During the 1850's, the vast differences between the North and the South brought about the impending notion of war between the two. The South knew that the North had them beat on every level. The North had manufacturing capabilities with factories that could produce supplies necessary for outfitting an army. Also, the North's population of 22 million was nearly three times the population of the South. The South only had nine million people, four million of whom were black slaves. This larger population provided a steady source of military and civilian manpower, and was important in a war of attrition. Lastly, the North grew most of the country's food, and a fighting army can get very hungry. The South had the plantations, but mostly cash crops were grown there.…
In Why the North Won the Civil War, Henry Steele Commager believed that there were multiple causes that led the confederacy to their defeat and that it was “an inevitability in history.” While many historians believed the North won due to their economic, military, diplomatic, and social aspects, Richard N. Current stated that the Union won the Civil War due to their “fundamental economic superiority.” He believed the North sustained a vast and overwhelming economic superiority in men and materials, giving them “an advantage of almost five to two” in everything. The Union succeeded because they were productive with their economy, unlike the Confederates.…
In Williamson Murray's essay he discusses the struggle between the North and the South. Also how it was the first modern war that was fought using technology and industry on the slaughtering fields. The union lacked a cohesive army and a good plan of attack. Once General Grant was in command for the North, the Confederacy was hopeless to win. The Civil War ravaged armies of the North and South, many Americans lost their lives which made this the most costly of all the wars in American history. The North won the war because they "adapted to the conditions of the war." With the help of Abraham Lincoln and Ulysses S. Grant, they came up with a strategy and won the war.…
The North won the Civil War for various reasons. The North had better resources, they had 22 million people verses in the South where they only had about 15.5 million people. They also had more tracks 22 thousand miles while the South had only 9 thousand. The train was used to the Northerners advantage because they could get their supplies faster like food, ammunition, water and clean clothes. The South didn't have the industry to produce good and the ports were all blocked so other imports from other counties couldn't come in.…
Because slaves fought for the South, many slaves were not fighting for what they believe in, while the North had more and passionate soldiers fighting for the North’s stance. Furthermore, the North’s expansion…
The North also had mountains and rivers which made battle easier for the people who knew the area, and harder for people who did not. Also the north was much wealthier than the south and also had lots of railways to transport troops and supplies for the war. The north also had many…
The North and the South grew different way in Civil war. In the South, there were mostly farmers. There weren’t many skilled workers that why manufacturing was not much. But in the North there were a lot of manufacturing and wealthy people, they had a lot of skilled workers. During the Civil War, there were some advantages and disadvantages between South and North.…
Time. Time was the key reason for the North's victory and was achieved through a combination of the first and second reasons. As the war progressed the Union's blockade, largely a paper tiger at the beginning due to the fact that the Navy didn't have enough ships to properly enforce it, became a real blockade that slowly strangled the Confederacy to death. And as the war progressed the South, even before the end of the prisoner exchange, was losing men it could not afford to lose to attrition. Supplies and transportation of supplies. As stated in the first reason, the North was less dependant on Europe than the South was for supplies. There should be little doubt that the South was able to manufacture supplies needed to fight the war, but never in amounts it needed. Industry in the North was a bit larger than it was in the South and was thus able to out produce that of the South. But being able to out produce the South was all well and good unless the South could get the supplies to its troops in the field faster. It then became important to capture major railroad junctions and thus cut off the South's ability to move supplies in a timely…
The Union had a huge advantage over the Confederacy in terms of resources. Not only did the North have a larger population than the South, but they also had a navy, a national army, and vast transportation systems to utilize during the war (Goldberg, 406-07). The Union also operated many manufacturing and industrial plants that could produce weapons and other products of war (Goldberg, 407).…
In order to win the war, the Union had to think smart and play it to their advantage. In the book The Civil War: A Visual History, author John E. Stanchak declared, “During the 19th century, the new era of rail and steam that marked the Industrial Revolution was centered in the Northern states, and a summary of economics and human resources shows their advantages” (Stanchak 54). The North had a lot of railroads which helped them travel faster. They also had more money and organizations than the South. These advantages boosted them further into victory.…
In the Civil War times the Union and Confederates had some large disadvantages and advantages. The Union has a bigger population and 12 more states than the Confederates . That all helps with the amount of soldiers they had to keep fighting. According to ushistory.org, “The North had an enormous industrial advantage as well.” Then they have a lot of supplies to make it through the battle.…
The North had a large railroad system that supplied weapons to the Northern soldiers. Bruce Levine from the University of Illinois stated “The railroads were the most important strategic advantage in the war for transporting supplies” 2016 Video. During the Civil War, the North…
For starters, they didn't Industrialize, as simple as that. The North had five times the number of factories the South had (Historycentral.com, par 2), so the South depended nearly completely on other countries for their 'finished goods' and for their income, from the crops they sold. Also, they did not build many train tracks, less than half the tracks the North had, and these tracks were run down and neglected. So, when the North took the ports and the water ways, they took most of the South's transportation. Since the South thought they didn't need to industrialize, they brought about their own downfall and the loss of the war.…
clothes, cannons, shoes, etc. The North also had railroads on their side. They were able to transport supplies and reinforcements directly to the field. Unlike the South, the North had a navy. This caused the North to set up a blockade around the South. The blockade prevented the South from trading their cotton so it was useless. The North also had a great population advantage. Many immigrants that came to America fought for the North.…
Unlike the South the North had many factories. With those factories they were able to make guns and other weaponry items they could use for the war. They were able to make other supplies such as ammunition and canned food which were major resources during the Civil War. Since they had factories the supplies were able to be made faster so they could use it quicker. They also were able to use the supplies they made and trade for other things they needed. Unlike the South that had no factories and just grew cotton and had to trade for their military supplies the North was able to make it themselves.…