Moral Saint By Susan Wolf

Have you ever met someone who was so perfect in their everyday life? In my opinion no one would always do the right thing or right choice in their life. I know people would try to do the right thing but whether they want or not sometimes it's okay not to be a perfect person. By moral saint Wolf described a person whose every action is as morally good as possible, a person, that is, who is as morally worthy as can be and whose life is dominated by commitment to improving welfare of others and society (Wolf, 419-420). Susan Wolf argues that being a moral saint is neither desirable nor reasonable. Wolf claims, that not because becoming one is out of reach for many of us but because of what would be involved in being a moral saint. In the end,
We want to live an entirely virtuous life and society. However, being virtuous, doing what is right is separate from good life and it is an aspect of good life, but separate from well-being. Living a good life is made with associate with right mannered persons and so you could learn, practice and exercise from the connection. But here is an inherent conflict in between these. For us to live well in life we tend to be moral and hope of success. Being morally good person does take priority over the living a good life. What constitutes a good life as well as what counts as being amorally good person is like what Wolf said a person may be perfectly wonderful without being perfectly moral. I agree with Susan Wolf that there is a limit to how much morality we can stand. In the end, Wolf wrote no matter how flexible we make the guide to conduct which we choose to label "morality," no matter how rich we make the life in which perfect obedience to this guide would result, we will have reason to hope that a person does not wholly rule and direct his life by the abstract and impersonal consideration that such a life would be morally good (Wolf, 434). I think this sums up the relations of the totality of good life and being a moral saint in our virtuous