Khony Appiah How The Future Will Judge Us Analysis

The Disruption of Logical Fallacies Have you ever come across an article or essay that seems to lack a certain sense of logic? Often times, logical fallacies find their way into papers and documents. These so-called fallacies discourage the audience to continue reading to the end. Logical fallacies are major issues, causing disruption in the flow and credibility of articles. This disruption often leaves readers questioning whether or not what is being stated in the article is true. The essay “How The Future Will Judge Us” by Kwame Anthony Appiah, is a well-written argument that, unfortunately, contains many logical fallacies. The essay “How the Future Will Judge Us” by Kwame Anthony Appiah was published in the Washington Post on September 26, 2010 and discusses the signs and potential contenders for what he calls ‘future moral condemnation’. Appiah opens with the thought that when we look back on practices from
One example of this fallacy is where he states “people who eat factory-farmed bacon or chicken rarely offer a moral justification for what they’re doing.” (Appiah 564). Appiah makes the generalization that anyone eating this meat lacks a moral justification for eating it. The problem with this is that he is trying to say every individual shares the same feelings on the subject when, in reality, everyone is entitled to develop their own unique opinion on any given thing. Appiah also uses hasty generalization to talk about the elderly. He specifically states “nearly 2 million of America’s elderly are warehoused in nursing homes, out of sight, and, to some extent, out of mind,” (Appiah 565). Appiah is stating that thoughts about the elderly are absent from every single person’s mind. Again, a hasty generalization is made when Appiah describes the situation in a way that says no one in the world thinks of the elderly. In reality, not everyone thinks in the same