Preview

Maverick Lodging

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3068 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Maverick Lodging
An Analysis of Maverick Lodging

Abstract
Maverick Lodging is a hotel management company that manages the day-to-day operations of third party franchisees of the Marriott Corporation. The company has recently implemented a balanced scorecard in an effort to align company strategy, structure, performance measurements, and incentives. The organization strategy involves growth in revenue and customer base with the use of differentiation. Issues with the current scorecard and its measures have been identified. Alternative solutions have been researched. A recommended course of action is presented that will allow Maverick Lodging to achieve its strategic goals and objectives.

Theme
Many hotel companies, such as the Marriott Corporation, are in the business of selling hotel franchises. Owners that purchase franchise rights enter into a contract with the Marriott Corporation and have actual ownership of a hotel. Franchisees can either manage the day-to-day operations of the hotel on their own or outsource these responsibilities to hotel management companies for a fee. Maverick Lodging is a hotel management company that operates Marriott franchise hotels on behalf of third party owners. The company receives a base management fee and an incentive management fee based on a percentage of the hotel’s net profit.
Cindy Baum, Vice President of Asset Management, was hired by Maverick Lodging to construct and implement a balanced scorecard as both a management system and measurement system. A balanced scorecard is defined as an integrated set of performance measures that are derived from and support a company’s overall strategy throughout the organization (Garrison, Noreen, & Brewer, 2008). The primary objectives of the balanced scorecard created by Baum were to align the company’s strategy, structure, measurements, and incentives. In1999, the balanced scorecard was implemented and represented the first full year of results. The balanced scorecard was



References: Brickley, J., Smith, C., Zimmerman, J. (2009). Managerial economics and organizational architecture (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Gamble, J., & Thompson, A. (2011). Essentials of strategic management: the quest for the competitive advantage (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Garrison, R., Noreen, E., & Brewer, P. (2008). Managerial accounting (12th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.Hansen, F., Smith, M. (2003). Crisis in America: the role of strategy. Business Horizons, v 46, no 1, 7-18. Hill, C., & Jones, G. (1995). Strategic management theory: an integrated approach (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. Hughes, R., Ginnett, R., & Curphy, G. (2009). Leadership: enhancing the lessons of experience (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Kinney, M., Prather-Kinsey, J., & Raiborn, C. (2006). Cost accounting: foundations and evolutions (6th ed.). Mason: Thomson South-Western. Lawton, R. (2002). Balance your balanced scorecard. Quality Progress, v 35, no 3, 66-71. Manmohan, S. (2008). The lodging industry market structure. Retrieved from http://www.hotelnewsresource.com/article32324-The_Lodging_Industry_Market_Structure___by_Manmohan_Shetty_.html Noe, R., Hollenbeck, J., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P Paladino, R. (2005). Balanced forecasts drive value. Strategic Finance, Jan., 37-42. Taylor, W. (2010). The balanced scorecard as a strategy-evaluation tool: the effects of implementation and a causal-chain focus. Account, v 85, no 3, 1095-117. Whittington, O., Pany, K. (2006). Principles of auditing & other assurance services (15th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful