Preview

Non-Cooperation and Khalifat Movement

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
593 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Non-Cooperation and Khalifat Movement
Non-cooperation and Khilafat Movement
During the First World War, the prices of various commodities rose, the conditions of the people worsened and the government extracted many dues from the people in the name of war efforts. This gave rise to resentment among the Indian people and there were several agitations against the government. To contain this, the government passed the Rowlatt Act in 1919 which authorized the government to arrest any person without warrant and to detain him/her without trial for two years.

There were massive protests and demonstrations by the Indian people against this measure of the government. Gandhi also took very active part in this. He started a Satyagrah Sabha which campaigned against this act asking people to disobey it and court arrest. He also gave a call for country-wide hartal which was observed in various places on different dates. But it was generally a success. The government responded with depression. In the Punjab, this repression took its worst form and in the Jallianwala Bagh the military under General Dyer shot at unarmed people without warning. Hundreds of persons – men, women and children – died. This Jallianwala Bagh massacre and the subsequent imposition of martial law in the Punjab horrified the whole country and generated anger against the British rule.

Around the same time, the Indian Muslims were aroused because the Sultan of Turkey was deposed by the British. The Indian Muslim regarded the Turkish Sultan as their Khalifa and they started Khilafat movement for the restoration of Khalifa in Turkey. Mohammed Ali and Khaukat Ali were the leaders of the movement. They called upon Gandhi to guide them. Although Khilafat movement was not directly concerned with Indian politics, Gandhi thought that in this there was an opportunity to unite the Hindu and Muslims again the British. He therefore, openly supported the movement.

Gandhi had decided to simultaneously, launch the non-cooperation movement at an

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    One view presented by the sources is that Indians did not like the British rule. The theme of hostility is presented in Source 11, where Gandhi writes in 1920 that the British are “evilly manned”, using strong words such as “dishonest” and “unscrupulous”, suggesting strong feelings of hostility towards British rule, as Gandhi feels as though the British are almost cheating the Indian people “with no regard to the wishes of the Indian people”, meaning the British are doing what they want without consulting the people they are ruling over. This source shows that the hostility felt by Indians was in fact widespread because it is written by Gandhi, a man who represented and was supported by a variety of people from all classes. This theme of hostility towards British is corroborated in Source 10 where the British are described as “irresponsible” and, like in Source 11, the Indians feel their “rights of human beings are being denied”, showing that the Indians again felt that the British were doing as they pleased without Indian voices being heard. However, as the source is written by Motilal Nehru, leader of the INC, it is difficult to say from this source that hostility was in fact widespread – Nehru only represents the INC which has the high caste community as a significant majority, and as it is written in 1919, we cannot be sure if the hostility was long-lasting as it is the same year as the massacre itself.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The view of which the Amritsar Massacre did create widespread and long-lasting hostility amongst Indians towards British rule is presented in Source 11. ‘The Empire have become dishonest and unscrupulous, with no regard to the wishes of the Indian people.’ This article was written by Gandhi in 1920, which is shortly after the Amritsar Massacre, and the reliability of it is not that high as it is published in his own newspaper. Although it is still useful as Gandhi was a highly influential figure and supported by the masses so what he said would be key. Using strong words such as dishonest and unscrupulous, suggests strong feelings of hostility towards British rule. Also Gandhi feels as though the British are almost cheating the Indian people, meaning that the British are doing what they want without consulting the people they are ruling over. This source shows that the hostility felt by Indians was in fact widespread as it is written by Gandhi, a man who represented and was supported by the masses within India. This source does suggest that the Amritsar Massacre did create widespread and long-lasting hostility among Indians towards British rule.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although it resulted in thousands of Indian supporters being thrown in jail including Gandhi himself, in January of 1931, the government yielded. “Gandhi was released from custody in January 1931 and began negotiations with Lord Irwin aimed at ending the satyagraha campaign. A truce subsequently was declared, which was formalized in the Gandhi-Irwin pact that was signed on March 5” (Pletcher). This was a major victory for Indian independence and Gandhi would not stop until India was a free country. The victory was short lived as “Gandhi returned to India to find himself imprisoned once again in January 1932 during a crackdown by India’s new viceroy, Lord Willingdon”(Bio). Later that year, an imprisoned Gandhi once again showed the impact of non violent protest when he “embarked on a six-day fast to protest the British decision to segregate the ‘untouchables’ those on the lowest rung of India’s caste system, by allotting them separate electorates” (Bio). The public outcry forced the British to amend the proposal In 1934, Gandhi announced his retirement from politics, in order to concentrate his efforts on working within rural communities. This didn't last long as he was quickly Drawn back into the political fray by the outbreak of World War One. Gandhi quickly took control of the INC, and went right back to work demanding a British withdrawal from India in…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Amritsar Massacre or “Jallianwala Bagh massacre’’, as it took place in on the 13th of April 1919 in Jallianwala Bagh garden in Amritsar, a city located in the north of India. General Reginald Edward Dyer had announced before 13 April that ‘’ any processions or gatherings of four men will be looked upon and treated as an unlawful assembly and dispersed by force of arms if necessary’’ (Cavendish, R., 2009). In the enclosed compound were about 5000 to 20 000 Indians according to different sources(Bose, P., & Lyons, L.,1999) They were in fact protesting peacefully against the “Rowlatt act” concerning the right of appeal for the people involved in seditious activities. Dyer placed the military vehicles in front of the only door of the garden and ordered the shooting of all the unarmed civilians. The shooting lasted until the British armed men ran out of ammunition. In fact, the military used approximately 1650 rounds of ammunition, killing 379 civilians and wounding 1136 others (Bose, P., & Lyons, L., 1999). The Amritsar Massacre is considered as a major turning point that led the British government to consider the possible independence of the Indian State as the massacre became source of controversies between the British officials and the Indian nationalists. All sources state clearly that the British government condemned the massacre and qualified it as ‘’unbritish’’. Churchill declared that the massacre was 'an extraordinary event, a monstrous event, an event which stands in singular and sinister isolation'. Dyer, standing before the commission charged of investigating the massacre, declared that he acted according to the rule of law, by engaging more precisely the ‘’minimum force’’ policy of public-order (Doyle, 2011). Subsequently, he also justified his action by the fact that the Indian nationals were defying the British authorities, and his action…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gandhi stated among his people, “This is my hope and prayer. I wish these words of mine reached every nook and corner of the land. My task shall be done if I perish and kill my comrades. It will then be the Working Committee or the Congress to show you the way and it will be up to you to follow its lead,”(On the Eve of Historic Dandi March). Taxes were a shared struggle among Indians due to cash crop prices decreasing, however, the British still demanded payment.…

    • 2080 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anil's Ghost Sparknotes

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The British applied this tactic to undermine the people into rebelling against each other rather than rebel against the government who controlled them. The people were to ignorant to see who their real enemy was because they were to busy being controlled by fear and trauma. This brutal tactic of control allowed the British government to ultimately control all of India by supporting the one strongest faction of the war torn country. By tearing up the entire country into weaker factions created a massive distrust ultimately making is easier to manipulate and dominate India. As in India we see the British divide and rule policy throughout Sri Lanka.…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thematic Essay

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Amristar Massacre occurred on April 3, 1919. The people of India wanted a greater self-rule and Britain promised them independence after World War II. When Britain broke their promise the people of India were infuriated. A large, passive crowd gathered in a northern Indian city called Amristar. A general who went by the name of General Dyer arrived with 50 soldiers. It was against the law in India for large groups of people to gather. Therefore, when they gathered in Amristar and the soldiers arrived General Dyer ordered them to open fire on all the men, women, and children present. Three hundred and seventy-nine people were killed while more than 1,100 were wounded. Dyer felt that this would produce a sufficient moral effect.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When the British were resisting independence for India, they wanted Gandhi’s supporters to get angry and become violent because if they did it would hurt the movement for independence. Gandhi built the movement for India’s independence on noncooperation, nonviolent protest and nonviolent intervention. If the supporters of Gandhi became violent it gave the British a reason to lash back and repression the people of India. This would also cause Gandhi’s supporters to lose the advantage of being morally higher than the British. If the people of India were violent it would have ruined Gandhi’s entire movement of independence and what they were fighting…

    • 104 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Sepoy Rebellion

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of India’s biggest figures during the mutiny is Mangal Pandey, regarded as India’s First Freedom Fighter. It all started with his displease of the British East India Company. While being a Sepoy, his commander went to investigate him only to be shot by Pandey himself. He also attempted to shoot a Lieutenant and was ordered to be arrested on the parade grounds. Every Sepoy in attendance didn’t attempt to arrest Pandey except Shaikh Paltu. He failed to influence his comrades to an active rebellion on the spot and attempted to shoot himself, not…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The cruel treatment and salt monopoly inspired Gandhi to unify the people in “campaign of satyagraha, or mass civil disobedience.” Salt is a vital part of Indian diet recognized when the Salt Acts were enacted which put a “monopoly over the manufacture and sale of salt”. [1] Gandhi led nonviolent demonstrations as the people defied British policy by making salt from seawater. The British would soon respond by brutally beating the peaceful demonstrators bringing international outrage. By August 1947, Britain caved in to the pressure granting India its independence. Gandhi’s civil disobedience movement influenced India by putting it on the path to become the country we know today.[2] Detractors will say that the ends doesn’t justify the means. They claim that civil disobedience will set a standard for illegality and contempt for the law that others will follow. An example used occurred in 1999 in London where the ‘Carnival against Capitalism’ took place. What started as peaceful protest against economic policy devolved into “self-indulgent violence and destruction of property in the city, achieving nothing but notoriety for its cause.”[3] On the other hand if the law itself is unjust then the people should disobey in order to bring about the greater good not just for themselves but for future…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, most of the sepoys were Muslims who don’t eat pork and Hindus who considers cow sacred. Therefore, British didn’t show respect to their culture, but ignored them. For this reason, sepoys refused to accept the cartridges. Then British jailed the disobeyed soldiers, but this action was improperly and led to the sepoys rebelled. Sepoy rebellion was one of the fist attempts of the Indians to rid India of foreign dominance. It led to the rise of nationalism in India and the desire for independence. Furthermore, in 1919, Indians wanted to protest Britain peacefully in Amritsar, but unfortunately, British commander felt nervous about the protest of Indians, then he decided to fire the crowded. This event was known as Amritsar Massacre. It caused many Indian felt angry to the British government and changed their loyalty to British into nationalism. Amritsar Massacre gave Gandhi a chance to become a leader of the independence, and he played an important role on against British imperialism. He urged the Indian National Congress to endorse a policy called civil disobedience, which was to refuse an unjust law by nonviolence actions. For…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Then, in the 1700s, large parts of the Mughal Empire declined and large parts of India went under the rule of the British East India Company, a company which traded with Southern Asia. But for those who did not want the Mughal rules, they became obedient to the British East India Company and soon they were trained as soldiers and commanded by the British. As the British concerned only about trades, most of the people who had resentment towards the Mughals, favored the rules of British East India Company. But in the 1800s, it started to have problems. The cotton imported from Americas and the textiles from the England textile mills overshadowed the India cotton in the global trade market. Next, the Company imposed Western Ideologies. They took steps to ban two Indian practices called Sati and Thagi. They also integrated the Western Ideologies with Western-Style Education and Judical Systems in India. As the India Act of 1784 was passed, power was transferred from the British East India Company to the British Royal Government. The expansion of British Rule and British insensitivity soon led to the Indian revolt of 1857. The revolt was triggered by the rumors that the British introduced rifles to the sepoys, which required both the Hindu and Muslim soldiers to bite the protection of the cartridges, wrapped in cow and pig fats. They refused to bite them as they…

    • 1773 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Disobedience Essay

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dyer ordered 50 Indian soldiers to open fire on the crowd. Hundreds were either dead or…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mohandas Gandhi launched a policy of nonviolent noncooperation against the British following the Massacre at Amritsar in 1919 (Boss, 2012). He used his moral outrage guided by reason to effect change in the cultural norms of India and ultimately helped India gain independence in 1947. Gandhi’s efforts have greatly impacted social and political reform, and have influenced later civil rights movements.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Khilafat Movement was a religio-political Movement propelled by the Muslims of the British India for the maintenance of the Ottoman Caliphate or khilafat-e-usmania and for not releasing for the Muslim blessed places under the control of the Non-Muslims. Amid the 1st World War Turkey agreed with Germany and as Germany began to free Turkey likewise began loosing its domain. When 1st World War reached an end in 1918 Turkey had lost the majority of its domain. Accordingly the issue around then was the means by which the united forces would treat Turkey, the Ottoman Empire or the Khilafat-e-usmania and a large portion of its domain had been involved and this Movement was on its top from 1919 to 1922, despite the fact that it continued amid the later…

    • 3748 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays