Preview

Mercy killing

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
382 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mercy killing
The first reason we support mercy killing is it does relieve the pain that the patient suffer. For patients that terminally ill, there no need to make any actions to prolong their life because this may make them struggle and suffer in the last moment of their life. All those chemotherapy and medicines may prolong the patient life but also torture them physically and mentally as these treatments have side effects on human body. It is quite depressed when seeing the patients having all these treatments. It is a way for the patient to release themselves from all these pain.

Another reason we support it is it will reduce the burden of the patient’s family especially from the economically aspects. From the day the patient started to hospitalise, the medical fees for the patient started to count into the bill. For patient that is not capable to carry on these medical fees, they will feel stress to find money to pay for this large amount of bill. They may start to think of selling their own properties and even loan money from loan sharks, just to pay the bill. The medical fee in a hospital is not cheap, if the patient stays one more day in the hospital, the family need to more money to the hospital. Even the patient will also feel stress when know his or her family members are funding for the medical bills.
The third reason is euthanasia can save life. For example, a coma patient who has laid on bed for about 10 years. For this 10 years, he is occupying a hospital bed, medical equipment and medicine that sustain his life. As we know, almost every day, the spaces in hospital are inadequate for incoming patients. Instead of letting the coma patient to suffer and wasting a bed space, mercy killing an incurable patient can definitely save lots of life. Besides, if the organs of the patient are still functioning well, his organs can donate to other patients who are in need and have higher probability to survive. In short, euthanasia not only bring the grief suffered

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Some may say that mercy killing is murder, and should not be done. People might say that mercy killing is not fair the victim has no say in whether they live or die. One article against euthanasia states “ the decision allows euthanasia and assisted suicides. but not also psychological suffering without limiting it to clear parameters.(Warren R.M)” Mercy killing is the most humane thing to do for a patient who is in a vegetative state. It would be unfair to make them suffer. “ choosing a pain free death demonstrates an act of love and compassion.(Preiss,…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First reason is that it violates the physician’s role as healer; instead they become a Grim Reaper. Secondly, it would be difficult or impossible to control and it could pose serious societal risks. Disabled fear PAD because they can be targeted by it due to their limitations. Also, euthanasia can be extended to incompetent patients and those who are otherwise vulnerable (unconscious, under anesthesia, etc). One of the reasons that are not mentioned by AMA is the possibility of using PAD and euthanasia for financial benefit. Another reason is the abuse of involuntary euthanasia to obtain organs for transplantation. Lastly, it can destroy the trust between patients and doctors because doctors wouldn’t be penalized if euthanasia were…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Reg Crew Euthanasia

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The main argument for euthanasia to be legal is that many people believe that everyone should have the right to decide when they want to die. Many argue that because we can determine the course of our lives by our own free will, we have the right to live our lives and determine our own course. It then follows that we also have as human beings, the fundamental right to determine how we die. The argument of people who are very anti-euthanasia is that euthanasia is immoral because life must be preserved and protected. For something to be immoral, it would have to violate moral laws or norms. The preservation of life is, however, the decision of the patient who has full control and not the physician.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    If you think about mercy killing, also known as compassionate homicide, you think about the act of painlessly allowing to die, to avoid extreme measures of pain and suffering. Mercy killing is demonstrated thoroughly throughout John Steinbeck's novel Of Mice And Men. Mercy killing can be argued whether or not it is right or wrong, and/or justifiable, as demonstrated throughout the novel Of Mice And Men. In current society Mercy Killing is considered politically incorrect, although many people agree it is a necassary step to save one from extreme pain and suffering.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rough Draft On Euthanasia

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Furthermore, I have reasons why we can legalize euthanasia. In any condition we suffer into pain, the same as unbearable pain. For example, I can say that if I was in a car accident and i'm into pain which my conditions of pain it’s unable to be controlled then to lose the anxiety of suffer I voluntarily decide a fair way to no longer fear but easily have my death be simply melt away. With all this, by allowing people to choose how and when of their death. I consider with all that been said live what remaining life to the fullest and free from the pain of anxiety. We all have the right to decide what he/she should do with their own life. I can say this because people should not be forced to stay alive if their lives are impossible and don’t bring…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Any action or social policy is morally right if it serves to increase the amount of happiness in the word or to decrease the amount of misery. Conversely, an action or social policy is morally wrong if it serves to decrease happiness or to increase misery.” (RSL/Rachels, EL 247) The utilitarian argument is used to justify and condemn many policies, however, I believe that the argument is especially fitting when it comes to the matter of active euthanasia. Mercy, an action that serves to decrease the overall misery in the world, is an unquestionable sign of kindness and correctness. Mercy comes in many forms and is rarely frowned upon. Following this reasoning, why is mercy that takes the form of ending a suffering patient’s life considered…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia has more advantages than disadvantages and actually helps patients and families in numerous ways: it stops the patient from suffering from horrible, chronic diseases and puts an end to their horrific pain. Euthanasia…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The killing of a sick individual, who does not feel the need to live, is wrong in my opinion. These individuals should be taught how to live with their sickness or handicap. They should be taught to value their life, and that just waking up is a blessing itself. There should not be the option of euthanasia for them to seek out. Whether it be active or passive, the person who is aiding or overseeing the death is morally wrong. They should be tried as a killer along with others who have killed for other reasons other than “helping another.”…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People are usually eager to avoid death because they value being alive, because they have many things they wish to do, and experiences they wish to have. Obviously, this is not the case with a terminally ill patient who wishes to die. Euthanasia provides a way for terminally ill patients to relieve pain; it is unfair on them to endure unbearable pain. Also it can help to shorten the grief and suffering of the patient’s loved ones, as it’s not just the patients suffering but their loved ones are too. Many people think that each person has the right to control his or her body and life and so should be able to determine at what time, in what way and by whose hand he or she will die. Most people would have their pets put down if they were suffering – this would be regarded as kindness. Why can’t the same kindness be given to humans? Patients should also have the right to decide the value of life and death for themselves and have the freedom of choice, but it is not always the case.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia has remained a heated debate among the pro-life and pro-choice community for several decades. Euthanasia is also known as assisted suicide as well as mercy killing. Those who support euthanasia argue that it allows a person to be put out of their misery; they believe that shortening a terminal patient’s pain and suffering is a final “act of mercy” (Medical News). Proponents of euthanasia allege that in the circumstance of having a terminally ill family member or friend, we should end their pain. Therefore, the “Euthanasia” image sends a panging feeling to the viewer’s conscience. The audience is left feeling uncomfortable, for the image leads them to feel liability for extending the pain of a terminally ill patient.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is mercy killing humane? Do we have the right to assess whether a life is worth living? Should euthanasia be practiced only in the terminally ill people or for the debilitated and mentally ill too? In this write up, we get into the heart of the matter by looking at the pros and cons of euthanasia.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Death is not the enemy doctor. Inhumanity is” (Rebman 5.) This quote was said by 78 year old Eli Kahn. He placed on a respirator machine in order to keep him alive but against his wishes. Eli Kahn was among countless people in this world that face an inevitable death who are not given the choice of preventing the pain and suffering. Euthanasia is a word that most people avoid because it is very controversial. But why? Euthanasia is a way of ending the prolonging of suffering, while leaving life in peace. Euthanasia is derived from the Greeks where Eu means good and Thanatos means death. When these phrases are combined the word euthanasia is created; meaning “good death” (6.) There are three types of euthanasia although only two are authentic forms. The first type is active euthanasia. It is described as death by a person through direct action. The second form is passive euthanasia, or the act of removing a life supporting system such as a feeding tube or respirator resulting in nature to taking its course. The third type of euthanasia is called involuntary euthanasia which means euthanasia committed against a person wishes; it is more commonly considered murder (7.) I believe that active and passive euthanasia should be allowed in terminally ill patients. After examining to pros and cons as well as actual cases, it is clear that active and passive euthanasia should be allowed in terminally ill patients despite the issues people may have with it.…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the first and most important reasons for choosing euthanasia is definitely the act of relieving a person’s suffering. Family members all over the world usually choose euthanasia in order to save their loved one suffering from a terminal illness or incurable condition, from further pain and suffering. In most cases the patients themselves give their consent to euthanasia, which is considered to be the act of voluntary euthanasia. Besides voluntary there is non-voluntary euthanasia, also known as ‘mercy killing’, which is performed only when a person is in a persistent vegetative state and cannot make a decision on his/her own. This means that the family has to give their consent to euthanasia instead of the patient. Even though the question raises many debates including ethics, morality and religion, the only purpose of euthanasia should be to prevent a person from living in an irreversible coma, constantly taking pain relievers. Taking into consideration the states the patients are usually in, deciding to euthanise them is the right thing to do.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The decision for euthanasia is a pure moral decision; one that brings with it both positive and negative consequences. The main leading argument is that it allows those who will severely suffer to alleviate their pain before they ultimately pass. This assisted death puts less of a strain on medical supplies and allows the patient to die rather than remain in pain. Contrary, some argue that we do not have the humane…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Economic reasons are for euthanasia, life support machines are expensive to run. If the situation looks completely useless why not end some ones live. The tax-payers have to pay more money to drag someone through unnecessary pain. It will save more money. In the United Kingdom there is a shortage of life support machines, euthanasia can remove someone unlikely to recover and gave the chance of recovery to someone…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays