Preview

Korematsu

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1062 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Korematsu
Name: Neriah Rose Burden
Date: 2/3/15
Graded Assignment
Korematsu v. the United States (1944)

Use the background information and the primary sources in the Graded Assignment: Primary Sources sheet to answer the following questions.

(2 points)
1. What did Fred T. Korematsu do that resulted in his arrest and conviction?
Answer: He refused to report to a Japanese internment camp in California after Pearl Harbor. He then sued the government claiming discrimination. The case eventually made it to the Supreme Court and is one of the most famous Supreme Court cases.

(2 points)
2. According to the first paragraph from the excerpts of the majority opinion, what did the U.S. government believe some Japanese Americans would do if they were allowed to remain free on the West Coast?
Answer:

Many people thought that Japanese Americans would become spies, and were potential threats.

(2 points)
3. The majority of the court believed that compulsory exclusion of large groups of citizens from their homes was okay in what situation?
Answer:

The court ruled that it was okay in cases of Military Necessity. “Compulsory exclusion of large groups of citizens from their homes, except under circumstances of direct emergency and peril, is inconsistent with our basic governmental institutions. But when under conditions of modern warfare our shores are threatened by hostile forces, the power to protect must be commensurate with the threatened danger.” So basically their reasoning was that citizenship has its privileges but also has some responsibilities so when the military was rounding up all the citizens of Japanese descent, they had the duty to obey the responsibility of American Citizenship.

(2 points)
4. What did the dissenting justices think about the power of military authorities?
Answer:
They didn’t do anything; there wasn’t even a vote to see whether or not people agreed with what happened, or if it should happen.

(2 points)
5. The dissenting opinion raises the fact

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court found Korematsu guilty of violating Civilian Exclusion Order No. 34. Despite clear undertones of racial discrimination, Fred Korematsu was still violating a direct order from the President of the United States. He was on fact guilty of that. Korematsu was not exclude from the law. The military fear an invasion by Japan on the West Coast. Consequently, most of the West Coast – including Korematsu's San Leandro home – was declared a military zone in an effort to insure the safety of the US.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Executive Order 9056 Essay

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Korematsu indicated that the government was violating the Fifth Amendment which consist that no one should be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law. The decision in Korematsu indicates that the executive order actually violated the Bill of Rights which include some of his personal rights. Korematsu refused to leave California when he was asked to move into the military homes because he claimed that he was being deprived of his right to live freely and he indicated that the government should not have permission to make these decisions without a due process of law. The due process law is considered in certain court cases to restrict the amount of control the government has available to exercise over their citizens. Since this due process law clause was in fact found in the court case, Korematsu was arrested not due to the racism, but due to the fear of another incident happening similar to what happen in Pearl Harbor. Since he did not follow the order given by the government he had to suffer the consequences of being arrested. Based on this decision, the Supreme Court enforced the Constitution with its decision they took in Korematsu. This type of temporary segregating Japanese Americans by relocating them in interment camps was ruled constitutional. This case was successful in keeping national security and prevented other attacks to…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Korematsu v. United States (1944) case was an unjustifiable case towards individuals with a particular race, but even though at the moment it seemed like the appropriate action to take for the protection of the people in our country, the action towards this race was completely inappropriate and unconstitutional. During the War of World War II, the president of the United States, Franklin Roosevelt put a float the Executive Order 9066 that targeted individuals from the Pacific Coast of Japanese ancestry both citizens and non-citizens. The order was to get any individual with in the area of the Pacific Coast to report to assembly centers where they were being detained until released by military authorities. Individuals with Japanese ancestry were being imprisoned without any evidence that they were a danger to the country and were deprived from their Constitutional rights. At first the first order was for any individual with Japanese ancestry to stay in their home with a curfew assigned to them, without…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Smart, Chris. "Rights Violated to Japanese Americans." Rights Violated to Japanese Americans. Senate Publication 1028-s ( P. 30-34), 02 May 2000. Web. 01 May 2014. http://online.sfsu.edu/jaintern/rightsviolated.html…

    • 1908 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Executive Order 9066

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    First and foremost, the 4th amendment prohibits the unreasonable searching or seizing. These american citizens had no reason to be suspected other than their ancestry. The government was hysteria fueled and decided the place them in camps away from the public. They unreasonably displaced and transferred the japanese to these camps and blatantly disregarded their 4th amendment rights in the process.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Korematsu V. United States was a court case during the time of World War II. After the bombing of Pearl Harbor, people of Japanese descent were considered threats. As a result, Franklin Roosevelt issued the Executive Order 9066 on February 19, 1942. This Order demanded that each and every person of Japanese descent be moved to internment camps, regardless of citizenship. Fred Korematsu, a Japanese American citizen, refused to leave his home to go to the internment camp. Therefore, he was convicted of disobeying the law. This landmark court case was deemed unconstitutional due to the violation of Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment:…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zinn Chp 10 Questions

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages

    9. How did judges interpret the law in favor of those businessmen who wished to expand at the expense of others?…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    History of Regret

    • 2554 Words
    • 11 Pages

    After reading Houston’s memoir Farewell to Manzanar, it brings out the treatment of the government of the United States to the Japanese living in the country at the time of world war two were discriminative. In the Executive Order 9066, it is evident that the policies the government was trying to enforce were solely aimed at oppressing the Japanese. The order opened up a gap that would allow the military commanders to make the decisions on who should be evacuated from the military area. This freedom led to the Japanese being evacuated to concentration camps since they were viewed as threats to the United States. Fred Korematsu was charged with defying military orders to evacuate and detained. According to him, he had not committed any crime to warrant him to be charged. More to that, Korematsu was born in the United States and is thus a citizen of the United States. By arresting him, the government had violated his rights as a citizen of the United States. When he tried to defend himself at the Supreme Court, the judgment passed overlooked the provisions in the law for him as a citizen. This is because it had violated the fourth, fifth and fourteenth amendments. The fourth amends requires that everyone be accorded the right to be secure with everything that belongs to them. It is provided that they shall not be subjected to unreasonable investigation, detention and also any violations of whatsoever nature unless with conclusive evidence. The Fifth Amendment provides for a person’s freedom in the United States to be respected and if it is to be withdrawn then there has to be a legal process to do as such. The fourteenth amendment states that any an individual who is a United States citizen either through birth or by naturalization remains to be a citizen. The government thus is not in a capacity to authorize any laws that will deprive any citizens of their rights or invulnerability as citizens of…

    • 2554 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A redundant act of tyranny was breached upon the rights Japanese Americans based upon Executive Order 9066. This act caused the relocation of about 110,000 people with Japanese ancestry. Approximately 60% of the people that were relocated were U.S citizens with Japanese ancestry. The people that were interned would be told that they were in these camps for their own protection. Then again we must keep in mind that this action occurred because the United States felt like there was spies among us. When Executive order 9066 was signed by Franklin D. Roosevelt all Japanese American were forced to evacuate all throughout the west coast. Another thing to take into consideration is that in Hawaii no actions such as Executive Order 9066 was taken, and one third of Hawaii's population was Japanese Americans at the time. Basically all that the Executive Order 9066 did was take away innocent people's houses, businesses, and strip them of their basic rights just because of their ancestry.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ayy lmao

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages

    IV. What did the Supreme Court decide? Why did the Supreme Court decide as it did?…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Japanese Decries Mass Evacuation; ‘ If They Do That to One Group They Can Do It to Others,’ Citizens’ Official Says.” New York Times, 19 June 1942. New York Times, query.nytimes.com. This New York Times article discussed the stance of Mike M. Masoka, the national secretary of the Japanese-American Citizens in 1942, on the subject of internment. This article was used to show the opinions of Japanese-Americans who were subject to relocation.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Q: What arguments did the southern legislator make against the Supreme Court decision? Did they question its power to make the decision or the content of the decision itself?…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Using the textbooks, the University Library, or other resources, answer each of the following questions in 150 to 200 words.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Japanese Internment Camps

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The United States government had no right to intern Japanese Americans because of their ethnic background. People argued that the Japanese aliens in the United States posed as a threat but in reality “more than two-thirds of the Japanese who were interned in the spring of 1942 were citizens of the United States” (Ross). The Nikkei had the same rights as any other American citizen, yet they were still interned. The public skipped to the conclusion that all people of Japanese ancestry were saboteurs which heightened racial prejudices. Furthermore, the accusation of disloyalty among Japanese Americans caused the state department to send Agent Curtis B. Munson to investigate this issue among the Japanese Americans; he concluded “there is no Japanese problem on the west coast…a remarkable, even extraordinary degree of loyalty among this generally suspect ethnic group” (Chronology). Munson’s report stated that there was no military necessity for mass incarceration of these people, yet the government ignored and kept the report…

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    First Amendment Paper

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The First Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights is our rights as citizens living in the United States of America. In this paper I will look at three provisions to the First Amendment, highlighting one case for each provision. Included are one case to discuss freedom of speech, one case to discuss separation of church and state and one case to discuss freedom of association.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays