Objection 2: For having killed over a dozen school aged children, why is the nurse required to give the patient a reward by allowing him to live? In this situation, nurses may feel that it is an injustice to allow the patient to live even though he killed numerous others. He did not care …show more content…
Nurses often are faced with the difficult task of treating a patient who has harmed so many other people, but still treating them with the same amount of respect, and integrity. In numerous situations, nurses are faced with the fact that their patient may have caused a major disaster such as a school shooting, bomb explosion, or a car accident. Although nurses are highly trained medical professionals, they are only humans who have emotional reactions under certain circumstances. Throughout nurses careers they witness many unspeakable acts, but there are many individuals who wonder how nurses make split second decisions in times of crisis. For example, there is a young man who has just committed a mass murder at local area high school. The perpetrador murdered over a dozen school children, while wounding countless others. To stop the madness, a police officer opens fire upon the perpetrator, shooting his left leg but not fatally wounding him. An ambulance is called to the scene to take the young man to a local hospital handcuffed to the gurnie. The nurses and doctors rush into the room to provide their care for the patient, realizing that he is the individual who has committed these heinous acts. How does the nurse respond to this