Preview

My Genome, My Self

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1379 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
My Genome, My Self
Predicting Your Health One Genome Sequence at a Time:
Summary/Response of "My Genome, Myself" What if you could predict all of your health risks before they affected you? We would have a much healthier world if everyone knew what they were at risk for before they developed a certain health condition. In Steven Pinker 's "My Genome, My Self", he analyzes the pros and cons of having and publicizing such information. It is important to give both eniviroment, and genes enough credit in shaping who we are and Pinker gives much evidence in his essay as to why relying on genes alone may not prove accurate all the time. This is a new technology and provides many risks if it is made available for public use because of the fact that all the loose ends haven 't been tied up yet. Pinker analyzes how much our traits and health are dependent on our genetic make-up. Is this information developed enough to use in hospitals, or by anyone else who sees it fit? Pinker believes there is still a long way to go when it comes to Genome research. In "My Genome, My Self", Pinker examines what benefits that the study of genomes will actually bring. He questions how much this study will actually help because although it is an interesting issue and tells us alot about our make up, what benefit will that bring for our society? He allows his own genome to be sequenced and published for all to see as part of the Personal Genome Project. Pinker acknowledges that the personal sequence was correct about obvious things about himself but didnt prove so accurate when it came to other aspects of his health. Pinker asserts the idea that genome technology and development is crucial and important for the future and allows us to learn alot about DNA but it doesnt necessarily change anything right now at the state it is in. It could lead to it in the future but as of now the information and usage should be limited to research purposes only. More regulations would be needed as Pinker implies because the



Cited: DiSalvo, David, "Steven Pinker on the Genome and Self Discovery". NeuroNarrative, January 10. 2009. Web. Mary, "Genomes Are Us". Personal Genomics. 25 March. 2011. Web Pinker, Steven, "My Genome, My Self". New York Times, 7 January. 2009. Web. Science In Society, "My Genome, My Self". NorthWestern Unversity, 26 January. 2009. Web

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Jerome Morrow At Gattaca

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages

    If anyone wants to examine their own DNA, then they have easy access to their own biological information. Another positive aspect is if technology is easily accessible to examine DNA, then you can find predispositions that can be fatal. If there is a fatal predisposition, the action can take place to remove it before birth if sperm were used to examine the DNA. A negative aspect is that discrimination can occur easily if an individual were to find a piece of someone else’s piece of genetic DNA, and find information that they are not fond with. Another negative aspect is that someone can use you genetic information against you if they get a hold on it because the world of the movie has everyone able to access technology to examine genetic information, which genetic information can be obtained from handshaking to strands of hairs found on desks in…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In “Building Baby from the Genes Up” Ronald M. Green discusses the ethics of modern genetics. The author states in the article that it is nearly certain that gene technology will be present in the future of humanity. Green begins the article by recounting the story of a couple that wanted to eliminate the high occurrence of breast cancer from their family. To do this, they decided that they would use genetic diagnosis to select only embryos without the gene that may predispose someone to breast cancer.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Monsanto Harvest with Fear

    • 5210 Words
    • 21 Pages

    Einsiedel, E., & Timmermans, F. (2005). Cross Over: Genomics in the Public Arena.Calgary, AB: University of Calgary Press.…

    • 5210 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Life is full of complex situations and uncertainties. Heather Walmsley believes that at-home genetic tests only serve to add more stress and uncertainty to everyday life. She pursues the idea that most of these test results are merely possibilities, that there are far too many factors involved in an individual’s health for these tests to serve their purpose. Walmsley points out the environment, diet, and lifestyle all affect one’s health. Personal genetic tests can be beneficial in the sense that they raise awareness of potential diseases; however, with so many other factors, these tests are not to be taken too seriously.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Term Papper

    • 23605 Words
    • 95 Pages

    (D) an understanding of DNA is essential to making well-informed personal medical choices or to making good public policy decisions about health care…

    • 23605 Words
    • 95 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How much of genetic information can the parents or relatives access raises a concern that it might result in an excessive use of reprogenetics. Furthermore, if scientists allow DNA screening for parents to avoid passing genetic diseases to their children, that might lead to more designer babies. Human genetic engineering is new and current field that has its pros and cons. Therefore, we should be more concerned about setting up the limits of how much access the public and scientists can have on genetic information, and taking in consideration the ethical issues behind…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It can be argued that the discovery of DNA has been an extremely beneficial ordeal. Yes, the genetic makeup of an individual can now be found. Yes, knowing the genetic makeup of an individual can even save their life. But the big question is, will the genetic makeup of our next generation shape their lives, devastate their dreams and leave them feeling "invalid" or second rate to…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crichton says there will be a bill to try and make the full benefit of the decoded genome available to us all and believes that it will return us to fuel innovation and common genetic heritage (442). Calfee says the patients and the research process are the beneficiaries because gene patents are working the way they are supposed to be and have been working for a couple of centuries and more (445). One way or another patenting genes affect our privates human genes we are born with, the money it will cost to have tests done on that specific gene if patented, and the scope of which we can do research to help find the best possible solutions, the question is, is gene patenting for the greater good of human beings or are we so money hungry we would rather be blind to…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Biotechnology has been the source of lots of controversy. There are those that love Biotechnology and dream of all the great things it could bring to mankind. There are also those who see it as threat to mankind, something that could possibly overthrow our current society. James Watson, who along with Francis Crick discovered the double helix structure of DNA, exerts that this controversy is not deserved. He believes that it is pertinent for our future, that it could benefit mankind. Francis Fukuyama, a professor at John Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies and author of the influential best seller Our Posthuman Future, insists that “… our compulsion to control and manipulate natural processes, including the human genome, will ultimately undermine nature itself (Fukuyama 668).” This viewpoint is concerned with conserving mankind as it is. There must be a place in between, a stance that both sides agree on.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From a patient’s perspective, people tend to see genetic information as more definitive, in the sense that 'you cannot change your genes' and that 'genes tell all about your future.’ Such genetic determinism is an oversimplification and does not take into account the nature of biologic pathways. From a provider’s perspective, genomics presents challenges with respect to ethical and professional responsibilities, including the appropriate use of genomic information in the health care setting. I believe that there should be an identification of provider education programs that increase use of appropriate screening, counseling and evidence-based genetic tests. By increasing the effectiveness of genomic testing, it will help dissolve the negative association and further increase the proportion of people who are willing to receive genetic…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The key argument in favor of the human genome project is based on its potential for treating individuals severely affected by their condition. Genetic bases for many diseases have been proven,which makes the human genome project very important for understanding how to treat, and even cure some of these diseases (Friedman & Schustack, 2005) A ideal example is Lesch-Nyhan disease, which is distinguished communication deficits and involuntary self-injurious behavior. Males who have this disorder have to be restrained frequently to prevent them from inflicting serious damage on themselves. Most of these individuals have their have teeth removed to keep from biting their lips off. If we have a new medical genetic technology that will cure this…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I feel that genome editing takes away the mystery of life and how everyone is unique because of their genomes and how they were naturally born. Many people believe that disabilities hinder that person’s life and that they are never happy with their life as a result of their disability. However, “[o]ne study3 found that half of people with serious disabilities ranked their quality of life as ‘good’ or ‘excellent’. ”(Hayden 4). This shows how they are happy with their lifestyles and that they wouldn’t want to change a single thing. Also, when mothers are pregnant, they are able to see if their child has a disability or any type of disease. However, some people decide not to know if their child has a disability or not because they don’t care about that and will love their child no matter what. For example, “Ethan Weiss doesn’t see a child with a disability. He sees his daughter making the most of her life, given all her strengths and challenges. And he knows that wouldn’t change a thing.” (Hayden 4). It shows how some people don’t care if anyone has disabilities and that everyone is special in their own way. Thus, from a social viewpoint, genome editing may not be the best option for the future generation, but it may help cure diseases that harm people’s…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brave New World Analysis

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The science of today can create super baby's, which Huxley predicted by engineering everyone through conditioning. The debate between nature vs nurture has battled for over a century and half, as to whether genes or environment play a role in human nature. Steven Pinker a Canadian psychologist, says that genes are the reason for human behavior. Pinker reinforces his idea by talking about children, “[Anyone with a] child knows that kids come into the world with certain temperaments and talents” (Pinker, 2003). Environmental factors do not play a detrimental role in the development of children, the genes determine how the child will work. Some genes may cause children to have a bad temper, while other genes may make children behave. To edit genes was thought of as a game changer, to be able to remove unwanted traits such as the cancer gene or make people immune to every known bacteria and virus known to man. Today there is CRISPR or Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat. According to Harvard University “CRISPR changed not only the way basic research is conducted, but also the way we can now think about treating diseases” (CRISPR, para 1). Humans can edit genes in other humans to remove genes that are thought as being unworthy or useless. CRISPR can be similar to Brave New World but because of ethics and regulations on changing and or…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When I was fifteen, my mother hauled along two of my friends and I, to a reunion in Phillips, Wisconsin. The whole way to the reunion I was thinking about how thankful I was to have friends with me, to help me escape from the cheek pulling and "cutesy-wootsing", I would receive from the relatives. At the reunion the adults talked among themselves and the children played together. If at this time I would have realized how important my ancestors were, maybe I would have chose to listen in with the adults? I do not think so. After returning from the reunion my mother showed me an old picture of a man that she said was the Czar of Finland, and that I was in fact related to royalty. After some research I figured out the facts for myself.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For the benefit of having access to a full genetic screening, an ethical issue would arise as to whether the information about certain codes like predisposition to diseases would be helpful or harmful to a client. Similarly, screening for genetic abnormalities prenatally could lead to unsafe abortions if the child is abnormal or just a general anxiousness for their baby. While there are many benefits of genetic screening, the ethical dilemmas that accompany each one are…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays