Ltd 2 Case Study Essay
When using the five weeks of progress monitoring data, Emil’s performance level is 26 words per minute (wpm). Emil is responding adequately to Tier 1 instructions. The benchmark goal was 22 wpm and Emil scored increasingly higher than the goal. Emil has been demonstrating progress for each week. I would recommend Emil to continue his education in the general education classroom with less intensive instructions.
Level A - Case Study 2:
Hannah’s slope (rate of growth) after seven weeks of instructions was 0.83. Hannah has not been responding adequately to Tier 1 instructions. The expected rate was determined to be 1.2, since Hannah did not reach this goal. My recommendation for Hannah would be to receive Tier 2 instructions, which are more …show more content…
After using the dual-discrepancy approach, it is specified that she did not meet the criteria for performance level but has exceeded her rate of growth. The outcome of her scores indicated that she is making adequate progress for the Tier 2 instructions. My recommendation would be to continue Tier 2 instructions until her performance level reaches the designated goal.
Level B - Case Study 2: Kateri’s performance level was 63.6 wpm and her rate of growth is 2.7. The dual-discrepancy approach determined that she is responding adequately to Tier 2 instructions. Kateri’s scores increased after week nine, which was the beginning of Tier 2 instructions. My recommendation for her would be to be placed back in Tier 1 with less intensive instructions.
Level B - Case Study 3:
Paul’s performance level is 45.6 wpm and has a slope of 1.2. After Paul’s Tier 2 progress monitoring was calculated, Paul is adequately making progress. This is considered with the low score on his performance level. These outcomes are concerning for the support team members because he is on the borderline of making progress and not comprehending the intensive instructions of Tier 2. If we place him back to Tier 1, their can be a risk of him declining in his scores again. My recommendation would be to continue Tier 2 instructions until his performance level scores
Level A - Case Study 2:
Hannah’s slope (rate of growth) after seven weeks of instructions was 0.83. Hannah has not been responding adequately to Tier 1 instructions. The expected rate was determined to be 1.2, since Hannah did not reach this goal. My recommendation for Hannah would be to receive Tier 2 instructions, which are more …show more content…
After using the dual-discrepancy approach, it is specified that she did not meet the criteria for performance level but has exceeded her rate of growth. The outcome of her scores indicated that she is making adequate progress for the Tier 2 instructions. My recommendation would be to continue Tier 2 instructions until her performance level reaches the designated goal.
Level B - Case Study 2: Kateri’s performance level was 63.6 wpm and her rate of growth is 2.7. The dual-discrepancy approach determined that she is responding adequately to Tier 2 instructions. Kateri’s scores increased after week nine, which was the beginning of Tier 2 instructions. My recommendation for her would be to be placed back in Tier 1 with less intensive instructions.
Level B - Case Study 3:
Paul’s performance level is 45.6 wpm and has a slope of 1.2. After Paul’s Tier 2 progress monitoring was calculated, Paul is adequately making progress. This is considered with the low score on his performance level. These outcomes are concerning for the support team members because he is on the borderline of making progress and not comprehending the intensive instructions of Tier 2. If we place him back to Tier 1, their can be a risk of him declining in his scores again. My recommendation would be to continue Tier 2 instructions until his performance level scores