LEVEL OF LIFE SATISFACTION AMONG SCINCE AND ARTS STUDENTS
Submitted by:
Ayesha Bhatti
Submitted to:
Ms Raumish Tabassum
KINNAIRD COLLEGE FOR WOMEN, LHR
Chapter 1
Introduction
Survey
A survey is a data collection tool used to gather information about individuals. Surveys are commonly used in psychology research to collect self-report data from study participants. A survey may focus on factual information about individuals, or it might aim to collect the opinions of the survey takers.
A survey can be administered in a couple of different ways. In one method known as a structured interview, the researcher asks each participant the questions. In the other method known as a questionnaire, the participant fills out the survey on his or her own.
Surveys are generally standardized to ensure that they have reliability and validity. Standardization is also important so that the results can be generalized to the larger population( Kendra Cherry ,2012)
Advantages of Using Surveys
Surveys allow researchers to collect a large amount of data in a relatively short period of time.
Surveys are less expensive than many other data collection techniques.
Surveys can be created quickly and administered easily.
Surveys can be used to collect information on a wide range of things, including personal facts, attitudes, past behaviors and opinions.
Disadvantages of Using Surveys
Poor survey construction and administration can undermine otherwise well-designed studies.
The answer choices provided on a survey may not be an accurate reflection of how the participants truly feels.
While random sampling is generally used to select participants, response rates can bias the results of a survey.
Types of Survey Data Collection
Surveys can be implemented in a number of different ways. Chances are good that you have participated in a number of different market research surveys in the past.
Some of the most common ways to administer
References: Burke, M., Marlow, C., & Lento, T. (2010). Social Network Activity and Social Well-Being. Proceedings CHI 2010, ACM Press. Canales, C., Wilbanks, B. & Yeoman, A. (2009). Does Facebook have negative impacts on academic performance? Facebook usage in relation to personality and academic performance. Retrieved May 13, 2010 from http://www.covenant.edu/news/09.28.09 Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C. & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection Strategies: Soc al Capital Implications of Facebook enabled Communication Practices. New Media & Society Ginger, J. (2007). The Facebook Project: Cyborging of the Mind in a Permanently Beta Digital Ecology. The Facebook Project.com. Masters paper with an expected release in 2008, December. Retrieved: June 2, 2011 fromhttp://thefacebookproject.com/research/jeff/publications/masters.html Hofstede, G. & Hofstede, G.J. (2005) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind Nazir, A., Raza, A., Gupta, D., Cuhuah, C.N. & Krishnamurthy, B. (2009). Network level footprints of Facebook applications. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCOMM Rouis, S. (2011). Impact of Cognitive Absorption on Facebook on Students’ Achievement. Schulten, K. (2009). The learning Network blog, Retrieved June 10, 2011 from http://learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/21/do-you-spend-too-much-time-on- facebook/. Kiesler, S. (1997). Culture of the Internet. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers (Ed.). Yoder, C. & Stutzman, F. (2011). Identifying Social Capital in the Facebook Interface. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2011, May 7–12, 2011, Vancouver, BC, Canada.