Preview

Ledbetter V. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1002 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ledbetter V. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co
Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 05-1074

Summary of one or more of the main legal arguments:
It seems this class has made me realize how tricky the justice system can be. I have been coaxed into reading more and more about the law and realizing that everything is not as black and white as it seems. For this legal research paper I decided to analyze the law concerning pay discrimination. This is a subject dear to my heart, as I believe I witnessed some of this first hand in relation to my wife when she managed a branch of a credit union.
Lilly Ledbetter worked at Goodyear's facility in Gadsden, Alabama, for 19 years, beginning in 1979. She first contacted federal authorities in March 1998, alleging sex discrimination. A formal charge was filed three months later. Ledbetter then took early retirement in November. She claimed she was given poor evaluations and denied raises other workers had been given, all because of her sex. Her lawsuit alleges her starting salary was in line with men performing similar work, but dropped in comparison over the years to the 15 other area managers, all of who were men. Her pay was 15 to 40 percent less than her fellow managers.
Both the EEOC and a jury ruled in her favor, and Ledbetter prevailed and was awarded nearly $4 million dollars in pay and punitive damages, which the judge reduced to $360,000.
The jury had found that Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company had discriminated against Lily Ledbetter by downgrading her evaluations because she was a woman in a traditionally male job. Year after year, the company used these unfair evaluations to pay her less than her male coworkers who held the same job. The jury was outraged by Goodyear's misconduct and awarded back to Ms. Ledbetter to correct this basic injustice and hold the company accountable.
However, in 1998, The Supreme Court ruled against her, holding that she had waited too long to file her lawsuit. It ruled that she should have filed her lawsuit within a short



References: Sherman, Mark. (2007). Justice limits suits on pay discrimination. Retrieved June 22, 2007, from Ft Worth Star Telegram Web site: http://www.star-telegram.com/business/story/119262.html Mears, Bill (2007) CNN Supreme Court Producer Bill Mears June 14, 2007, from Ft Worth Star Telegram http://money.cnn.com/2007/05/29/news/pay-discrimination/ Connell, Tula. (2007) Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act Now in Congress. Retrieved June 17th. Retrieved Jun 22, (2007), from Alfcio.org

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Lilly Ledbetter was one of the very few female supervisors at the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. plant in Gadsden, Alabama, and she worked at that plant for nineteen years, from 1979 till her retirement in 1998. Initially, when she started working for the company, her pay was equal to that of the other male supervisors. However, as time passed the pay discrepancy between Ledbetter and her 15 male counterparts was stark: the lowest she received was $3,727 per month, while the lowest paid male received $4,286. Thus, after realizing this Mrs. Ledbetter filed an official complaint before the EEOC in March 1998, stating that Goodyear violated the Title VII as they paid her a discriminatory low salary due to her sex. After she filed an official complaint, her case went to trial, and the jury concluded that the pay disparity was due to intentional discrimination. However, the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reversed the jury verdict, as it claimed Mrs. Ledbetter’s’ case was not filed in time, as the original discriminatory pay decision occurred before the statutory limitations of 180 days.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is hoe employees should handle situations similar to Ms. Deters. The same thing can happen to males just as it does to females, women obtaining higher positions in the work place are also guilty of taking advantage because of their rank. This case relates to one over Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in which they refuse to hire women for higher position in the business. In the case discussed above Ms. Deters was discriminated also because she was not a “revenue producer.” This case can be related to many degrees of discrimination and will sufficiently shape future…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lilly Ledbetter

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page

    Lilly Ledbetter got a random memo in her mailbox showing her yearly salary and her men colleagues' yearly salary. She saw that she only earned $44,00 a year when her men colleagues earned $9,000 to $18,000 more than her even though they did the same or less amount of work. She saw that Goodyear was discriminating her based on her gender. She knew that just because she was a girl, she wasn't getting the same amount of pay as her men colleagues.…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    History of the case: At trial court they directed a verdit for Dean Witter on issues of Vicarious liability. They found Dean Witter is 15% liable and found Millan is 85% responsible. After Millan appeal the court's decision, the court of appeals also upheld the jury verdict that Dean Witter was only 15% responsible. Overall decision of the case was in favor of Dean Witter.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In her charge with EEOC she claimed "I have been discriminated against because of my sex, female and retaliated against for complaining of discrimination in violation of Title VII section 704(a) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended." (EEOC)…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case was between Hosanna-Tabor Lutheran Church and School against Equal Employment opportunity commission. The church ran school that offered Christ centered education. One of their employees was Cheryl Perich who taught both secular and religious subjects. She began working for the school in 1999 and was committed to giving quality services in her education and leading prayers. In 2004, she suffered a certain condition known as Narcolepsy and she had to quit teaching on a disability leave. In 2005, she notified the principal that she could resume her duties on February that year after the doctors had cleared her of her condition. The principal informed her that she had to wait a little longer because she had been replaced. She was angry and threatened to sue the school, which led to her firing.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. In March of 1998, Ledbetter submitted a questionnaire to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) alleging sex discrimination against her employer. In July of 1998, she filed a formal EEOC charge against the company.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Weyland Prima Facie Case

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The female crane worker must present evidence that an Weyland’s neutral policy, rule, or practice has a disproportionately negative impact on a member of a protected class. In this case, Weyland’s neutral policy is that all crane operators must urinate over the side or back of their cranes instead of bathroom breaks. This rule has a negative impact on female crane workers who are members of a protected class. The policy was not job-related and had a disparate impact on women. The female crane operator was not able to prove a prima facia case of disparate treatment because Weyland had offered her other opportunities outside the crane operator’s position that would have allowed her to continue working.…

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The Supreme Court cobbled together a 6-3 majority to rule in favor of Peggy Young, a UPS employee who was not offered an accommodation by her employer when she was pregnant. The justices didn’t accept the broadest version of Young’s discrimination argument, but they certainly made it clear that nobody can be treated as she was by an employer without recourse to the courts”…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    CLARK V. CHRYSLER CORPORATION U.S COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 2006 U.S APP. LEXIS 2435…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sloane, A. A., & Witney, F. (2011). Labor Relations (13th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, US: Pearson Prentice Hall.…

    • 2253 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Flagrant Violations

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page

    Stephanie your discussion response outlines the activity that an employer would do treating a protected class in disparate treatment treating them differently. Based on this explanation it is evident that the protected classes of people should be protected when employers follow different practices that violate their rights. In light, of these facts many of these protected classes are overlooked by companies and the intent of these violations are never identified. The only way for these types of violations to be identified is for better education to permeate the national workforce. Once this is accomplished the areas of concern, the protected classes will be able to bring suit for flagrant violations. In the article, “Race, Employment, and Crime:…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    signed the Lilly LedBetter Fair Pay Act, which would guarantee the right of women to sue…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Liberation Ideologies

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Oppression and discrimination has existed and continues to exist in the past, present, and future history of the United States. The mistreatment of particular groups infringe on the idea that all individuals are free and equal. Liberation ideology strives to eliminate external and internal oppression of particular groups in both a formal and informal method in our legal system and society. This ideology believes in the freedom and equality of the individual. Similar to welfare liberalism, strong government interaction is necessary to eliminate oppression in the legal system. In our current bipartisan ideological government system, liberation ideology continues to face oppression and discrimination. Therefore, liberation ideology can only fully thrive and coexist within a welfare liberal democracy with strong government interaction. However, liberation ideology should continue to be embraced, despite our bipartisan government, as a utopian vision to remind members that what is current is not the limit to what can exist to ensure that there is individual freedom for all.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is Discrimination? It is making a decision based on an individual’s race, religion, ethnicity, cultural creed, sex or age, creating an unfair environment for employees. It solely involves some unfair treatment of the individual’s rights. However, the reflections of this paper discuss the wage gap between black and white workers in the United State labor market. According to a study, in the past four decades, black workers fall behind in their wages, making less than the white workers, due to racial discrimination. Although, a study, researchers from the Washington-based Economic Policy Institute, said a disparity which disparity is lack of similarity or equality concerning the wage gap needed the governments’ official’s attention to…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays