Nietzsche Slave Morality Essay

On the Genealogy of Morality, Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) believed that there are two types of morality mixed in the psychology of human beings (individual) and higher civilisation. This molarity originated from slavery (“will of Power”- where man was exploited by another man) in the past. Even though it does not exist in society today, the morality is still present. Slave-morality values kindness, humility and sympathy are regarded as "herd-morality" (Nietzsche, GM, and Preface 6). Master-morality values independence, nobility, honour and power are regarded as "beyond good and evil" (ibid).

According to Nietzsche, most individuals are leaving under slave morality and there is no master-morality. In the ancient times, masters were seen
It accomplishes revenge by means of judgment. He states that the “Nazis grounds their morality in the Nazi party and they are slaves” (Fraser, 2018 as cited by Nietzsche, GM). Christians ground their morality in Christianity and they show their morals through faith, so they are slaves to Christianity. For example, the church teaches Christians to be humble in order to inherent the kingdom of God. Individuals will participate in this slave morality because they value things such as humility and obedience. Usually, courage, power and pride are seen as evil “there is no master morality when people think for themselves” (Nietzsche et al, 2007, GM). Today, individuals in society do not think form themselves they leave by the rules of the society and politics. He believes that master morality is better because its theory is based on confidence and slave morality is based on theory of hate. Nietzsche suggests that the only solution to this morality is for the slave to revolt against the master. This will make the master feel guilty and ashamed of their fortune. Masters will be made to feel anxious, misery for doing and being who they are. He quotes that “Men of resentment” and “Could achieve the ultimate subtlest, sublimest triumph of revenge…” (Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of Morals, Chapter 2). Cate (2005) argues that masters cannot be persuaded because the rarely speak to
It’s true, societies must go beyond and achieve intellectual capacity in order to transform their society. Today, the world has gone beyond class struggles. Individuals continue to develop technology that fosters better living standards. Mills’ approach tends to balance individual and society freedoms which advance society to higher levels of living. Thus, individuals today cede some of their freedoms to society to enact laws that reinforces that particular society traditions and values. Mills’ school of thought is a step in the right direction i.e. it goes beyond self-preservation to continuous human improvements and better standards of living.

Nietzsche’s theory advances servant and master morality. As society evolves it respects certain aspects of living which I have referred to in Mills’ theory as traditions and values. Societies and individuals respect ways of doing things in life in order to fulfil their freedoms i.e. religious, political, ethnic’s observance among others. These ways have evolved from the initial servant and master moralities. Societies and individual may feel incomplete without such values and