Judge Trump Case Analysis

In terms of a practical association, President Trump officially signed the executive order claiming that the U.S. will be if Muslims and immigrants were prevented from entering the U.S. The utmost strategy to prevail in attaining positive effects are questionable, which could lead the U.S. into turmoil or increase the power that the U.S. currently upholds. According to the article, President Trump was convinced that this executive order will prevent “evil” from entering the U.S. Although this executive order was created with the aspect to protect the U.S., several politicians including Republican senators have questioned the reliance of this contract. Once the executive order was made official, several legal aliens who arrived in the U.S. were
Robart. Judge Robart’s viewpoints are strong and liberal, for which he believes that keeping refugees and immigrants away will not prevent the safety of U.S. citizens. President Trump believes that using force will help make the nation better again, which makes him more of an aggressive leader. On the other hand, Judge Robart believes that immigrants and refugees should not be forced to leave the U.S. unless they perform any dangerous acts, which is an example of a democratic leader. In my opinion, President Trump is rashly performing his duties one-sidedly because he has the authority to legalize the contracts he sees fit for the U.S. This is an example of excessively using the power bestowed upon him.
From a logical standpoint, the executive order is the start to causing conflicts between other nations. Several refugees and immigrant citizens are powerless against higher authority individuals, which amplifies the role of government officials. The executive order is also an example of power and authority because everyone must oblige to the rules once it is made official. From viewing the article, it indicates that having power and the authority to make decisions is limited even when that person with power is the president of the