Mid Term Essay
Team
Involvement Time
Management Establishing and Following Guidelines Professional
Communication
Excellent (4) Active and substantive involvement in team discussions. Supported team timeline and met the assignment due date. Took the lead on establishing and following the goals, roles, and responsibilities of the team. Interacted with other members of the team with a respectful and professional tone. Communication was clear with no typographical or grammatical errors.
Good (3) Good overall substantive involvement in team discussion. Supported a majority of the team timeline and met the assignment due date. Helped to establish and follow the goals, roles, and responsibilities of the team. Interacted with other members of the team with a respectful and professional tone. Communication was clear with minor typographical or grammatical errors.
Fair (2) Moderate substantive involvement in team discussion. Supported some of the team timeline and met the assignment due date. Followed the goals, roles, and responsibilities of the team. Interacted with other members of the team with an informal tone. Communication was effective with minor typographical or grammatical errors.
Poor (1) Minimal substantive involvement in team discussion. Did not support the team timeline but still met the assignment due date. Did not always follow the goals, roles, and responsibilities of the team. Interactions with other members of the team were disrespectful and inappropriate at times. Communication was poor with numerous typographical or grammatical errors.
None (0) No substantive involvement in team discussion. Did not support the team timeline . Did not follow team goals, roles, or responsibilities. No
Involvement Time
Management Establishing and Following Guidelines Professional
Communication
Excellent (4) Active and substantive involvement in team discussions. Supported team timeline and met the assignment due date. Took the lead on establishing and following the goals, roles, and responsibilities of the team. Interacted with other members of the team with a respectful and professional tone. Communication was clear with no typographical or grammatical errors.
Good (3) Good overall substantive involvement in team discussion. Supported a majority of the team timeline and met the assignment due date. Helped to establish and follow the goals, roles, and responsibilities of the team. Interacted with other members of the team with a respectful and professional tone. Communication was clear with minor typographical or grammatical errors.
Fair (2) Moderate substantive involvement in team discussion. Supported some of the team timeline and met the assignment due date. Followed the goals, roles, and responsibilities of the team. Interacted with other members of the team with an informal tone. Communication was effective with minor typographical or grammatical errors.
Poor (1) Minimal substantive involvement in team discussion. Did not support the team timeline but still met the assignment due date. Did not always follow the goals, roles, and responsibilities of the team. Interactions with other members of the team were disrespectful and inappropriate at times. Communication was poor with numerous typographical or grammatical errors.
None (0) No substantive involvement in team discussion. Did not support the team timeline . Did not follow team goals, roles, or responsibilities. No