnesses are kept with the correct client’s case file…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hot Coffee

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The lawsuit ended with Stella Liebeck’s injuries meriting an award of $200,000 compensatory damages; however that award was reduced proportionately to $160,000. The jury also awarded Ms. Liebeck $2.7 million in punitive damages, but because it was allegedly a fraudulent lawsuit, it was reduced by the trial court to $480,000 and stated that McDonald’s engaged in “willful, reckless, malicious, or wanton conduct”. Although this was a reasonable lawsuit, it was occurring when tort reform was gaining speed in the public eye, and was used in different means in the communities to help grow the idea of frivolous lawsuits.…

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays