Preview

Michael Portillo's How To Kill A Human Being

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
919 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Michael Portillo's How To Kill A Human Being
Among many countries throughout the world, they use different methods of execution to serve those justice of the victims families due to a serious crime that occurred. The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is the practice of killing people as a punishment for serious crimes. Many people today debate about this hot topic that their should be a human way to kill these criminals, not kill them at all, or give them all the pain they deserve. Many believe it goes against the eighth amendment, prohibits the federal government from imposing excessive bail, fines, or cruel and unusual punishments. From the documentary on “How to Kill a Human Being,” Michael Portillo, a conservative politician, explores the different ways of how to execute …show more content…
Portillo first analyzed lethal injections.He learned that there were two IV lines that are inserted in the body if the other fails. Doctors are unable to proceed with this method because they took a medical oath to save lives, not kill them. There are three drugs- sodium pentothal, pancuronium bromide, and potassium chloride- involved, however it does not guarantee a death. A person Portillo interviewed said it feels like a burning sensation involving suffocation and takes up to 12 minutes. They are restrained by the ankles and wrist as well. About 20 states authorize lethal injections as the sole method in the United States, but 16 states has it as a primary method and an alternative method. Another method that was analyzed during the film was hanging. About 2 states offers this as a method of execution, but it is still used throughout the world. With hanging, there is a conversion chart involving the weight of the criminal to determine the height of hanging. It disrupts the joint near the neck, damaging the spinal cord and the brainstem. However, the downside to this method is it also does not guarantee a death due to different anatomy among one person to another. There is a slight chance decapitation will be involved. Moreover, Portillo analyzed the use of the electric chair. There is no clear scientific study of the effects of this, but there is the use of 2,450 volts involved.The criminal is connected to the head, ankles, and calves with shocks up to 15 seconds. Again, death is not guaranteed where the heart has a possibility of not getting affected at all. This is one of the most painful executions and may be gory. Lethal gas in a gas chamber is an additional method of execution available in five states. Criminals are put in a room that blows the toxic gas, replacing all forms of oxygen. It is said to be a combined death of a brain seizure and heart

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment is regarded as one of the United States' hottest topics. Those for and against it constantly debate over the various issues that capital punishment brings forth. This essay explains just a few of these topics and my view on the death penalty.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rogerian and Toulmin

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Capital punishment has been around for decades and continues to alter as awareness of its negative connotations rise. Even in the late 1800’s we saw people trying to adjust the act in an attempt to make it more humane, but the reality is that there is no “humane” way of ending another’s life.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Capital Punishment is a moral controversy in today’s society. It is the judicial execution of criminals judged guilty of capital offenses by the state, or in other words, the death penalty. The first established death penalty laws can date back to the Eighteenth Century B.C. and the ethical debates towards this issue have existed just as long. There is a constant pro-con debate about this issue, and philosophers like Aristotle and Mill have their own take on this controversy as well. Aristotle is against capital punishment, while Mill believes it is morally permissible.…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Apart from a short time in the mid-to-late 20th century when a freeze on capital punishment was ordered by the U.S. Supreme Court, this system of punishment has been in constant use in the United States for most of its history. Proponents and opponents have always been at odds over whether the practice should be continued or abolished completely. Lining up on one side are those who believe that the practice deters crime and is cheaper than warehousing a criminal for life in a maximum-security prison and lining up on the other side are those that believe the practice is inhumane and fraught with inconsistencies which make it antiquated and a barbaric form of punishment. Even though the United States…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    During the execution the inmate is restrained in a chair that is equipped with a metal container beneath the seat. Cyanide pellets are put in this container, which is then filled with a sulfuric acid solution. There are three executioners; each turns a key that activates an electric switch. This allows the cyanide to fall into the solution, thus producing a lethal gas. Unconsciousness can occur in a few seconds, if the inmate takes a deep breath. If a prisoner fights the gas, death may be delayed forcing the prisoner to experience wild convulsions. Death is estimated six to eight minutes. The warden is watching a heart monitor in the control room and will pronounce death. After death is pronounced ammonia is pumped into the chamber to neutralize the gas. Exhaust fans remove the fumes from the chamber into two scrubbers that contain water used as a neutralizing agent. The neutralizing takes about thirty minutes (“Methods of…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Koch

    • 533 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In his essay, the author includes seven main arguments opposing capital punishment and refutes them. People may find that the death penalty is a barbaric act and Koch argues this point by suggesting that the method of lethal injection is actually quite humane and literally painless. He also argues that although no other democratic country imposes the death penalty as a form of punishment, no other country boasts a murder rate as high as the United States. The author contends with those who believe capital punishment diminishes life’s value by suggesting the contrary. He has found those who are sentenced to death have been judged fairly and with a great deal of examination. Koch then refutes the argument of capital punishment as a state-sanctioned murder by acknowledging that the state holds much different rights and responsibilities than the individual.…

    • 533 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The death penalty has been an ongoing debate on whether it should be allowed or whether it violates our constitutional right. While most developed Western nations have stopped executing the United States continues to execute offenders (Zimring 2004). From 1977 through 2008 1,136 people have been executed, which consisted of people who committed murder (Procon 2010). Those who are in favor of the death penalty believe it is an important tool to help deter crime and it cost less than life imprisonment (Procon 2010). They believe retribution helps console the grieving family and it also ensures that the offender will never be able to commit another heinous crime (Procon 2010). According to Grant (2004) some people believe that some offenders should face the death penalty because of vengeance and retribution for violent crimes. During the…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    It’s so hard to say where I stand with the death penalty. There are those moments when a person commits a crime so heinous you’re in that state of mind of wanting the death penalty for them. But then you realize this is a human being. I truly do not believe in the death penalty. To me, I think executing someone for a various form of wrongdoing would not punish them. Instead I think that’s just taking them out of their misery. The punishment for doing something wrong that is, for that the person committing such an act, should not be killed but put through suffering by living in jail for the rest of their life. It’s tough, and honestly people have their opinions and it’s in their right to go with or without the death penalty. Capital punishment is one of life 's topics that leave many divided opinions due to its risqué nature. It has been a subject full of controversy for centuries and still continues to be discussed to this day. Throughout my piece I will explain the case that is pro Capital Punishment, as well as the contrasting side - the opposition.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When understanding criminal law it is important to consider the positive and negative effects that different punishment alternatives can have. Over the last century the use of capital punishment, the legal process for which an individual is sentence to death when found guilty of committing a crime, has been a subject debated back and forth between government parties on its effectiveness. Many people believe that the issues of fairness, constitutionality, morality of an individual’s life, and potential of convicting the innocent are too important to allow the use of the…

    • 2611 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty has been a criminal sentence imposed in America for hundreds of years, but it have been extremely controversial as Evan Mandery illustrates in “A Wild Justice: The Death and Resurrection of Capital Punishment in America.” Today, the death sentence is strictly used in murder cases and in thirty-two out of the fifty states in America. In these states, it is completely legal to use the ultimate punishment of death to incapacitate a criminal from committing any further harm to society. Throughout American history, many individuals have supported the death penalty because they believe it is an effective way to deter crime and is a form of retribution. Others have strongly advocated against capital punishment because it is not morally correct and it not applied fairly. Also, some argue that it is unconstitutional to use the death penalty because it violates the cruel and unusual punishment provision of the Eight Amendment written in the United States Constitution.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty in the U.S. has been and continues to be a controversial debate between citizens. Debate regarding the policies, laws and if the death penalty is the best way to punish offenders who commit violent crimes. The history of the death penalty in the United States dates back to the late 1970s. Between 1968 and 1977 there were no executions in the United States. In the Supreme Court case of Furman v. Georgia, the court ruled that capital punishment, as it currently employed on the state and federal level is unconstitutional (Jones, 2006). The Eighth Amendment states that any form of capital punishment qualifies as “cruel and unusual punishment.” The use of executions during this time was primarily based on race and was considered by the Supreme Court as “arbitrary and capricious.”…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capital punishment has been a topic that has been talked about for ages. It has been an issue in the adjudication process since the first execution took place in the United States of America in 1608 (Schneider & Smykia, 1991). Today, cases are being brought before the courts constantly, and they are forced to decide what exactly is “cruel and unusual punishment” in accordance with the eighth amendment. This paper will be looking at how the death penalty has evolved and developed in the United States. It will also be evaluating the effects of the death penalty and looking at the issues that are being faced today in regards to capital punishment. Also, does the death penalty have a place in the future for America?…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recently, there has been talk amongst many Americans about whether or not the “death penalty” should be outlawed in the United States. Although the crime may be unforgivable, no one should have the right to decide whether or not a person’s life should be stripped away, because nothing is more important than a person’s life. There are many reasons why the death penalty should be outlawed, one reason is that many criminals put on trial may face discrimination, and receive a bias punishment. Another reason is that the death penalty is very costly and that the alternative, life without parole, is a much cheaper and easier solution. The death penalty also reflects the moral standing of today's society. Nobody can justify taking another person’s…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capital punishment is the execution of those who have been found guilty of capital crimes. The death penalty, as others say, has been a common ingredient in the United States judicial system since the Anglo-Saxon beginnings. Modern day, Americans on both spectrums of opposing opinions on capital punishment use the United States Constitution to support their positions. The Eighth and the Fourteenth Amendment recognize the existence of capital punishment and outlines conditions for trying individuals accused of capital crimes (“Capital Punishment” 1). Throughout the extensive period of time in which death row inmates have fought for restrictions in capital punishment, many historical events such as…

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is a major topic for debate Shannon Rafferty defends in her portfolio published by Penn State entitled “Death Penalty Persuasive Essay.” She believes the penalty should be allowed because it functions as a deterrent, it provides society retribution and it is morally just. Olivia H. disagrees with use of the death penalty in her essay “Capital Punishment Is Dead wrong.” She tells about the risk of punishing the innocent, and how the states are doing irreversible acts of crime. As the authors disagree about whether the death penalty should be allowed, they have some common ground when it comes to admitting the potential for human error and in both disagreeing to the use of barbaric punishments by the government.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays