Preview

Leadership Theories

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2967 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Leadership Theories
School: “Modern” Structural Organization Theory (197)

Time Line: post World War II. “Modern” structuralists are grounded in the thinking of Fayol, Taylor, GulickA, and Weber, and their underlying tenets are quite similar: Organizational efficiency is the essence of organizational rationality, and the goal rationality is to increase the production of wealth in terms of real goods and services.

Dominant Model, Metaphor, Underlying Assumptions:

1. Organizations are rational institutions whose primary purpose is to accomplish established objectives; rational organizational behavior is achieved best through systems of defined rules and formal authority. Organizational control and coordination are key for maintaining organizational rationality (p.197).

2. There is a “best” structure for any organization, or at least a most appropriate structure in light of its given objectives, the environmental conditions surrounding it (for example, its markets, the competition, and the extent of government regulation), the nature of its products and/or services (the “best” structure for a management consulting firm probably differs substantially from that for a certified public accounting firm), and the technology of the production processes (a coal mining company has a different “best structure” than the high-tech manufacturer of computer microcomponenets) (p.197).

3. Specialization and the division of labor increase the quality and quantity of production, particularly in highly skilled operations and professions (p197).

4. Most problems in an organization result from structural flaws and can be solved by changing the structure (p197).

“Structural organization theory is concerned with vertical differentiations – hierarchical levels of organizational authority and coordination, and horizontal differentiations between organizational units – such as those between product or service lines, geographical areas, or skills” (p. 197).

Tenants:

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    BUSI690 Rothaermel Ex 3

    • 1270 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The relationship between an organization’s strategy and structure are extremely important because it “directly impacts a firm’s performance” (Rothaermel, 2013, p. 309). Also, as an organization grows, it should reevaluate the current strategy and structure to ensure that it remains the optimal choice for the organization (Rothaermel, 2013). The four types of organizational structures, listed in order of least to most complex according to Rothaermel (2013), are: (1) simple, (2) functional, (3) multidivisional, and (4) matrix.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Erikson, R. (2005). The Importance of Structure in an Organization. Retrieved on November 14, 2010 from www.googobits.com.…

    • 2111 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a result of early criticisms of the leadership trait approach, theorists started to research leadership as a set of behaviors. They assessed what effective leaders did, created catalogs of actions, and identified expansive patterns that indicated different leadership styles.…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to Janda (1960), leadership is a term defined as a scientific discipline of power relationships where group members believe that other members of their group has the right to prescribe a particular behavior to others (Janda, 1960, p. 345-346). However, leadership is the consequence of the interaction of interpersonal relationships between members of a group that obey willingly and not forced to do so under pressure (Ivanova, Zivkovic, & Ivanov, 2011, p. 12756). Despite the contrary, most definitions of leadership differ in many respects; most reflect the assumption of a process that intentionally influences the guidance, facilitation and structured relationships of people in groups or organizations. Leadership…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drawing its origins from complexity science, complexity leadership theory was postulated by Marion and Uhl-Bien in 2001 (Lichtenstein, Uhl-Bien, Marion, Seers, Orton, & Schreiber, 2006). This leadership theory examines leadership practices in organizational operations and involves the study organizational leadership systems related to interaction amongst themselves, how such interactions maintain adaptations and how such interactions eventually influence operational outcomes. (Beyer, B. (2012). A distinct quality of this theory is its ability to be subjected to organizations complicities, with respect to changes and organizational innovations. This theory further incorporates organizational unpredictability and change management (Lichtenstein, Uhl-Bien, Marion, Seers, Orton, & Schreiber, 2006). Uhl-Bien & Marion, 2008 noted that complexity leadership provides information as to leadership roles and qualities and organizational…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Organizational structure is a system used to define a hierarchy within an organization. It identifies each job, its function and where it reports to within the organization (Friend, n.d., para.1). The organizational structure is used to determine how a company operates, how it positions its employees, and how the organization carries out job functions to obtain goals presently, and in the future. According to Waters (2006), “An organizational structure divides a whole organization into distinct parts and defines the relationship among them” (p. 923). Large companies thrive from implementing these types of structures because…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    When it comes to business as any organizations it requires a structure, based on the resources and demands organization can changed or modify their structure. The most common two structures are vertical and horizontal structure which we see every business organization in global market (Bateman & Snell, 2011). In today’s any business organization theirs and important trait is not only the structure, it is the functions within the organization. An organizing function in management highlights the practices individuals use to interact and work with each other. There are many business organizations that are very successful in their own way. When it comes to a business structure it all depends on what is the product business manufacture and what is the target market, it also depend on is this product goes local or it will be a global one. One of the great organizations that started as an idea then went local to national then bloomed to global social networking giant. That is Facebook organization.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Straus, T., Sacks, R., Leithwood, K., Blair, M. (2008) Journal of Educational Administration The Relationship between Distributed Leadership and Teachers’ Academic Optimism.…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Back in October of 2013, I toke this class and received a C+ now I’m taking it again, in 2013 under different circumstance I wasn’t prepared for this class, but this time around things are a little different. Now I am supposed to do a research depicting how different leadership theories apply to your chosen school setting. Things haven’t changed I’m choosing my school to write about while taking the course studies. Edith Robinson Christian Academy (ERCA) in Fort Lauderdale, Florida is a unique private school. (ERCA) proudly uses the slogan, “Love lives here.” In the simplest of terms, this is what Edith Robinson Christian Academy offers the at-risk-youth of Fort Lauderdale, Florida—children, teens, and young adults who may not often hear that they are valued, believed in, and loved. Driven by a philosophy that you can never give up on a child, Edith Robinson Christian Academy staff actively seeks out youth who have been thrown out of school, are unable to reach their full potential in a traditional school or are barred from other programs. This passionate organization helps them change their lives—and realize their full potential. I’m currently the owner but in 2013 I was the owner, Principal, teacher, cafeteria (cook), transportation, etc. whatever it took believe me I did it. Well this school year I have a staff; Principal, five teacher, two cafeteria worker, one security, two transportation driver, and myself the Director of Schools. The grade levels we deal with are from K though 12. In 2013 I we had to pick a leadership theory that best fits your program. I’m to pick a minimum of three different leadership article from Grand Canyon University elibrary. So this time around my position at the school hasn’t change, but I’m more so the true leader here and I have to have my staff understand the direction or vision I have for the…

    • 1681 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The efficient design of structure of any organization requires the analysis involving some parameters and hypothesis. The main factors presented by MINTZBERG with the respective hypotheses (from H1 to H16) associated to the organizational configurations structures are the following: - Related to the age and size of the organization. H1: How much older, more formalized will be the behavior of the people from the organization. H2: The organizational structure reflects the time of the sector. H3: How much bigger the organization, more elaborated is its structure (more specialized its tasks, more differentiated its units and more developed its administrative component). H4: How much bigger the organization, greater the average size of its units. H5: How much bigger the organization, more legalized will be its behavior. - Related to the technical system: production for unit, production in mass and production for process. H6: How much more regulated the technical system, more formalized will be the operational work and more bureaucratic the structure of the operational nucleus. H7: How much more sophisticated (difficult to understand) the technical system, more elaborated will be the non operational structure, further ampler the selective decentralization of the assessors and greater will be the use of the linking instruments. H8: The automation of the operational nucleus transforms a bureaucratic administrative structure into an organic structure. - Related to the environment. Everything that is outside the organization. For example: base of knowledge, customers, competitors, geographic position, economic climate, politician, etc. H9: How much more dynamic the environment, more organic will be the structure. H10: How much more complex the environment, more decentralized will be the structure. H11: How much more diversified they will be the markets of the organization, greater the propensity to divide itself in units based on the market. H12: The extreme hostility in its…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A corporation’s organizational structure is a formal composition of the task and reporting relationships that allows the corporation to control, coordinate, and to motivate its associates as one cohesive unit to ensure a common goal is achieved. Although there are only approximately seven (7) organizational structure types recognized, each organization has a way of pulling these components into one structured outline to portray the necessary relationships. When composing a structure for a particular organization, management looks for the most effective way to categorize departments and their relationships to achieve the highest level of production. Typically these kind of organizational structures are organized in a top-down manner. Once the executive level is satisfied with the structure, it flows down to management. In some cases the organizational structure may not be visible, but judging by actions and specified reporting protocol the structure is intact and in use without a direct micromanagement style. Three of these particular organizations are Wal-Mart, Unilever & Starbucks.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Firstly I begin to talk about Contemporary, “A Contemporary structure empowers working level employees, reduces centralized control and holds all organizational levels responsible for their own decisions.” (azcentral, 2013). There are some ideas and trends that refer to the organizational structure, they are as follows, “flat structures are more responsive, because there is a more direct relationship between the organization’s strategic centre and the operational units serving the customer.” (BPP Learning Media, 2010, pg 77). Horizontal structures are “what Tom Peters (1992) (in Liberation Management) cells ‘going horizontal’ is a recognition that functional versatility (through multi- functional project teams and…

    • 3085 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    SQSM II

    • 2539 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Lim, M., G. Griffiths, and S. Sambrook. (2010): Organizational structure for the twenty-first century. Presented at the annual meeting of The Institute for Operations Research and The Management Sciences, Austin…

    • 2539 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    communication

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In order for an organization to be successful it has to have some type of structure.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Goal-Setting theory

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The more traditional “rational” model of a business organization defines the organization as a structure of formal relationships designed to achieve some technical or economical goal with max efficiency.…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays