Raphael 's study of the actions of Western Massachusetts farmers in the second half of 1774 is convincing in its portrayal of a truly revolutionary movement that succeeded in ending both British colonial rule and the politics of deference accorded to the wealthy American-born minions and agents of British imperial rule in 95% of Massachusetts. The author made this book easy to read. He broke down all the chaos in a manner that anyone can enjoy and understand. It shows that the Revolution was started and won by all the people of America, not just Washington, Jefferson, and…
Professor Joanne Freeman unravels her plan for her class to make them be aware of the how the American Revolution came about but to get passed most but not all of the dates and facts of the war. Freeman explains that the American Revolution entailed some remarkable transformations like, converting British colonists into American revolutionaries. This lecture examines the American Revolution from a broad perspective. The best part about her lecture is that she breaks it down into five easy steps to understand, and for her being a professor at Yale she probably is one of the top favorite teachers just because of how easy she breaks her lectures down. Freeman relates herself to one of the Founders, John Adams, because he wasn’t up to the status quo of every other Founder as she states it. John was humorous…
Leading up to the fierce and fiery confrontations at Lexington and Concord, a tumultuous period of debate and negotiation ensued regarding the preferred response of the colonies to British encroachment on their rights. The meeting of Virginian representatives in March of 1775 would prove to be a fruitless affair; that is, until a young, ardent lawyer by the name of Patrick Henry delivered an impassioned oration, with the intent of elucidating upon the reality of the situation: that the then-colonies were being driven to militant opposition of their royal overlords, and that to continue on passively would be to “retreat...[into] submission and slavery.” In his speech, Patrick Henry persuades the convention, and thereby the people, of the necessity of revolution through his employment of metaphorical imagery, stylized religious and mythological allusions, and a slew of rhetorical questions. In a blaze of libertarian sentiment, Henry incited the passions of the delegates and set the stage for the most glorious revolution in the history of mankind.…
3. The American Revolution should really be called the "British Revolution" because marked changes in British colonial policy were responsible for final political division than were American actions. Assess the validity of this statement for the period 1763 – 1776…
3. In the two decades before the outbreak of the American Revolutionary War, there was a profound shift in the way many Americans thought and felt about the British government and their colonial governments. Assess the validity of this statement in view of the political and constitutional debates of these decades. (89)…
What religious turmoil in the Old World resulted in the little colony of Plymouth in the New World?…
With open rebellion taking place against Britain, 1776 was a time of political unrest in the American colonies. Yet while their soldiers were openly fighting the British, capturing forts and fortifying cities, few voiced what the colonies true intents were. They were not fighting to negotiate taxes or self-defense, but to proclaim independence. Swaying the colonies to back open rebellion was not an easy task, with a large part of influence for this action coming in thanks to Thomas Paine’s “Common Sense”…
At the conclusion of the French and Indian war, England realized that there were numerous issues between it and the colonies (Schultz, 2014). However, the foremost issue was one of neglect which had allowed the colonies few taxes and in reality, generalized self-governance. So, the crown decided to attempt to regain control of the colonies by reinstating the Crown’s officiants, preventing smuggling, controlling the settler’s expansion, and increasing taxes (Schultz, 2009). Through the Orders of Council, the Proclamation of 1763, Sugar Act of 1764, the Quartering Act of 1765, and the Stamp Act of 1765 the Crown laid bare its intentions towards the colonies. Although, these acts only served to agitate a population already once removed from an overbearing monarchy. The question remains, how would the colonist react to these new restrictions?…
In his article "A New Kind of Revolution", author Carl N. Degler explains how government institutions had evolved in colonial America before 1763, and how it was threatened by new English actions and Britain's desire to re-gain control over the colonies. English policies and practices were the structure that helped shape colonial government, but the original policies of mother England had many differences to that of colonial policy that can be seen in many way both micro and macro. By the 1850's, many of the English practices and policies had been forgotten, and a unique American government had formed. Colonial governments still resembled those in England in many areas. All but four of the colonies…
The period surrounding the American Revolution (1775-1783) was marked by significant societal challenges and transformations as the colonies grappled with political unrest, economic instability, and social inequalities. Through the examination of various documents from this era, we can gain insights into the complex dynamics of society during this tumultuous time. John Dickinson's condemnation of the Townshend Acts in 1767 reflects the growing resentment among American colonists towards British taxation policies. Dickinson argues that these acts are detrimental to the liberty of the colonies and could lead to a loss of autonomy. His critique highlights the tensions between the colonies and the British government over issues of taxation and…
But it wasn’t only the British militia placed in the American colonies that treated the colonists unfair, but the King of Great Britain was a tyrant, or an unjust ruler who has absolute power in the parliament. Document 7 states, “ The history of the present king of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations [unlawful seizures]... a prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.” This quote thoroughly explains how the King of Great Britain was a tyrant and unfit for this role in the parliament. Another major incident of unfair treatment of the British to the colonists was the Olive Branch Petition. The Olive Branch Petition was a written document that asked the British to cause peace with the colonists, but the British were stubborn and refused to accept the petition. Document 6 exclaims,” No man was a warmer wisher for a peaceful settlement than myself before the fatal nineteenth of April, 1775 (Battle at Lexington and Concord), but the moment the event of that day was made known, I rejected the hardened, sullen tempered [King of England] forever.” This quote shows how the colonists want to create peace with the British, but since they killed many of their family and friends and shed blood on the colonies, they are slowly losing their…
18th century America was a revolutionary time of significant change through a battle for independence from the all-controlling Britain. In spite of the many citizens standing up for the rule of the Parliament, others realized the uttermost corrupt rule the Crown had upon the growing colonies. One of the most influential men during this 18th century revolutionary war against Parliament was John Adams. Notably, John Adams had a strong affiliation with independence in America through his work as a lawyer, as well as through his many writings and articles, such as, “Instructions of the Town of Braintree to the Representative (1776),” which pointed out the flaws and wrong-doings the Crown had over the colonies. The influences Adams projected onto the colonies helped guide the colonies to their eventual gaining of independence from Britain.…
Jefferson uses words such as “oppression,” “injury,” and “abuse” to describe what the British government has done to them. The authors create a feeling of betrayal by using these words, thus pushing the people to accept the separation. There are many cases shown in this article where the King acted without the people’s consent or against the people’s belief. Stating these incidences gained trust that a new government set up by the people and for the people would be more prosperous. Thomas Jefferson shows that the best option for the people of America is to overthrow the government by using…
“Each colony had its own government, but the British king controlled these governments. By the 1770s, many colonists were angry because they did not have “self-government.” The selection of majors also enforced British taxes and did not allow the colonists to make or practice any new laws. The Americans were on the right because the British officials made the first move of the war. The colonists were arming and making an army just in case the British tried to retaliate for the colonists' boycott.…
Starting in 1764, Great Britain enacted a series of measures aimed at raising revenue from its 13 American colonies. Many of those measures, including the Sugar Act, Stamp Act and Townshend Acts, generated fierce resentment among the colonists, who protested against “taxation without representation.” Boston, the site of the 1770 Boston Massacre and the 1773 Boston Tea Party, was one of the main points of resistance. King George III of Britain ramped up the military presence there, and in June 1774 he shut down the city’s harbor until colonists paid for tea dumped overboard the previous year. Soon after, the British Parliament declared that Massachusetts was in open rebellion.…