Kant Moral Theory Essay
human soul into an animal body) , but because animals and humans were on the same life plane in terms of feelings, ideas, memory and industry.
Remnants of these sorts of perspectives stay in justification for marking down the interests of animals on the premise a present food chain. On this line of thought, in the event that one sort of being frequently eats another sort of being, then the first is said to be higher on the natural way of life. In the event that one being is higher than another on the evolved way of life, then it is common for that being to utilize the other in the promotion of its interests. Since this kind of conduct is common, it doesn't require any further moral support.
b. Kantian Theory
Closely related to Worldview/Religious theories are theories such as Immanuel Kant's (1724-1804). Kant developed a highly influential moral theory according to which autonomy is a necessary property to be the kind of being whose interests are to count directly in the moral assessment of actions. According to Kant, morally permissible actions are those actions that could be willed by all rational individuals in the circumstances. The important part of his conception for the moral status of animals is his reliance on the notion of willing. While both animals and human …show more content…
For Kant, cruelty to animals was wrong only because it was bad for humankind. Rather than simply relying on the fact that it is "natural" for rational and autonomous beings to use non-rational beings as they see fit, Kant instead provides an argument for the relevance of rationality and autonomy. A theory is a Kantian theory, it provides an account of the properties that human beings have and animals lack that warrants our according human beings a very strong moral status while denying animals any kind of moral status at all. Kant's own theory focused
Remnants of these sorts of perspectives stay in justification for marking down the interests of animals on the premise a present food chain. On this line of thought, in the event that one sort of being frequently eats another sort of being, then the first is said to be higher on the natural way of life. In the event that one being is higher than another on the evolved way of life, then it is common for that being to utilize the other in the promotion of its interests. Since this kind of conduct is common, it doesn't require any further moral support.
b. Kantian Theory
Closely related to Worldview/Religious theories are theories such as Immanuel Kant's (1724-1804). Kant developed a highly influential moral theory according to which autonomy is a necessary property to be the kind of being whose interests are to count directly in the moral assessment of actions. According to Kant, morally permissible actions are those actions that could be willed by all rational individuals in the circumstances. The important part of his conception for the moral status of animals is his reliance on the notion of willing. While both animals and human …show more content…
For Kant, cruelty to animals was wrong only because it was bad for humankind. Rather than simply relying on the fact that it is "natural" for rational and autonomous beings to use non-rational beings as they see fit, Kant instead provides an argument for the relevance of rationality and autonomy. A theory is a Kantian theory, it provides an account of the properties that human beings have and animals lack that warrants our according human beings a very strong moral status while denying animals any kind of moral status at all. Kant's own theory focused